[Bugs] [Bug 1379228] smoke test fails with read/write failed (ENOTCONN)

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379228

Poornima G <pgurusid at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |POST



--- Comment #22 from Poornima G <pgurusid at redhat.com> ---
  RCA:
    ====
    In certain cases, ioc_readv() issues STACK_WIND_TAIL() instead
    of STACK_WIND(). One such case is when inode_ctx for that file
    is not present (can happen if readdirp was called, and populates
    md-cache and serves all the lookups from cache).

    Consider the following graph:
    ...
    io-cache (parent)
       |
    readdir-ahead
       |
    read-ahead
    ...

    Below is the code snippet of ioc_readv calling STACK_WIND_TAIL:
    ioc_readv()
    {
    ...
     if (!inode_ctx)
       STACK_WIND_TAIL (frame, FIRST_CHILD (frame->this),
                        FIRST_CHILD (frame->this)->fops->readv, fd,
                        size, offset, flags, xdata);
       /* Ideally, this stack_wind should wind to readdir-ahead:readv()
          but it winds to read-ahead:readv(). See below for
          explaination.
        */
    ...
    }

    STACK_WIND_TAIL (frame, obj, fn, ...)
    {
      frame->this = obj;
      /* for the above mentioned graph, frame->this will be readdir-ahead
       * frame->this = FIRST_CHILD (frame->this) i.e. readdir-ahead, which
       * is as expected
       */
      ...
      THIS = obj;
      /* THIS will be read-ahead instead of readdir-ahead!, as obj expands
       * to "FIRST_CHILD (frame->this)" and frame->this was pointing
       * to readdir-ahead in the previous statement.
       */
      ...
      fn (frame, obj, params);
      /* fn will call read-ahead:readv() instead of readdir-ahead:readv()!
       * as fn expands to "FIRST_CHILD (frame->this)->fops->readv" and
       * frame->this was pointing ro readdir-ahead in the first statement
       */
      ...
    }

    Thus, the readdir-ahead's readv() implementation will be skipped, and
    ra_readv() will be called with frame->this = "readdir-ahead" and
    this = "read-ahead". This can lead to corruption / hang / other problems.
    But in this perticular case, when 'frame->this' and 'this' passed
    to ra_readv() doesn't match, it causes ra_readv() to call ra_readv()
    again!. Thus the logic of read-ahead readv() falls apart and leads to
    hang.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=K72lzeLSZw&a=cc_unsubscribe