From sabose at redhat.com  Tue Mar  5 13:22:58 2019
From: sabose at redhat.com (Sahina Bose)
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 18:52:58 +0530
Subject: [gluster-packaging] Signed rpms for Fedora 28
Message-ID: <CACjzOvdRkP=gouFFshAseyGKCcAPjwnNAO2W7r33q3rebxOWSw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

We are missing signed glusterfs rpms on Fedora 28. Could you help with this?

thanks!
sahina

From kkeithle at redhat.com  Tue Mar  5 13:40:43 2019
From: kkeithle at redhat.com (Kaleb Keithley)
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 08:40:43 -0500
Subject: [gluster-packaging] Signed rpms for Fedora 28
In-Reply-To: <CACjzOvdRkP=gouFFshAseyGKCcAPjwnNAO2W7r33q3rebxOWSw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACjzOvdRkP=gouFFshAseyGKCcAPjwnNAO2W7r33q3rebxOWSw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAC+Jd5BXmpxB_SEtUBhc=r-pYt2DhnT8xVXd_qty-pQ1PN_uCA@mail.gmail.com>

Which version are you referring to?  Where are you getting them from?

I'm 99% certain all the packages on download.gluster.org are signed. (But I
might have missed signing a set; I'm human. :-))

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:33 AM Sahina Bose <sabose at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We are missing signed glusterfs rpms on Fedora 28. Could you help with
> this?
>
> thanks!
> sahina
> _______________________________________________
> packaging mailing list
> packaging at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190305/bd96b57a/attachment.html>

From srangana at redhat.com  Tue Mar  5 13:59:09 2019
From: srangana at redhat.com (Shyam Ranganathan)
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 08:59:09 -0500
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.4 released
In-Reply-To: <20190227101953.GH3839@ndevos-x270>
References: <1028668680.17.1551192450784.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<20190227101953.GH3839@ndevos-x270>
Message-ID: <a0ee075a-2cc0-5f4a-7462-1bd36c4fb3b0@redhat.com>

On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org wrote:
>> SRC: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz
>> HASH: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum
> 
> Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
> Please try them out and report test results on this list.
> 
>   # yum install centos-release-gluster
>   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server

Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are awaiting a fix or revert
of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4.

The current RPMs should hence not be published.

Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can release 5.4, or
are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])?

Thanks,
Shyam

[1] Patch causing regression: https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148

[2] Proposed fix on master: https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/

From kkeithle at redhat.com  Tue Mar  5 14:21:56 2019
From: kkeithle at redhat.com (Kaleb Keithley)
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 09:21:56 -0500
Subject: [gluster-packaging] Signed rpms for Fedora 28
In-Reply-To: <CAPQRNTnQK0PX=-cA7Wyt0AaciwTjiLxcxgkKZb=OLaqsgKzRRA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACjzOvdRkP=gouFFshAseyGKCcAPjwnNAO2W7r33q3rebxOWSw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAC+Jd5BXmpxB_SEtUBhc=r-pYt2DhnT8xVXd_qty-pQ1PN_uCA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPQRNTnQK0PX=-cA7Wyt0AaciwTjiLxcxgkKZb=OLaqsgKzRRA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAC+Jd5BHzUea=ZXB2gE=tLx9OpvqC9S87eGARNvbQ-M3ydRHwQ@mail.gmail.com>

I have regenerated the repos.  I made sure the RPMs are signed. They're on
download.gluster.org now

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:57 AM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> Il giorno mar 5 mar 2019 alle ore 14:40 Kaleb Keithley <
> kkeithle at redhat.com> ha scritto:
>
>> Which version are you referring to?  Where are you getting them from?
>>
>
>> I'm 99% certain all the packages on download.gluster.org are signed.
>> (But I might have missed signing a set; I'm human. :-))
>>
>
> $ rpm --checksig --verbose
> https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/LATEST/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.4-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
>
> https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/LATEST/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.4-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
> :
>     Header SHA256 digest: OK
>     Header SHA1 digest: OK
>     Payload SHA256 digest: OK
>     MD5 digest: OK
>
> 5.4 for Fedora 28 is missing signature. The previous one in 5.3 used to
> work fine:
>
> rpm --checksig --verbose
> https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/5.3/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.3-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
>
> https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/5.3/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.3-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
> :
>     Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID c2f8238c: OK
>     Header SHA256 digest: OK
>     Header SHA1 digest: OK
>     Payload SHA256 digest: OK
>     V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID c2f8238c: OK
>     MD5 digest: OK
>
>
>
>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:33 AM Sahina Bose <sabose at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We are missing signed glusterfs rpms on Fedora 28. Could you help with
>>> this?
>>>
>>> thanks!
>>> sahina
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> packaging mailing list
>>> packaging at gluster.org
>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>>>
>>
>
> --
>
> SANDRO BONAZZOLA
>
> MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
>
> Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> sbonazzo at redhat.com
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190305/7325569e/attachment-0001.html>

From sbonazzo at redhat.com  Tue Mar  5 13:56:56 2019
From: sbonazzo at redhat.com (Sandro Bonazzola)
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 14:56:56 +0100
Subject: [gluster-packaging] Signed rpms for Fedora 28
In-Reply-To: <CAC+Jd5BXmpxB_SEtUBhc=r-pYt2DhnT8xVXd_qty-pQ1PN_uCA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACjzOvdRkP=gouFFshAseyGKCcAPjwnNAO2W7r33q3rebxOWSw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAC+Jd5BXmpxB_SEtUBhc=r-pYt2DhnT8xVXd_qty-pQ1PN_uCA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAPQRNTnQK0PX=-cA7Wyt0AaciwTjiLxcxgkKZb=OLaqsgKzRRA@mail.gmail.com>

Il giorno mar 5 mar 2019 alle ore 14:40 Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle at redhat.com>
ha scritto:

> Which version are you referring to?  Where are you getting them from?
>

> I'm 99% certain all the packages on download.gluster.org are signed. (But
> I might have missed signing a set; I'm human. :-))
>

$ rpm --checksig --verbose
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/LATEST/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.4-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/LATEST/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.4-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
:
    Header SHA256 digest: OK
    Header SHA1 digest: OK
    Payload SHA256 digest: OK
    MD5 digest: OK

5.4 for Fedora 28 is missing signature. The previous one in 5.3 used to
work fine:

rpm --checksig --verbose
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/5.3/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.3-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/5.3/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.3-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
:
    Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID c2f8238c: OK
    Header SHA256 digest: OK
    Header SHA1 digest: OK
    Payload SHA256 digest: OK
    V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID c2f8238c: OK
    MD5 digest: OK




>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:33 AM Sahina Bose <sabose at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are missing signed glusterfs rpms on Fedora 28. Could you help with
>> this?
>>
>> thanks!
>> sahina
>> _______________________________________________
>> packaging mailing list
>> packaging at gluster.org
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>>
>

-- 

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV

Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>

sbonazzo at redhat.com
<https://red.ht/sig>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190305/c2dffee3/attachment.html>

From srakonde at redhat.com  Tue Mar  5 15:10:32 2019
From: srakonde at redhat.com (Sanju Rakonde)
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 20:40:32 +0530
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.4 released
In-Reply-To: <a0ee075a-2cc0-5f4a-7462-1bd36c4fb3b0@redhat.com>
References: <1028668680.17.1551192450784.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<20190227101953.GH3839@ndevos-x270>
	<a0ee075a-2cc0-5f4a-7462-1bd36c4fb3b0@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CABj3WN3D1iv-EDi-s-6KfA+PM1DHFsZNoZJB1if0n-=BCCJZzw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 7:29 PM Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org
> wrote:
> >> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz
> >> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum
> >
> > Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
> > Please try them out and report test results on this list.
> >
> >   # yum install centos-release-gluster
> >   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
>
> Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are awaiting a fix or revert
> of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4.
>
> The current RPMs should hence not be published.
>
> Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can release 5.4, or
> are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])?
>

Shyam, I need some more time(approximately 1 day) to provide the fix. If we
have 1 more day with us, we can wait. Or else we can revert the patch[1]
and continue with the release.

>
> Thanks,
> Shyam
>
> [1] Patch causing regression:
> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148
>
> [2] Proposed fix on master:
> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/
>


-- 
Thanks,
Sanju
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190305/6cf4d605/attachment.html>

From sabose at redhat.com  Tue Mar  5 15:36:09 2019
From: sabose at redhat.com (Sahina Bose)
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 21:06:09 +0530
Subject: [gluster-packaging] Signed rpms for Fedora 28
In-Reply-To: <CAC+Jd5BHzUea=ZXB2gE=tLx9OpvqC9S87eGARNvbQ-M3ydRHwQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACjzOvdRkP=gouFFshAseyGKCcAPjwnNAO2W7r33q3rebxOWSw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAC+Jd5BXmpxB_SEtUBhc=r-pYt2DhnT8xVXd_qty-pQ1PN_uCA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPQRNTnQK0PX=-cA7Wyt0AaciwTjiLxcxgkKZb=OLaqsgKzRRA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAC+Jd5BHzUea=ZXB2gE=tLx9OpvqC9S87eGARNvbQ-M3ydRHwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACjzOvcE2GOty-x6WAse725yw5+LCNTfXDR0YXwm8soBoakT-g@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks Kaleb!

