[gluster-packaging] Signed rpms for Fedora 28

[Sandro Bonazzola]

Il giorno mar 5 mar 2019 alle ore 14:40 Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle at redhat.com>
ha scritto:

> Which version are you referring to?  Where are you getting them from?
>

> I'm 99% certain all the packages on download.gluster.org are signed. (But
> I might have missed signing a set; I'm human. :-))
>

$ rpm --checksig --verbose
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/LATEST/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.4-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/LATEST/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.4-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
:
    Header SHA256 digest: OK
    Header SHA1 digest: OK
    Payload SHA256 digest: OK
    MD5 digest: OK

5.4 for Fedora 28 is missing signature. The previous one in 5.3 used to
work fine:

rpm --checksig --verbose
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/5.3/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.3-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/5.3/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.3-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
:
    Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID c2f8238c: OK
    Header SHA256 digest: OK
    Header SHA1 digest: OK
    Payload SHA256 digest: OK
    V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID c2f8238c: OK
    MD5 digest: OK




>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:33 AM Sahina Bose <sabose at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are missing signed glusterfs rpms on Fedora 28. Could you help with
>> this?
>>
>> thanks!
>> sahina
>> _______________________________________________
>> packaging mailing list
>> packaging at gluster.org
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>>
>

-- 

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV

Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>

sbonazzo at redhat.com
<https://red.ht/sig>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190305/c2dffee3/attachment.html>