[Bugs] [Bug 1217723] New: Upcall: xlator options for Upcall xlator
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri May 1 11:12:46 UTC 2015
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217723
Bug ID: 1217723
Summary: Upcall: xlator options for Upcall xlator
Product: GlusterFS
Version: 3.7.0
Component: upcall
Keywords: Triaged
Severity: high
Assignee: bugs at gluster.org
Reporter: skoduri at redhat.com
CC: bugs at gluster.org, gluster-bugs at redhat.com
Depends On: 1200271
Blocks: 1200262, 1217711
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1200271 +++
Description of problem:
This bug is to track changes for upcall xlator options required to enable
cache_invalidation and lease_locks support.
Also this will track the changes required to handle cache_invalidation for all
the fops which are missed out in the bug1200262.
--- Additional comment from Soumya Koduri on 2015-03-16 09:20:52 EDT ---
In addition - will address below comments received as part of
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9535 -
* skip cache_invalidation notifications only in case of internal Gluster fops.
Can check using frame->root->pid.
--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-03-24 01:04:42 EDT ---
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9975 (Upcall: Added xlator options to enable
cache-invalidation) posted (#1) for review on master by soumya k
(skoduri at redhat.com)
--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-03-25 03:37:56 EDT ---
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9975 (Upcall: Added xlator options to enable
cache-invalidation) posted (#2) for review on master by soumya k
(skoduri at redhat.com)
--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-03-25 03:43:51 EDT ---
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9975 (Upcall: Added xlator options to enable
cache-invalidation) posted (#3) for review on master by soumya k
(skoduri at redhat.com)
--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-03-26 03:00:43 EDT ---
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9975 (Upcall: Added xlator options to enable
cache-invalidation) posted (#4) for review on master by soumya k
(skoduri at redhat.com)
--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-03-26 03:09:42 EDT ---
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9975 (Upcall: Added xlator options to enable
cache-invalidation) posted (#5) for review on master by soumya k
(skoduri at redhat.com)
--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-03-30 07:52:13 EDT ---
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9975 (Upcall: Added xlator options to enable
cache-invalidation) posted (#6) for review on master by soumya k
(skoduri at redhat.com)
--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-03-31 02:54:49 EDT ---
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9975 (Upcall: Added xlator options to enable
cache-invalidation) posted (#7) for review on master by soumya k
(skoduri at redhat.com)
--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-03-31 14:16:31 EDT ---
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/9975 committed in master by Kaleb KEITHLEY
(kkeithle at redhat.com)
------
commit 25f97b2788a33efcb0714ad639f8db380b864982
Author: Soumya Koduri <skoduri at redhat.com>
Date: Tue Mar 24 10:30:31 2015 +0530
Upcall: Added xlator options to enable cache-invalidation
Added two xlator options to enable cache-invalidation and set
cache-invalidation-timeout.
In addition, made few minor changes in the upcall processing code
in gfapi.
Change-Id: Ie0b32ca8348e34e3fe4f1e7df30cc925fa4aad31
BUG: 1200271
Signed-off-by: Soumya Koduri <skoduri at redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/9975
Reviewed-by: Meghana M <mmadhusu at redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com>
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins at build.gluster.com>
--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-04-10 06:35:06 EDT ---
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10194 (Upcall: Handle missing fops in the
upcall xlator) posted (#1) for review on master by soumya k
(skoduri at redhat.com)
--- Additional comment from Soumya Koduri on 2015-04-10 06:36:12 EDT ---
Internal gluster fops cannot be skipped for cache_invalidation as few of them
like self-healing will result in data change.
--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-04-10 14:37:49 EDT ---
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10194 (Upcall: Handle missing fops in the
upcall xlator) posted (#2) for review on master by soumya k
(skoduri at redhat.com)
--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-04-17 06:00:06 EDT ---
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10194 (Upcall: Handle missing fops in the
upcall xlator) posted (#3) for review on master by soumya k
(skoduri at redhat.com)
--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-04-29 14:19:26 EDT ---
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10194 (eUpcall: Handle missing fops in the
upcall xlator) posted (#4) for review on master by soumya k
(skoduri at redhat.com)
--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-04-30 01:05:36 EDT ---
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10194 (eUpcall: Handle missing fops in the
upcall xlator) posted (#5) for review on master by soumya k
(skoduri at redhat.com)
--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-04-30 01:14:03 EDT ---
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10194 (eUpcall: Handle missing fops in the
upcall xlator) posted (#6) for review on master by soumya k
(skoduri at redhat.com)
--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-04-30 04:02:04 EDT ---
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10194 (Upcall: Handle missing fops in the
upcall xlator) posted (#7) for review on master by soumya k
(skoduri at redhat.com)
--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-05-01 05:19:13 EDT ---
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/10194 (Upcall: Handle missing fops in the
upcall xlator) posted (#8) for review on master by soumya k
(skoduri at redhat.com)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200262
[Bug 1200262] Upcall framework support along with cache_invalidation
usecase handled
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200271
[Bug 1200271] Upcall: xlator options for Upcall xlator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217711
[Bug 1217711] Upcall framework support along with cache_invalidation
usecase handled
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the Bugs
mailing list