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 7:52 PM Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote:

> I have regenerated the repos.  I made sure the RPMs are signed. They're on
> download.gluster.org now
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:57 AM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Il giorno mar 5 mar 2019 alle ore 14:40 Kaleb Keithley <
>> kkeithle at redhat.com> ha scritto:
>>
>>> Which version are you referring to?  Where are you getting them from?
>>>
>>
>>> I'm 99% certain all the packages on download.gluster.org are signed.
>>> (But I might have missed signing a set; I'm human. :-))
>>>
>>
>> $ rpm --checksig --verbose
>> https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/LATEST/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.4-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
>>
>> https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/LATEST/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.4-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
>> :
>>     Header SHA256 digest: OK
>>     Header SHA1 digest: OK
>>     Payload SHA256 digest: OK
>>     MD5 digest: OK
>>
>> 5.4 for Fedora 28 is missing signature. The previous one in 5.3 used to
>> work fine:
>>
>> rpm --checksig --verbose
>> https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/5.3/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.3-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
>>
>> https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/5.3/Fedora/fedora-28/x86_64/glusterfs-5.3-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
>> :
>>     Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID c2f8238c: OK
>>     Header SHA256 digest: OK
>>     Header SHA1 digest: OK
>>     Payload SHA256 digest: OK
>>     V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID c2f8238c: OK
>>     MD5 digest: OK
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:33 AM Sahina Bose <sabose at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> We are missing signed glusterfs rpms on Fedora 28. Could you help with
>>>> this?
>>>>
>>>> thanks!
>>>> sahina
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> packaging mailing list
>>>> packaging at gluster.org
>>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> SANDRO BONAZZOLA
>>
>> MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
>>
>> Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>
>> sbonazzo at redhat.com
>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190305/b53b5cd8/attachment.html>

From srangana at redhat.com  Tue Mar  5 16:16:05 2019
From: srangana at redhat.com (Shyam Ranganathan)
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 11:16:05 -0500
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.4 released
In-Reply-To: <CABj3WN3D1iv-EDi-s-6KfA+PM1DHFsZNoZJB1if0n-=BCCJZzw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1028668680.17.1551192450784.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<20190227101953.GH3839@ndevos-x270>
	<a0ee075a-2cc0-5f4a-7462-1bd36c4fb3b0@redhat.com>
	<CABj3WN3D1iv-EDi-s-6KfA+PM1DHFsZNoZJB1if0n-=BCCJZzw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <13ee85f0-9174-b6ce-3d78-b70c624961a8@redhat.com>

On 3/5/19 10:10 AM, Sanju Rakonde wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 7:29 PM Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com
> <mailto:srangana at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>     > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +0000,
>     jenkins at build.gluster.org <mailto:jenkins at build.gluster.org> wrote:
>     >> SRC:
>     https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz
>     >> HASH:
>     https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum
>     >
>     > Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
>     > Please try them out and report test results on this list.
>     >
>     >? ?# yum install centos-release-gluster
>     >? ?# yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
> 
>     Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are awaiting a fix or revert
>     of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4.
> 
>     The current RPMs should hence not be published.
> 
>     Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can release 5.4, or
>     are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])?
> 
> 
> Shyam, I need some more time(approximately 1 day) to provide the fix. If
> we have 1 more day with us, we can wait. Or else we can revert the
> patch[1] and continue with the release.

We can wait a day, let me know tomorrow regarding the status. Thanks.

> 
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Shyam
> 
>     [1] Patch causing regression:
>     https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148
> 
>     [2] Proposed fix on master:
>     https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Sanju

From srakonde at redhat.com  Wed Mar  6 14:59:49 2019
From: srakonde at redhat.com (Sanju Rakonde)
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 20:29:49 +0530
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.4 released
In-Reply-To: <13ee85f0-9174-b6ce-3d78-b70c624961a8@redhat.com>
References: <1028668680.17.1551192450784.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<20190227101953.GH3839@ndevos-x270>
	<a0ee075a-2cc0-5f4a-7462-1bd36c4fb3b0@redhat.com>
	<CABj3WN3D1iv-EDi-s-6KfA+PM1DHFsZNoZJB1if0n-=BCCJZzw@mail.gmail.com>
	<13ee85f0-9174-b6ce-3d78-b70c624961a8@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CABj3WN1Qc2=iBxLGYqv=zDAe8y7=iSQJ9h1p4UwKymw5PxCj3Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 9:46 PM Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On 3/5/19 10:10 AM, Sanju Rakonde wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 7:29 PM Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com
> > <mailto:srangana at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >     > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +0000,
> >     jenkins at build.gluster.org <mailto:jenkins at build.gluster.org> wrote:
> >     >> SRC:
> >
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz
> >     >> HASH:
> >
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum
> >     >
> >     > Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
> >     > Please try them out and report test results on this list.
> >     >
> >     >   # yum install centos-release-gluster
> >     >   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
> >
> >     Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are awaiting a fix or
> revert
> >     of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4.
> >
> >     The current RPMs should hence not be published.
> >
> >     Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can release 5.4,
> or
> >     are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])?
> >
> >
> > Shyam, I need some more time(approximately 1 day) to provide the fix. If
> > we have 1 more day with us, we can wait. Or else we can revert the
> > patch[1] and continue with the release.
>
> We can wait a day, let me know tomorrow regarding the status. Thanks.
>

Shyam, the fix got some reviews. We are waiting for other reviewers to take
a look at it. If there are no other review comments, the patch
will  get merge tomorrow morning IST.

>
> >
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >     Shyam
> >
> >     [1] Patch causing regression:
> >     https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148
> >
> >     [2] Proposed fix on master:
> >     https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Sanju
>


-- 
Thanks,
Sanju
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190306/ee8efc24/attachment.html>

From jenkins at build.gluster.org  Wed Mar 13 02:24:44 2019
From: jenkins at build.gluster.org (jenkins at build.gluster.org)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 02:24:44 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-6.0rc1 released
Message-ID: <1536588589.15.1552443884989.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>

SRC: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/81/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc1.tar.gz
HASH: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/81/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc1.sha512sum

This release is made off jenkins-release-81

From ndevos at redhat.com  Wed Mar 13 09:38:35 2019
From: ndevos at redhat.com (Niels de Vos)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 10:38:35 +0100
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-6.0rc1
	released
In-Reply-To: <1536588589.15.1552443884989.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
References: <1536588589.15.1552443884989.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
Message-ID: <20190313093835.GN3535@ndevos-x270>

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 02:24:44AM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org wrote:
> SRC: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/81/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc1.tar.gz
> HASH: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/81/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc1.sha512sum

Packages from the CentOS Storage SIG will become available shortly in
the testing repository. Please use these packages to enable the repo and
install the glusterfs components in a 2nd step.

el7: https://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/3263/723263/centos-release-gluster6-0.9-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
el6: https://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/3265/723265/centos-release-gluster6-0.9-1.el6.centos.noarch.rpm

Once installed, the testing repo is enabled. Everything should be
available.

It is highly appreciated to let me know some results of the testing!

Thanks,
Niels

From srangana at redhat.com  Wed Mar 13 11:09:59 2019
From: srangana at redhat.com (Shyam Ranganathan)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:09:59 -0400
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.4 released
In-Reply-To: <a0ee075a-2cc0-5f4a-7462-1bd36c4fb3b0@redhat.com>
References: <1028668680.17.1551192450784.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<20190227101953.GH3839@ndevos-x270>
	<a0ee075a-2cc0-5f4a-7462-1bd36c4fb3b0@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <d50d4f72-a702-b959-fc65-766a5d3aaa22@redhat.com>

Niels, Kaleb,

We need to respin 5.4 with the 2 additional commits as follows,

commit a00953ed212a7071b152c4afccd35b92fa5a682a (HEAD -> release-5,
    core: make compute_cksum function op_version compatible

commit 8fb4631c65f28dd0a5e0304386efff3c807e64a4
    dict: handle STR_OLD data type in xdr conversions

As the current build breaks rolling upgrades, we had held back on
announcing 5.4 and are now ready with the fixes that can be used to
respin 5.4.

Let me know if I need to do anything more from my end for help with the
packaging.

Once the build is ready, we would be testing it out as usual.

NOTE: As some users have picked up 5.4 the announce would also carry a
notice, that they need to do a downserver upgrade to the latest bits
owing to the patches that have landed in addition to the existing content.

