[Bugs] [Bug 1424894] Some switches don' t have breaks causing unintended fall throughs.

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424894



--- Comment #3 from Worker Ant <bugzilla-bot at gluster.org> ---
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/16677 committed in master by Shyamsundar
Ranganathan (srangana at redhat.com) 
------
commit 688abcc90745515f7e143ef8cf1e938239db597c
Author: Nigel Babu <nigelb at redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Feb 20 08:27:51 2017 +0530

    libglusterfs, gfdb, glusterfs: Add missing breaks

    A few switches did not have breaks causing fall throughs. Most of them
    have been fixed with fall through comments for those that are
    intentional.

    Change-Id: I84c85726b542f38504b50fefab5eba5dbcd27a07
    BUG: 1424894
    Signed-off-by: Nigel Babu <nigelb at redhat.com>
    Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/16677
    NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins at build.gluster.org>
    CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins at build.gluster.org>
    Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins at build.gluster.org>
    Reviewed-by: Jeff Darcy <jdarcy at redhat.com>
    Reviewed-by: Shyamsundar Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WMM7ydpleG&a=cc_unsubscribe