[Bugs] [Bug 1232602] New: bug-857330/xml.t fails spuriously

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232602

            Bug ID: 1232602
           Summary: bug-857330/xml.t fails spuriously
           Product: GlusterFS
           Version: 3.7.1
         Component: tests
          Assignee: bugs at gluster.org
          Reporter: amukherj at redhat.com
                CC: bugs at gluster.org, gluster-bugs at redhat.com
        Depends On: 1227590



+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1227590 +++

Description of problem:

bug-857330/xml.t fails spuriously in test case 14

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Mainline

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-06-03 01:16:48 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11054 (tests: fix spurious failure in
bug-857330/xml.t) posted (#1) for review on master by Atin Mukherjee
(amukherj at redhat.com)

--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-06-03 02:34:47 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11055 (tests: rebalance completed should only
check the status for completed) posted (#1) for review on master by Atin
Mukherjee (amukherj at redhat.com)

--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-06-03 03:31:33 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11054 (tests: fix spurious failure in
bug-857330/xml.t) posted (#2) for review on master by Atin Mukherjee
(amukherj at redhat.com)

--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-06-03 08:32:10 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11054 (tests: fix spurious failure in
bug-857330/xml.t) posted (#3) for review on master by Atin Mukherjee
(amukherj at redhat.com)

--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-06-08 00:55:23 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11054 (tests: fix spurious failure in
bug-857330/xml.t) posted (#4) for review on master by Atin Mukherjee
(amukherj at redhat.com)

--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-06-08 00:55:38 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11055 (tests: rebalance completed should only
check the status for completed) posted (#2) for review on master by Atin
Mukherjee (amukherj at redhat.com)

--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-06-09 01:11:12 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11054 (tests: fix spurious failure in
bug-857330/xml.t) posted (#5) for review on master by Vijay Bellur
(vbellur at redhat.com)

--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-06-09 13:28:31 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11054 (tests: fix spurious failure in
bug-857330/xml.t) posted (#6) for review on master by Atin Mukherjee
(amukherj at redhat.com)

--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-06-15 00:41:22 EDT ---

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/11054 (tests: fix spurious failure in
bug-857330/xml.t) posted (#7) for review on master by Atin Mukherjee
(amukherj at redhat.com)

--- Additional comment from Anand Avati on 2015-06-16 06:01:08 EDT ---

COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/11054 committed in master by Krishnan
Parthasarathi (kparthas at redhat.com) 
------
commit f65490c5d87c4282717b7f28cfcd1fe9380c6154
Author: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Jun 3 10:40:36 2015 +0530

    tests: fix spurious failure in bug-857330/xml.t

    get-task-status () used to always return 0 *until and unless* the CLI
command
    itself fails which is unlikely. However if the CLI command fails due to
some
    reason EXPECT_WITHIN will abort.

    Change-Id: Ibe54dcdccc26b3ee003677fc3516cfed98b5c06f
    BUG: 1227590
    Signed-off-by: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com>
    Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/11054
    Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins at build.gluster.org>
    Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins at build.gluster.com>
    Reviewed-by: Krishnan Parthasarathi <kparthas at redhat.com>


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227590
[Bug 1227590] bug-857330/xml.t fails spuriously
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.