Thanks,
Shyam

On 3/5/19 8:59 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org wrote:
>>> SRC: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz
>>> HASH: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum
>>
>> Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
>> Please try them out and report test results on this list.
>>
>>   # yum install centos-release-gluster
>>   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
> 
> Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are awaiting a fix or revert
> of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4.
> 
> The current RPMs should hence not be published.
> 
> Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can release 5.4, or
> are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])?
> 
> Thanks,
> Shyam
> 
> [1] Patch causing regression: https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148
> 
> [2] Proposed fix on master: https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> 

From kkeithle at redhat.com  Wed Mar 13 12:43:38 2019
From: kkeithle at redhat.com (Kaleb Keithley)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 08:43:38 -0400
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.4 released
In-Reply-To: <CAHxyDdNQR08rNyEKGA=PU_SnXyXwoHA3hykvGe5yV9JcDyU2uA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1028668680.17.1551192450784.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<20190227101953.GH3839@ndevos-x270>
	<a0ee075a-2cc0-5f4a-7462-1bd36c4fb3b0@redhat.com>
	<d50d4f72-a702-b959-fc65-766a5d3aaa22@redhat.com>
	<CAHxyDdNQR08rNyEKGA=PU_SnXyXwoHA3hykvGe5yV9JcDyU2uA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAC+Jd5Cfb42R+2gf7-2UXDQ5w7iZ+honZqA39g3kSirkjnPSpA@mail.gmail.com>

The Version tag should be (considered) immutable. Please don't move it.

If you want to add another tag to help us remember this issue that's fine.

The other option which Shyam and I discussed was tagging v5.5.


On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:32 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
atumball at redhat.com> wrote:

> We need to tag different commit may be? So the 'git checkout v5.4' points
> to the correct commit?
>
> On Wed, 13 Mar, 2019, 4:40 PM Shyam Ranganathan, <srangana at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Niels, Kaleb,
>>
>> We need to respin 5.4 with the 2 additional commits as follows,
>>
>> commit a00953ed212a7071b152c4afccd35b92fa5a682a (HEAD -> release-5,
>>     core: make compute_cksum function op_version compatible
>>
>> commit 8fb4631c65f28dd0a5e0304386efff3c807e64a4
>>     dict: handle STR_OLD data type in xdr conversions
>>
>> As the current build breaks rolling upgrades, we had held back on
>> announcing 5.4 and are now ready with the fixes that can be used to
>> respin 5.4.
>>
>> Let me know if I need to do anything more from my end for help with the
>> packaging.
>>
>> Once the build is ready, we would be testing it out as usual.
>>
>> NOTE: As some users have picked up 5.4 the announce would also carry a
>> notice, that they need to do a downserver upgrade to the latest bits
>> owing to the patches that have landed in addition to the existing content.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shyam
>>
>> On 3/5/19 8:59 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>> > On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org
>> wrote:
>> >>> SRC:
>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz
>> >>> HASH:
>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum
>> >>
>> >> Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
>> >> Please try them out and report test results on this list.
>> >>
>> >>   # yum install centos-release-gluster
>> >>   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
>> >
>> > Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are awaiting a fix or revert
>> > of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4.
>> >
>> > The current RPMs should hence not be published.
>> >
>> > Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can release 5.4, or
>> > are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Shyam
>> >
>> > [1] Patch causing regression:
>> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148
>> >
>> > [2] Proposed fix on master:
>> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > maintainers mailing list
>> > maintainers at gluster.org
>> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> maintainers mailing list
>> maintainers at gluster.org
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190313/11f0163c/attachment-0001.html>

From atumball at redhat.com  Wed Mar 13 12:31:42 2019
From: atumball at redhat.com (Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:01:42 +0530
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.4 released
In-Reply-To: <d50d4f72-a702-b959-fc65-766a5d3aaa22@redhat.com>
References: <1028668680.17.1551192450784.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<20190227101953.GH3839@ndevos-x270>
	<a0ee075a-2cc0-5f4a-7462-1bd36c4fb3b0@redhat.com>
	<d50d4f72-a702-b959-fc65-766a5d3aaa22@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CAHxyDdNQR08rNyEKGA=PU_SnXyXwoHA3hykvGe5yV9JcDyU2uA@mail.gmail.com>

We need to tag different commit may be? So the 'git checkout v5.4' points
to the correct commit?

On Wed, 13 Mar, 2019, 4:40 PM Shyam Ranganathan, <srangana at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Niels, Kaleb,
>
> We need to respin 5.4 with the 2 additional commits as follows,
>
> commit a00953ed212a7071b152c4afccd35b92fa5a682a (HEAD -> release-5,
>     core: make compute_cksum function op_version compatible
>
> commit 8fb4631c65f28dd0a5e0304386efff3c807e64a4
>     dict: handle STR_OLD data type in xdr conversions
>
> As the current build breaks rolling upgrades, we had held back on
> announcing 5.4 and are now ready with the fixes that can be used to
> respin 5.4.
>
> Let me know if I need to do anything more from my end for help with the
> packaging.
>
> Once the build is ready, we would be testing it out as usual.
>
> NOTE: As some users have picked up 5.4 the announce would also carry a
> notice, that they need to do a downserver upgrade to the latest bits
> owing to the patches that have landed in addition to the existing content.
>
> Thanks,
> Shyam
>
> On 3/5/19 8:59 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> > On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org
> wrote:
> >>> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz
> >>> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum
> >>
> >> Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
> >> Please try them out and report test results on this list.
> >>
> >>   # yum install centos-release-gluster
> >>   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
> >
> > Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are awaiting a fix or revert
> > of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4.
> >
> > The current RPMs should hence not be published.
> >
> > Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can release 5.4, or
> > are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shyam
> >
> > [1] Patch causing regression:
> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148
> >
> > [2] Proposed fix on master:
> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/
> > _______________________________________________
> > maintainers mailing list
> > maintainers at gluster.org
> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190313/6a35455a/attachment.html>

From atumball at redhat.com  Wed Mar 13 12:50:50 2019
From: atumball at redhat.com (Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:20:50 +0530
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.4 released
In-Reply-To: <CAC+Jd5Cfb42R+2gf7-2UXDQ5w7iZ+honZqA39g3kSirkjnPSpA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1028668680.17.1551192450784.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<20190227101953.GH3839@ndevos-x270>
	<a0ee075a-2cc0-5f4a-7462-1bd36c4fb3b0@redhat.com>
	<d50d4f72-a702-b959-fc65-766a5d3aaa22@redhat.com>
	<CAHxyDdNQR08rNyEKGA=PU_SnXyXwoHA3hykvGe5yV9JcDyU2uA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAC+Jd5Cfb42R+2gf7-2UXDQ5w7iZ+honZqA39g3kSirkjnPSpA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHxyDdPAyaV1FnkPx=ffg+tK1zdYppkA3wnsiEuUaSKWpaP2pw@mail.gmail.com>

I am totally fine with v5.5, my suggestion for moving the tag was if we
consider calling 5.4 with these two patches.

Calling the release as 5.5 is totally OK, and we call it out specifically
in our version numbering scheme, as if something is very serious, we can
break 'release date' train.

-Amar

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 6:13 PM Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote:

> The Version tag should be (considered) immutable. Please don't move it.
>
> If you want to add another tag to help us remember this issue that's fine.
>
> The other option which Shyam and I discussed was tagging v5.5.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:32 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
> atumball at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> We need to tag different commit may be? So the 'git checkout v5.4' points
>> to the correct commit?
>>
>> On Wed, 13 Mar, 2019, 4:40 PM Shyam Ranganathan, <srangana at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Niels, Kaleb,
>>>
>>> We need to respin 5.4 with the 2 additional commits as follows,
>>>
>>> commit a00953ed212a7071b152c4afccd35b92fa5a682a (HEAD -> release-5,
>>>     core: make compute_cksum function op_version compatible
>>>
>>> commit 8fb4631c65f28dd0a5e0304386efff3c807e64a4
>>>     dict: handle STR_OLD data type in xdr conversions
>>>
>>> As the current build breaks rolling upgrades, we had held back on
>>> announcing 5.4 and are now ready with the fixes that can be used to
>>> respin 5.4.
>>>
>>> Let me know if I need to do anything more from my end for help with the
>>> packaging.
>>>
>>> Once the build is ready, we would be testing it out as usual.
>>>
>>> NOTE: As some users have picked up 5.4 the announce would also carry a
>>> notice, that they need to do a downserver upgrade to the latest bits
>>> owing to the patches that have landed in addition to the existing
>>> content.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shyam
>>>
>>> On 3/5/19 8:59 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>>> > On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>>> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> SRC:
>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz
>>> >>> HASH:
>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum
>>> >>
>>> >> Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
>>> >> Please try them out and report test results on this list.
>>> >>
>>> >>   # yum install centos-release-gluster
>>> >>   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
>>> >
>>> > Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are awaiting a fix or
>>> revert
>>> > of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4.
>>> >
>>> > The current RPMs should hence not be published.
>>> >
>>> > Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can release 5.4, or
>>> > are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Shyam
>>> >
>>> > [1] Patch causing regression:
>>> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148
>>> >
>>> > [2] Proposed fix on master:
>>> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > maintainers mailing list
>>> > maintainers at gluster.org
>>> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> maintainers mailing list
>>> maintainers at gluster.org
>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> maintainers mailing list
>> maintainers at gluster.org
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>
>

-- 
Amar Tumballi (amarts)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190313/ccefe84e/attachment.html>

From ndevos at redhat.com  Wed Mar 13 13:08:52 2019
From: ndevos at redhat.com (Niels de Vos)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 14:08:52 +0100
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.4 released
In-Reply-To: <CAC+Jd5Cfb42R+2gf7-2UXDQ5w7iZ+honZqA39g3kSirkjnPSpA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1028668680.17.1551192450784.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<20190227101953.GH3839@ndevos-x270>
	<a0ee075a-2cc0-5f4a-7462-1bd36c4fb3b0@redhat.com>
	<d50d4f72-a702-b959-fc65-766a5d3aaa22@redhat.com>
	<CAHxyDdNQR08rNyEKGA=PU_SnXyXwoHA3hykvGe5yV9JcDyU2uA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAC+Jd5Cfb42R+2gf7-2UXDQ5w7iZ+honZqA39g3kSirkjnPSpA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20190313130852.GP3535@ndevos-x270>

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 08:43:38AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> The Version tag should be (considered) immutable. Please don't move it.
> 
> If you want to add another tag to help us remember this issue that's fine.
> 
> The other option which Shyam and I discussed was tagging v5.5.

v5.5 or a v5.4.1 would have my preference. That also makes it clear for
packagers that build packages for other distributions and the users that
build from the source tarball.

