[Bugs] [Bug 1203135] New: geo-replication spuriously ignores FQDN
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Mar 18 08:31:15 UTC 2015
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203135
Bug ID: 1203135
Summary: geo-replication spuriously ignores FQDN
Product: GlusterFS
Version: 3.5.3
Component: geo-replication
Severity: high
Assignee: bugs at gluster.org
Reporter: colin.alston at gmail.com
CC: bugs at gluster.org, gluster-bugs at redhat.com
Description of problem:
Consider the following setup
---[vol1] --<georep>---> [gfs1+gfs2.site2::vol]
/
[gfs1.site1] ---
\
---[vol2] --<georep>---> [gfs1+gfs2.site3::vol]
With each cluster set created by peer probing the local hostname of the
corresponding node eg,
site1: gfs1.site1, gfs2.site1
site2: gfs1.site2, gfs2.site2
site3: gfs1.site3, gfs2.site3
Enter geo-replication, adding the replication to site1 with the full FQDN
gluster volume geo-replication vol1 gfs1.site2::vol
The remote peer will be retrieved without its FQDN as 'gfs2'. This results in
replication attempting to contact its own local peer depending on the search
domain.
More wonderful than this risk to replicating spurious data is that the peer
management tools do not provide a means to back out of this situation without
entire removing all volumes on the sites and starting from scratch. It is not
clear how (or if) it is possible change the hostname in the volume peers, or
the replication. Even if data-loss were acceptable it is impossible to change
between the hostname and FQDN on an already existing peer because it is stored
by IP address instead of the hostname it later interchangeably respects or
discards...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the Bugs
mailing list