[Bugs] [Bug 1563500] New: nfs-ganesha: in case pcs cluster setup fails then nfs-ganesha process should not start
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Apr 4 04:03:48 UTC 2018
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563500
Bug ID: 1563500
Summary: nfs-ganesha: in case pcs cluster setup fails then
nfs-ganesha process should not start
Product: GlusterFS
Version: 3.10
Component: common-ha
Keywords: Triaged
Severity: urgent
Priority: high
Assignee: jthottan at redhat.com
Reporter: jthottan at redhat.com
CC: amukherj at redhat.com, asriram at redhat.com,
bugs at gluster.org, divya at redhat.com,
jthottan at redhat.com, kkeithle at redhat.com,
msaini at redhat.com, mzywusko at redhat.com,
nlevinki at redhat.com, rhinduja at redhat.com,
rhs-bugs at redhat.com, sankarshan at redhat.com,
saujain at redhat.com, sheggodu at redhat.com,
skoduri at redhat.com, storage-qa-internal at redhat.com
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1226874 +++
Description of problem:
As per the new implementation for 3.1 that we are propsoing is HA by default
for nfs-ganesha server. The problem is that there have been cases when pcs
cluster setup has failed in some scenarios but the point to note is that
nfs-ganesha process has spawned on the nodes, whereas nfs-ganesha should also
not spawn in case pcs cluster setup has failed. Otherwise we are not providing
HA as default with the setup that we are doing
One of the example scenario is BZ 1225507, there may be others.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
glusterfs-3.7.0-2.el6rhs.x86_64
nfs-ganesha-2.2.0-0.el6.x86_64
How reproducible:
several times
Expected results:
We need to have a check that decides if the pcs cluster is up only then
nfs-ganesha should be spawned.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zDg7fmAT4W&a=cc_unsubscribe
More information about the Bugs
mailing list