Niels


> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:32 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
> atumball at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > We need to tag different commit may be? So the 'git checkout v5.4' points
> > to the correct commit?
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Mar, 2019, 4:40 PM Shyam Ranganathan, <srangana at redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Niels, Kaleb,
> >>
> >> We need to respin 5.4 with the 2 additional commits as follows,
> >>
> >> commit a00953ed212a7071b152c4afccd35b92fa5a682a (HEAD -> release-5,
> >>     core: make compute_cksum function op_version compatible
> >>
> >> commit 8fb4631c65f28dd0a5e0304386efff3c807e64a4
> >>     dict: handle STR_OLD data type in xdr conversions
> >>
> >> As the current build breaks rolling upgrades, we had held back on
> >> announcing 5.4 and are now ready with the fixes that can be used to
> >> respin 5.4.
> >>
> >> Let me know if I need to do anything more from my end for help with the
> >> packaging.
> >>
> >> Once the build is ready, we would be testing it out as usual.
> >>
> >> NOTE: As some users have picked up 5.4 the announce would also carry a
> >> notice, that they need to do a downserver upgrade to the latest bits
> >> owing to the patches that have landed in addition to the existing content.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Shyam
> >>
> >> On 3/5/19 8:59 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> >> > On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org
> >> wrote:
> >> >>> SRC:
> >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz
> >> >>> HASH:
> >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum
> >> >>
> >> >> Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
> >> >> Please try them out and report test results on this list.
> >> >>
> >> >>   # yum install centos-release-gluster
> >> >>   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
> >> >
> >> > Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are awaiting a fix or revert
> >> > of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4.
> >> >
> >> > The current RPMs should hence not be published.
> >> >
> >> > Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can release 5.4, or
> >> > are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Shyam
> >> >
> >> > [1] Patch causing regression:
> >> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148
> >> >
> >> > [2] Proposed fix on master:
> >> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > maintainers mailing list
> >> > maintainers at gluster.org
> >> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> maintainers mailing list
> >> maintainers at gluster.org
> >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > maintainers mailing list
> > maintainers at gluster.org
> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> >

> _______________________________________________
> packaging mailing list
> packaging at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging


From kkeithle at redhat.com  Wed Mar 13 13:09:49 2019
From: kkeithle at redhat.com (Kaleb Keithley)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:09:49 -0400
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.4 released
In-Reply-To: <CAHxyDdPAyaV1FnkPx=ffg+tK1zdYppkA3wnsiEuUaSKWpaP2pw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1028668680.17.1551192450784.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<20190227101953.GH3839@ndevos-x270>
	<a0ee075a-2cc0-5f4a-7462-1bd36c4fb3b0@redhat.com>
	<d50d4f72-a702-b959-fc65-766a5d3aaa22@redhat.com>
	<CAHxyDdNQR08rNyEKGA=PU_SnXyXwoHA3hykvGe5yV9JcDyU2uA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAC+Jd5Cfb42R+2gf7-2UXDQ5w7iZ+honZqA39g3kSirkjnPSpA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHxyDdPAyaV1FnkPx=ffg+tK1zdYppkA3wnsiEuUaSKWpaP2pw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAC+Jd5BY3HMeOeBGP4+Fk__fwkO8LthDu7ra2tw9CYB94fzE=g@mail.gmail.com>

The v5.4 tag was made and a release job was run which gave us
https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz.
If the v5.4 tag is moved then there's a logical disconnect between the tag
and _that_ tar file, or more accurately the files in that tar file.

Shyam and I discussed the merits of releasing v5.5 versus respinning builds
with patches.  Respinning builds with patches isn't uncommon. The
difference in the amount of work between one or the other is negligible. In
the end Shyam (mainly) decided to go with respinning with patches because a
full up "release" for him is a lot more work. (And we both have other
$dayjob things we need to be working on instead of endlessly spinning
releases and packages.)


On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:52 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
atumball at redhat.com> wrote:

> I am totally fine with v5.5, my suggestion for moving the tag was if we
> consider calling 5.4 with these two patches.
>
> Calling the release as 5.5 is totally OK, and we call it out specifically
> in our version numbering scheme, as if something is very serious, we can
> break 'release date' train.
>
> -Amar
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 6:13 PM Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The Version tag should be (considered) immutable. Please don't move it.
>>
>> If you want to add another tag to help us remember this issue that's fine.
>>
>> The other option which Shyam and I discussed was tagging v5.5.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:32 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
>> atumball at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> We need to tag different commit may be? So the 'git checkout v5.4'
>>> points to the correct commit?
>>>
>>> On Wed, 13 Mar, 2019, 4:40 PM Shyam Ranganathan, <srangana at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Niels, Kaleb,
>>>>
>>>> We need to respin 5.4 with the 2 additional commits as follows,
>>>>
>>>> commit a00953ed212a7071b152c4afccd35b92fa5a682a (HEAD -> release-5,
>>>>     core: make compute_cksum function op_version compatible
>>>>
>>>> commit 8fb4631c65f28dd0a5e0304386efff3c807e64a4
>>>>     dict: handle STR_OLD data type in xdr conversions
>>>>
>>>> As the current build breaks rolling upgrades, we had held back on
>>>> announcing 5.4 and are now ready with the fixes that can be used to
>>>> respin 5.4.
>>>>
>>>> Let me know if I need to do anything more from my end for help with the
>>>> packaging.
>>>>
>>>> Once the build is ready, we would be testing it out as usual.
>>>>
>>>> NOTE: As some users have picked up 5.4 the announce would also carry a
>>>> notice, that they need to do a downserver upgrade to the latest bits
>>>> owing to the patches that have landed in addition to the existing
>>>> content.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Shyam
>>>>
>>>> On 3/5/19 8:59 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>>>> > On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>>>> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>> SRC:
>>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz
>>>> >>> HASH:
>>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
>>>> >> Please try them out and report test results on this list.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   # yum install centos-release-gluster
>>>> >>   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
>>>> >
>>>> > Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are awaiting a fix or
>>>> revert
>>>> > of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4.
>>>> >
>>>> > The current RPMs should hence not be published.
>>>> >
>>>> > Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can release 5.4, or
>>>> > are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])?
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Shyam
>>>> >
>>>> > [1] Patch causing regression:
>>>> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148
>>>> >
>>>> > [2] Proposed fix on master:
>>>> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > maintainers mailing list
>>>> > maintainers at gluster.org
>>>> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>>> >
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> maintainers mailing list
>>>> maintainers at gluster.org
>>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> maintainers mailing list
>>> maintainers at gluster.org
>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Amar Tumballi (amarts)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190313/99cdfd5f/attachment-0001.html>

From srangana at redhat.com  Wed Mar 13 14:44:33 2019
From: srangana at redhat.com (Shyam Ranganathan)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 10:44:33 -0400
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.4 released
In-Reply-To: <CAC+Jd5BY3HMeOeBGP4+Fk__fwkO8LthDu7ra2tw9CYB94fzE=g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1028668680.17.1551192450784.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<20190227101953.GH3839@ndevos-x270>
	<a0ee075a-2cc0-5f4a-7462-1bd36c4fb3b0@redhat.com>
	<d50d4f72-a702-b959-fc65-766a5d3aaa22@redhat.com>
	<CAHxyDdNQR08rNyEKGA=PU_SnXyXwoHA3hykvGe5yV9JcDyU2uA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAC+Jd5Cfb42R+2gf7-2UXDQ5w7iZ+honZqA39g3kSirkjnPSpA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHxyDdPAyaV1FnkPx=ffg+tK1zdYppkA3wnsiEuUaSKWpaP2pw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAC+Jd5BY3HMeOeBGP4+Fk__fwkO8LthDu7ra2tw9CYB94fzE=g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9d473a73-57d6-0c12-5311-35d11e3b44f6@redhat.com>

On 3/13/19 9:09 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> The v5.4 tag was made and a release job was run which gave us
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz.
> If the v5.4 tag is moved then there's a logical disconnect between the
> tag and _that_ tar file, or more accurately the files in that tar file.?
> 
> Shyam and I discussed the merits of releasing v5.5 versus respinning
> builds with patches.? Respinning builds with patches isn't uncommon. The
> difference in the amount of work between one or the other is negligible.
> In the end Shyam (mainly) decided to go with respinning with patches
> because a full up "release" for him is a lot more work. (And we both
> have other $dayjob things we need to be working on instead of endlessly
> spinning releases and packages.)

Considering all comments/conversations, I think I will tag a v5.5 with
the required commits and update the 5.4 release-notes to call it 5.5
with the added changes.

Give me a couple of hours :)

> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:52 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan
> <atumball at redhat.com <mailto:atumball at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>     I am totally fine with v5.5, my suggestion for moving the tag was if
>     we consider calling 5.4 with these two patches.
> 
>     Calling the release as 5.5 is totally OK, and we call it out
>     specifically in our version numbering scheme, as if something is
>     very serious, we can break 'release date' train.
> 
>     -Amar
> 
>     On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 6:13 PM Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle at redhat.com
>     <mailto:kkeithle at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>         The Version tag should be (considered) immutable. Please don't
>         move it.
> 
>         If you want to add another tag to help us remember this issue
>         that's fine.
> 
>         The other option which Shyam and I discussed was tagging v5.5.
> 
> 
>         On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:32 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan
>         <atumball at redhat.com <mailto:atumball at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>             We need to tag different commit may be? So the 'git checkout
>             v5.4' points to the correct commit?
> 
>             On Wed, 13 Mar, 2019, 4:40 PM Shyam Ranganathan,
>             <srangana at redhat.com <mailto:srangana at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>                 Niels, Kaleb,
> 
>                 We need to respin 5.4 with the 2 additional commits as
>                 follows,
> 
>                 commit a00953ed212a7071b152c4afccd35b92fa5a682a (HEAD ->
>                 release-5,
>                 ? ? core: make compute_cksum function op_version compatible
> 
>                 commit 8fb4631c65f28dd0a5e0304386efff3c807e64a4
>                 ? ? dict: handle STR_OLD data type in xdr conversions
> 
>                 As the current build breaks rolling upgrades, we had
>                 held back on
>                 announcing 5.4 and are now ready with the fixes that can
>                 be used to
>                 respin 5.4.
> 
>                 Let me know if I need to do anything more from my end
>                 for help with the
>                 packaging.
> 
>                 Once the build is ready, we would be testing it out as
>                 usual.
> 
>                 NOTE: As some users have picked up 5.4 the announce
>                 would also carry a
>                 notice, that they need to do a downserver upgrade to the
>                 latest bits
>                 owing to the patches that have landed in addition to the
>                 existing content.
> 
>                 Thanks,
>                 Shyam
> 
>                 On 3/5/19 8:59 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>                 > On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>                 >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +0000,
>                 jenkins at build.gluster.org
>                 <mailto:jenkins at build.gluster.org> wrote:
>                 >>> SRC:
>                 https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz
>                 >>> HASH:
>                 https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum
>                 >>
>                 >> Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available
>                 for testing.
>                 >> Please try them out and report test results on this list.
>                 >>
>                 >>? ?# yum install centos-release-gluster
>                 >>? ?# yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test
>                 glusterfs-server
>                 >
>                 > Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are
>                 awaiting a fix or revert
>                 > of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4.
>                 >
>                 > The current RPMs should hence not be published.
>                 >
>                 > Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can
>                 release 5.4, or
>                 > are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])?
>                 >
>                 > Thanks,
>                 > Shyam
>                 >
>                 > [1] Patch causing regression:
>                 https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148
>                 >
>                 > [2] Proposed fix on master:
>                 https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/
>                 > _______________________________________________
>                 > maintainers mailing list
>                 > maintainers at gluster.org <mailto:maintainers at gluster.org>
>                 > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>                 >
>                 _______________________________________________
>                 maintainers mailing list
>                 maintainers at gluster.org <mailto:maintainers at gluster.org>
>                 https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> 
>             _______________________________________________
>             maintainers mailing list
>             maintainers at gluster.org <mailto:maintainers at gluster.org>
>             https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> 
> 
> 
>     -- 
>     Amar Tumballi (amarts)
> 

From guillaume.pavese at interactiv-group.com  Thu Mar 14 02:04:11 2019
From: guillaume.pavese at interactiv-group.com (Guillaume Pavese)
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 11:04:11 +0900
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-6.0rc1
	released
In-Reply-To: <20190313093835.GN3535@ndevos-x270>
References: <1536588589.15.1552443884989.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<20190313093835.GN3535@ndevos-x270>
Message-ID: <CAK6W_ACA+9LHhpnSkxNxetsLGvqQRVxZOf=fg4w==oURkEPGGQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi, I am testing gluster6-rc1 on a replica 3 oVirt cluster (engine full
replica 3 and 2 other volume replica + arbiter). They were on Gluster6-rc0.
I upgraded one host that was having the "0-epoll: Failed to dispatch
handler" bug for one of its volumes, but now all three volumes are down!
"gluster peer status" now shows its 2 other peers as connected but
rejected. Should I upgrade the other nodes? They are still on Gluster6-rc0


Guillaume Pavese
Ing?nieur Syst?me et R?seau
Interactiv-Group


On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 6:38 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 02:24:44AM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org wrote:
> > SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/81/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc1.tar.gz
> > HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/81/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc1.sha512sum
>
> Packages from the CentOS Storage SIG will become available shortly in
> the testing repository. Please use these packages to enable the repo and
> install the glusterfs components in a 2nd step.
>
> el7:
> https://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/3263/723263/centos-release-gluster6-0.9-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
> el6
> <https://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/3263/723263/centos-release-gluster6-0.9-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpmel6>:
>
> https://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/3265/723265/centos-release-gluster6-0.9-1.el6.centos.noarch.rpm
>
> Once installed, the testing repo is enabled. Everything should be
> available.
>
> It is highly appreciated to let me know some results of the testing!
>
> Thanks,
> Niels
> _______________________________________________
> packaging mailing list
> packaging at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190314/55dc3c2b/attachment.html>

From guillaume.pavese at interactiv-group.com  Thu Mar 14 02:20:23 2019
From: guillaume.pavese at interactiv-group.com (Guillaume Pavese)
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 11:20:23 +0900
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-6.0rc1
	released
In-Reply-To: <CAK6W_ACA+9LHhpnSkxNxetsLGvqQRVxZOf=fg4w==oURkEPGGQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1536588589.15.1552443884989.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<20190313093835.GN3535@ndevos-x270>
	<CAK6W_ACA+9LHhpnSkxNxetsLGvqQRVxZOf=fg4w==oURkEPGGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAK6W_ACgCfmNJg7T3TdnTAt6bTYug-eeFV3vzcMxd_30TfPyTQ@mail.gmail.com>

putting users at gluster.org in the loop

Guillaume Pavese
Ing?nieur Syst?me et R?seau
Interactiv-Group


On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 11:04 AM Guillaume Pavese <
guillaume.pavese at interactiv-group.com> wrote:

> Hi, I am testing gluster6-rc1 on a replica 3 oVirt cluster (engine full
> replica 3 and 2 other volume replica + arbiter). They were on Gluster6-rc0.
> I upgraded one host that was having the "0-epoll: Failed to dispatch
> handler" bug for one of its volumes, but now all three volumes are down!
> "gluster peer status" now shows its 2 other peers as connected but
> rejected. Should I upgrade the other nodes? They are still on Gluster6-rc0
>
>
> Guillaume Pavese
> Ing?nieur Syst?me et R?seau
> Interactiv-Group
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 6:38 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 02:24:44AM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org
>> wrote:
>> > SRC:
>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/81/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc1.tar.gz
>> > HASH:
>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/81/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc1.sha512sum
>>
>> Packages from the CentOS Storage SIG will become available shortly in
>> the testing repository. Please use these packages to enable the repo and
>> install the glusterfs components in a 2nd step.
>>
>> el7:
>> https://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/3263/723263/centos-release-gluster6-0.9-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
>> el6
>> <https://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/3263/723263/centos-release-gluster6-0.9-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpmel6>:
>>
>> https://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/3265/723265/centos-release-gluster6-0.9-1.el6.centos.noarch.rpm
>>
>> Once installed, the testing repo is enabled. Everything should be
>> available.
>>
>> It is highly appreciated to let me know some results of the testing!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Niels
>> _______________________________________________
>> packaging mailing list
>> packaging at gluster.org
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190314/bb62b723/attachment-0001.html>

From amukherj at redhat.com  Thu Mar 14 02:44:38 2019
From: amukherj at redhat.com (Atin Mukherjee)
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 08:14:38 +0530
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-6.0rc1
	released
In-Reply-To: <CAK6W_ACgCfmNJg7T3TdnTAt6bTYug-eeFV3vzcMxd_30TfPyTQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1536588589.15.1552443884989.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<20190313093835.GN3535@ndevos-x270>
	<CAK6W_ACA+9LHhpnSkxNxetsLGvqQRVxZOf=fg4w==oURkEPGGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK6W_ACgCfmNJg7T3TdnTAt6bTYug-eeFV3vzcMxd_30TfPyTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGNCGH08_3tnqCNA2X2Xbs8A1btrhyUFCe8GkqV_O4W7ShXZJA@mail.gmail.com>

If you were on rc0 and upgraded to rc1, then you are hitting BZ 1684029 I
believe. Can you please upgrade all the nodes to rc1, bump up the
op-version to 60000 (if not already done) and then restart glusterd
services to see if the peer rejection goes away?

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:51 AM Guillaume Pavese <
guillaume.pavese at interactiv-group.com> wrote:

> putting users at gluster.org in the loop
>
> Guillaume Pavese
> Ing?nieur Syst?me et R?seau
> Interactiv-Group
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 11:04 AM Guillaume Pavese <
> guillaume.pavese at interactiv-group.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, I am testing gluster6-rc1 on a replica 3 oVirt cluster (engine full
>> replica 3 and 2 other volume replica + arbiter). They were on Gluster6-rc0.
>> I upgraded one host that was having the "0-epoll: Failed to dispatch
>> handler" bug for one of its volumes, but now all three volumes are down!
>> "gluster peer status" now shows its 2 other peers as connected but
>> rejected. Should I upgrade the other nodes? They are still on Gluster6-rc0
>>
>>
>> Guillaume Pavese
>> Ing?nieur Syst?me et R?seau
>> Interactiv-Group
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 6:38 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 02:24:44AM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org
>>> wrote:
>>> > SRC:
>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/81/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc1.tar.gz
>>> > HASH:
>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/81/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc1.sha512sum
>>>
>>> Packages from the CentOS Storage SIG will become available shortly in
>>> the testing repository. Please use these packages to enable the repo and
>>> install the glusterfs components in a 2nd step.
>>>
>>> el7:
>>> https://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/3263/723263/centos-release-gluster6-0.9-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
>>> el6
>>> <https://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/3263/723263/centos-release-gluster6-0.9-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpmel6>:
>>>
>>> https://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/3265/723265/centos-release-gluster6-0.9-1.el6.centos.noarch.rpm
>>>
>>> Once installed, the testing repo is enabled. Everything should be
>>> available.
>>>
>>> It is highly appreciated to let me know some results of the testing!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Niels
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> packaging mailing list
>>> packaging at gluster.org
>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190314/683e4c6c/attachment.html>

From guillaume.pavese at interactiv-group.com  Thu Mar 14 08:03:03 2019
From: guillaume.pavese at interactiv-group.com (Guillaume Pavese)
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 17:03:03 +0900
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-6.0rc1
	released
In-Reply-To: <CAGNCGH08_3tnqCNA2X2Xbs8A1btrhyUFCe8GkqV_O4W7ShXZJA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1536588589.15.1552443884989.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<20190313093835.GN3535@ndevos-x270>
	<CAK6W_ACA+9LHhpnSkxNxetsLGvqQRVxZOf=fg4w==oURkEPGGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK6W_ACgCfmNJg7T3TdnTAt6bTYug-eeFV3vzcMxd_30TfPyTQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGNCGH08_3tnqCNA2X2Xbs8A1btrhyUFCe8GkqV_O4W7ShXZJA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAK6W_ABax=LxNbBfGLDoewZ=MNWgTPfiDKM6bu_b+shrRSSrkA@mail.gmail.com>

That worked, thanks for your help.

Guillaume Pavese
Ing?nieur Syst?me et R?seau
Interactiv-Group


On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 11:44 AM Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> wrote:

> If you were on rc0 and upgraded to rc1, then you are hitting BZ 1684029 I
> believe. Can you please upgrade all the nodes to rc1, bump up the
> op-version to 60000 (if not already done) and then restart glusterd
> services to see if the peer rejection goes away?
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:51 AM Guillaume Pavese <
> guillaume.pavese at interactiv-group.com> wrote:
>
>> putting users at gluster.org in the loop
>>
>> Guillaume Pavese
>> Ing?nieur Syst?me et R?seau
>> Interactiv-Group
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 11:04 AM Guillaume Pavese <
>> guillaume.pavese at interactiv-group.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I am testing gluster6-rc1 on a replica 3 oVirt cluster (engine full
>>> replica 3 and 2 other volume replica + arbiter). They were on Gluster6-rc0.
>>> I upgraded one host that was having the "0-epoll: Failed to dispatch
>>> handler" bug for one of its volumes, but now all three volumes are down!
>>> "gluster peer status" now shows its 2 other peers as connected but
>>> rejected. Should I upgrade the other nodes? They are still on Gluster6-rc0
>>>
>>>
>>> Guillaume Pavese
>>> Ing?nieur Syst?me et R?seau
>>> Interactiv-Group
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 6:38 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 02:24:44AM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > SRC:
>>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/81/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc1.tar.gz
>>>> > HASH:
>>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/81/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc1.sha512sum
>>>>
>>>> Packages from the CentOS Storage SIG will become available shortly in
>>>> the testing repository. Please use these packages to enable the repo and
>>>> install the glusterfs components in a 2nd step.
>>>>
>>>> el7:
>>>> https://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/3263/723263/centos-release-gluster6-0.9-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
>>>> el6
>>>> <https://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/3263/723263/centos-release-gluster6-0.9-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpmel6>:
>>>>
>>>> https://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/3265/723265/centos-release-gluster6-0.9-1.el6.centos.noarch.rpm
>>>>
>>>> Once installed, the testing repo is enabled. Everything should be
>>>> available.
>>>>
>>>> It is highly appreciated to let me know some results of the testing!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Niels
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> packaging mailing list
>>>> packaging at gluster.org
>>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> maintainers mailing list
>> maintainers at gluster.org
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190314/1faf7522/attachment.html>

From kkeithle at redhat.com  Thu Mar 14 11:15:06 2019
From: kkeithle at redhat.com (Kaleb Keithley)
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:15:06 -0400
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-6.0rc1
	released
In-Reply-To: <1536588589.15.1552443884989.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
References: <1536588589.15.1552443884989.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
Message-ID: <CAC+Jd5AXce6N4fo5BB0Fk0891t8-pFHFM+J8mi4DzecFMcO2wg@mail.gmail.com>

GlusterFS 6.0rc1 is built in Fedora 30 and Fedora 31/rawhide.

Packages for Fedora 29, RHEL 8, and Debian 9/stretch and Debian 10/buster
are at
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/6.0rc1/

Packages are signed. The public key is at
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/6/rsa.pub


On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:25 PM <jenkins at build.gluster.org> wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/81/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc1.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/81/artifact/glusterfs-6.0rc1.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-81_______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190314/5f422ad4/attachment-0001.html>

From jenkins at build.gluster.org  Fri Mar 15 13:24:42 2019
From: jenkins at build.gluster.org (jenkins at build.gluster.org)
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 13:24:42 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.5 released
Message-ID: <184043011.1.1552656282893.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>

SRC: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/82/artifact/glusterfs-5.5.tar.gz
HASH: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/82/artifact/glusterfs-5.5.sha512sum

This release is made off jenkins-release-82

From srangana at redhat.com  Fri Mar 15 13:24:51 2019
From: srangana at redhat.com (Shyam Ranganathan)
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 09:24:51 -0400
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.4 released
In-Reply-To: <9d473a73-57d6-0c12-5311-35d11e3b44f6@redhat.com>
References: <1028668680.17.1551192450784.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<20190227101953.GH3839@ndevos-x270>
	<a0ee075a-2cc0-5f4a-7462-1bd36c4fb3b0@redhat.com>
	<d50d4f72-a702-b959-fc65-766a5d3aaa22@redhat.com>
	<CAHxyDdNQR08rNyEKGA=PU_SnXyXwoHA3hykvGe5yV9JcDyU2uA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAC+Jd5Cfb42R+2gf7-2UXDQ5w7iZ+honZqA39g3kSirkjnPSpA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHxyDdPAyaV1FnkPx=ffg+tK1zdYppkA3wnsiEuUaSKWpaP2pw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAC+Jd5BY3HMeOeBGP4+Fk__fwkO8LthDu7ra2tw9CYB94fzE=g@mail.gmail.com>
	<9d473a73-57d6-0c12-5311-35d11e3b44f6@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <794455ff-524c-16ab-480b-66c3d301cce0@redhat.com>

On 3/13/19 10:44 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> On 3/13/19 9:09 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>> The v5.4 tag was made and a release job was run which gave us
>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz.
>> If the v5.4 tag is moved then there's a logical disconnect between the
>> tag and _that_ tar file, or more accurately the files in that tar file.?
>>
>> Shyam and I discussed the merits of releasing v5.5 versus respinning
>> builds with patches.? Respinning builds with patches isn't uncommon. The
>> difference in the amount of work between one or the other is negligible.
>> In the end Shyam (mainly) decided to go with respinning with patches
>> because a full up "release" for him is a lot more work. (And we both
>> have other $dayjob things we need to be working on instead of endlessly
>> spinning releases and packages.)
> 
> Considering all comments/conversations, I think I will tag a v5.5 with
> the required commits and update the 5.4 release-notes to call it 5.5
> with the added changes.
> 
> Give me a couple of hours :)

Well that took longer (sorry was out sick for some time).

5.4 is now tagged and the release tarball generated for packaging.

> 
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:52 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan
>> <atumball at redhat.com <mailto:atumball at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     I am totally fine with v5.5, my suggestion for moving the tag was if
>>     we consider calling 5.4 with these two patches.
>>
>>     Calling the release as 5.5 is totally OK, and we call it out
>>     specifically in our version numbering scheme, as if something is
>>     very serious, we can break 'release date' train.
>>
>>     -Amar
>>
>>     On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 6:13 PM Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle at redhat.com
>>     <mailto:kkeithle at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         The Version tag should be (considered) immutable. Please don't
>>         move it.
>>
>>         If you want to add another tag to help us remember this issue
>>         that's fine.
>>
>>         The other option which Shyam and I discussed was tagging v5.5.
>>
>>
>>         On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:32 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan
>>         <atumball at redhat.com <mailto:atumball at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>             We need to tag different commit may be? So the 'git checkout
>>             v5.4' points to the correct commit?
>>
>>             On Wed, 13 Mar, 2019, 4:40 PM Shyam Ranganathan,
>>             <srangana at redhat.com <mailto:srangana at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>                 Niels, Kaleb,
>>
>>                 We need to respin 5.4 with the 2 additional commits as
>>                 follows,
>>
>>                 commit a00953ed212a7071b152c4afccd35b92fa5a682a (HEAD ->
>>                 release-5,
>>                 ? ? core: make compute_cksum function op_version compatible
>>
>>                 commit 8fb4631c65f28dd0a5e0304386efff3c807e64a4
>>                 ? ? dict: handle STR_OLD data type in xdr conversions
>>
>>                 As the current build breaks rolling upgrades, we had
>>                 held back on
>>                 announcing 5.4 and are now ready with the fixes that can
>>                 be used to
>>                 respin 5.4.
>>
>>                 Let me know if I need to do anything more from my end
>>                 for help with the
>>                 packaging.
>>
>>                 Once the build is ready, we would be testing it out as
>>                 usual.
>>
>>                 NOTE: As some users have picked up 5.4 the announce
>>                 would also carry a
>>                 notice, that they need to do a downserver upgrade to the
>>                 latest bits
>>                 owing to the patches that have landed in addition to the
>>                 existing content.
>>
>>                 Thanks,
>>                 Shyam
>>
>>                 On 3/5/19 8:59 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>>                 > On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>>                 >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +0000,
>>                 jenkins at build.gluster.org
>>                 <mailto:jenkins at build.gluster.org> wrote:
>>                 >>> SRC:
>>                 https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz
>>                 >>> HASH:
>>                 https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum
>>                 >>
>>                 >> Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available
>>                 for testing.
>>                 >> Please try them out and report test results on this list.
>>                 >>
>>                 >>? ?# yum install centos-release-gluster
>>                 >>? ?# yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test
>>                 glusterfs-server
>>                 >
>>                 > Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are
>>                 awaiting a fix or revert
>>                 > of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4.
>>                 >
>>                 > The current RPMs should hence not be published.
>>                 >
>>                 > Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can
>>                 release 5.4, or
>>                 > are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])?
>>                 >
>>                 > Thanks,
>>                 > Shyam
>>                 >
>>                 > [1] Patch causing regression:
>>                 https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148
>>                 >
>>                 > [2] Proposed fix on master:
>>                 https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/
>>                 > _______________________________________________
>>                 > maintainers mailing list
>>                 > maintainers at gluster.org <mailto:maintainers at gluster.org>
>>                 > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>                 >
>>                 _______________________________________________
>>                 maintainers mailing list
>>                 maintainers at gluster.org <mailto:maintainers at gluster.org>
>>                 https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             maintainers mailing list
>>             maintainers at gluster.org <mailto:maintainers at gluster.org>
>>             https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Amar Tumballi (amarts)
>>
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> 

From kkeithle at redhat.com  Sat Mar 16 06:03:18 2019
From: kkeithle at redhat.com (Kaleb Keithley)
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2019 02:03:18 -0400
Subject: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.5 released
In-Reply-To: <184043011.1.1552656282893.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
References: <184043011.1.1552656282893.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
Message-ID: <CAC+Jd5AF1VXxKxJu3JOhzGKv7P-pQyPDdUbUViR4N-GOmw_EoQ@mail.gmail.com>

Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
Please try them out and report test results on this list.

  # yum install centos-release-gluster
  # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server

glusterfs-5.5 packages for:

* Fedora 29 are in the Fedora Updates-Testing repo. Use `dnf` to install.
Fedora packages will move to the Fedora Updates repo after a nominal
testing period. Fedora 28, Fedora 30, and Fedora 31/rawhide are at [1].

* RHEL 8 Beta are at [1].

* Debian Stretch/9 and Debian buster/10 are on download.gluster.org at [1]
(arm64 packages coming soon.)

* Xenial/16.04, Bionic/18.04, Cosmic/18.10, and Disco/19.04 are on
Launchpad at [2].

* SUSE SLES12SP4, Tumbleweed, SLES15, and Leap15 will be on OpenSUSE Build
Service at [3] soon.

I have updated all the .../LATEST symlinks.

[1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5
[2] https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-5
[3] https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 9:24 AM <jenkins at build.gluster.org> wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/82/artifact/glusterfs-5.5.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/82/artifact/glusterfs-5.5.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-82_______________________________________________
> packaging mailing list
> packaging at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190316/3441c3cb/attachment.html>

From hgowtham at redhat.com  Mon Mar 18 10:39:39 2019
From: hgowtham at redhat.com (Hari Gowtham)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:09:39 +0530
Subject: [gluster-packaging] Need el7 rc1 package of gluster
Message-ID: <CAKh1kXtye9u7EuHx19oRVSB2a6hSxA-gHBRjBjmJFygYEdjDWg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I can see that the RC1 of release 6 for centos is available only for el8.
Can we make it available for el7 and lower?

-- 
Regards,
Hari Gowtham.

From kkeithle at redhat.com  Mon Mar 18 11:13:06 2019
From: kkeithle at redhat.com (Kaleb Keithley)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 07:13:06 -0400
Subject: [gluster-packaging] Need el7 rc1 package of gluster
In-Reply-To: <CAKh1kXtye9u7EuHx19oRVSB2a6hSxA-gHBRjBjmJFygYEdjDWg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKh1kXtye9u7EuHx19oRVSB2a6hSxA-gHBRjBjmJFygYEdjDWg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAC+Jd5AcRkhQPL0WcrYkSs8wBFyAxBXjhtRWV=WbBgwMkveArg@mail.gmail.com>

There are rc1 rpms for el7 and el6* at
https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-6 and
https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/6/storage/x86_64/gluster-6/

These are the "normal" places that builds land until they are tagged for
release and propagated to the mirrors.

*client side only.


On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 6:49 AM Hari Gowtham <hgowtham at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I can see that the RC1 of release 6 for centos is available only for el8.
> Can we make it available for el7 and lower?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hari Gowtham.
> _______________________________________________
> packaging mailing list
> packaging at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190318/5df81a66/attachment.html>

From hgowtham at redhat.com  Mon Mar 18 12:25:58 2019
From: hgowtham at redhat.com (Hari Gowtham)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:55:58 +0530
Subject: [gluster-packaging] Need el7 rc1 package of gluster
In-Reply-To: <CAC+Jd5AcRkhQPL0WcrYkSs8wBFyAxBXjhtRWV=WbBgwMkveArg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKh1kXtye9u7EuHx19oRVSB2a6hSxA-gHBRjBjmJFygYEdjDWg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAC+Jd5AcRkhQPL0WcrYkSs8wBFyAxBXjhtRWV=WbBgwMkveArg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKh1kXtfDyrzjjFiOBeZuTzCyUcROZ0_tYjcxdrRTW2Vg-nCTQ@mail.gmail.com>

My bad checked it here
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/6.0rc1/CentOS/
Thanks!

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:43 PM Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> There are rc1 rpms for el7 and el6* at
> https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-6 and https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/6/storage/x86_64/gluster-6/
>
> These are the "normal" places that builds land until they are tagged for release and propagated to the mirrors.
>
> *client side only.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 6:49 AM Hari Gowtham <hgowtham at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I can see that the RC1 of release 6 for centos is available only for el8.
>> Can we make it available for el7 and lower?
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Hari Gowtham.
>> _______________________________________________
>> packaging mailing list
>> packaging at gluster.org
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging



-- 
Regards,
Hari Gowtham.

From srangana at redhat.com  Tue Mar 19 14:58:56 2019
From: srangana at redhat.com (Shyam Ranganathan)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:58:56 -0400
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.5 released
In-Reply-To: <CAC+Jd5AF1VXxKxJu3JOhzGKv7P-pQyPDdUbUViR4N-GOmw_EoQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <184043011.1.1552656282893.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<CAC+Jd5AF1VXxKxJu3JOhzGKv7P-pQyPDdUbUViR4N-GOmw_EoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <227b9a4f-ddc2-bf62-6669-a7a429fee916@redhat.com>

On 3/16/19 2:03 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
> Please try them out and report test results on this list.
> 
> ? # yum install centos-release-gluster
> ? # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server

The buildlogs servers do not yet have the RPMs for 5.5 to test. I did
try to go and use the build artifacts from
https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=25417 but as there is no
repo file, unable to install pointing to this source as the repo.

Can this be fixed, or some alternate provided, so that the packages can
be tested and reported back for publishing?

Thanks,
Shyam

From jenkins at build.gluster.org  Tue Mar 19 15:08:18 2019
From: jenkins at build.gluster.org (jenkins at build.gluster.org)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:08:18 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-6.0 released
Message-ID: <2048772039.14.1553008099425.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>

SRC: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/83/artifact/glusterfs-6.0.tar.gz
HASH: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/83/artifact/glusterfs-6.0.sha512sum

This release is made off jenkins-release-83

From atumball at redhat.com  Tue Mar 19 15:25:32 2019
From: atumball at redhat.com (Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 20:55:32 +0530
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.5 released
In-Reply-To: <227b9a4f-ddc2-bf62-6669-a7a429fee916@redhat.com>
References: <184043011.1.1552656282893.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<CAC+Jd5AF1VXxKxJu3JOhzGKv7P-pQyPDdUbUViR4N-GOmw_EoQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<227b9a4f-ddc2-bf62-6669-a7a429fee916@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CAHxyDdN7KH8g7VJDKpzqZkEOW0rfZxuufi5E-mKdx-iiZ_2AzA@mail.gmail.com>

Team,

How can we get debug info package for suse? This helps us to debug a crash
on 5.5


On Tue, 19 Mar, 2019, 8:30 PM Shyam Ranganathan, <srangana at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On 3/16/19 2:03 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
> > Please try them out and report test results on this list.
> >
> >   # yum install centos-release-gluster
> >   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
>
> The buildlogs servers do not yet have the RPMs for 5.5 to test. I did
> try to go and use the build artifacts from
> https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=25417 but as there is no
> repo file, unable to install pointing to this source as the repo.
>
> Can this be fixed, or some alternate provided, so that the packages can
> be tested and reported back for publishing?
>
> Thanks,
> Shyam
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190319/3fa63ee6/attachment.html>

From kkeithle at redhat.com  Wed Mar 20 03:28:47 2019
From: kkeithle at redhat.com (Kaleb Keithley)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 23:28:47 -0400
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.5 released
In-Reply-To: <227b9a4f-ddc2-bf62-6669-a7a429fee916@redhat.com>
References: <184043011.1.1552656282893.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<CAC+Jd5AF1VXxKxJu3JOhzGKv7P-pQyPDdUbUViR4N-GOmw_EoQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<227b9a4f-ddc2-bf62-6669-a7a429fee916@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CAC+Jd5BeKvgiqZE-jrNofXfxbeOYscagyQhe_LUSYEunXNc_zQ@mail.gmail.com>

It seems I neglected to tag the packages for testing.

I've fixed that. Hopefully the packages land on buildlogs.centos.org soon.

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:58 AM Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On 3/16/19 2:03 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
> > Please try them out and report test results on this list.
> >
> >   # yum install centos-release-gluster
> >   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
>
> The buildlogs servers do not yet have the RPMs for 5.5 to test. I did
> try to go and use the build artifacts from
> https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=25417 but as there is no
> repo file, unable to install pointing to this source as the repo.
>
> Can this be fixed, or some alternate provided, so that the packages can
> be tested and reported back for publishing?
>
> Thanks,
> Shyam
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190319/52380a3d/attachment.html>

From kkeithle at redhat.com  Wed Mar 20 03:44:01 2019
From: kkeithle at redhat.com (Kaleb Keithley)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 23:44:01 -0400
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.5 released
In-Reply-To: <CAHxyDdN7KH8g7VJDKpzqZkEOW0rfZxuufi5E-mKdx-iiZ_2AzA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <184043011.1.1552656282893.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<CAC+Jd5AF1VXxKxJu3JOhzGKv7P-pQyPDdUbUViR4N-GOmw_EoQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<227b9a4f-ddc2-bf62-6669-a7a429fee916@redhat.com>
	<CAHxyDdN7KH8g7VJDKpzqZkEOW0rfZxuufi5E-mKdx-iiZ_2AzA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAC+Jd5BOCf9cE=uf7+qyN-JCxOEjrNZwPqPh+L5TN9eA4xqPYA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:25 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
atumball at redhat.com> wrote:

> Team,
>
> How can we get debug info package for suse? This helps us to debug a crash
> on 5.5
>

I have enabled debuginfo for the SUSE packages. Most seem to be rebuilding.
If you don't find the debuginfo for the SUSE you need ping me and I'll kick
it.


>
>
> On Tue, 19 Mar, 2019, 8:30 PM Shyam Ranganathan, <srangana at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/16/19 2:03 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>> > Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
>> > Please try them out and report test results on this list.
>> >
>> >   # yum install centos-release-gluster
>> >   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
>>
>> The buildlogs servers do not yet have the RPMs for 5.5 to test. I did
>> try to go and use the build artifacts from
>> https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=25417 but as there is no
>> repo file, unable to install pointing to this source as the repo.
>>
>> Can this be fixed, or some alternate provided, so that the packages can
>> be tested and reported back for publishing?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shyam
>> _______________________________________________
>> maintainers mailing list
>> maintainers at gluster.org
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190319/7a8ffe22/attachment.html>

From kkeithle at redhat.com  Wed Mar 20 04:43:36 2019
From: kkeithle at redhat.com (Kaleb Keithley)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:43:36 -0400
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.5 released
In-Reply-To: <CAD+dzQdy_ziXcknWE8-OKjvHu=b07bg0VWnwsgOh_sLzzN3O5A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <184043011.1.1552656282893.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<CAC+Jd5AF1VXxKxJu3JOhzGKv7P-pQyPDdUbUViR4N-GOmw_EoQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<227b9a4f-ddc2-bf62-6669-a7a429fee916@redhat.com>
	<CAHxyDdN7KH8g7VJDKpzqZkEOW0rfZxuufi5E-mKdx-iiZ_2AzA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAC+Jd5BOCf9cE=uf7+qyN-JCxOEjrNZwPqPh+L5TN9eA4xqPYA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAD+dzQdy_ziXcknWE8-OKjvHu=b07bg0VWnwsgOh_sLzzN3O5A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAC+Jd5B9b+1+Euu0iLggdveruUqwfHmC00qOZ0ybyp_vM9QrKQ@mail.gmail.com>

debuginfo packages from the rebuild are at
https://build.opensuse.org/package/binaries/home:glusterfs:SLES15-5/GlusterFS-5.5/SLE_15
.

They're not yet in the repo at
https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/glusterfs:/SLES15-5/SLE_15/x86_64/.
I guess we're waiting for OBS to "publish" them.

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:15 AM Artem Russakovskii <archon810 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Kaleb,
>
> Should we expect to see debuginfo packages here
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/glusterfs:/Leap15-5/openSUSE_Leap_15.0/x86_64/
> or somewhere else?
>
> Sincerely,
> Artem
>
> --
> Founder, Android Police <http://www.androidpolice.com>, APK Mirror
> <http://www.apkmirror.com/>, Illogical Robot LLC
> beerpla.net | +ArtemRussakovskii
> <https://plus.google.com/+ArtemRussakovskii> | @ArtemR
> <http://twitter.com/ArtemR>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 8:44 PM Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:25 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
>> atumball at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Team,
>>>
>>> How can we get debug info package for suse? This helps us to debug a
>>> crash on 5.5
>>>
>>
>> I have enabled debuginfo for the SUSE packages. Most seem to be
>> rebuilding. If you don't find the debuginfo for the SUSE you need ping me
>> and I'll kick it.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 19 Mar, 2019, 8:30 PM Shyam Ranganathan, <srangana at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/16/19 2:03 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>>>> > Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
>>>> > Please try them out and report test results on this list.
>>>> >
>>>> >   # yum install centos-release-gluster
>>>> >   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
>>>>
>>>> The buildlogs servers do not yet have the RPMs for 5.5 to test. I did
>>>> try to go and use the build artifacts from
>>>> https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=25417 but as there is no
>>>> repo file, unable to install pointing to this source as the repo.
>>>>
>>>> Can this be fixed, or some alternate provided, so that the packages can
>>>> be tested and reported back for publishing?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Shyam
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> maintainers mailing list
>>>> maintainers at gluster.org
>>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190320/64553801/attachment-0001.html>

From kkeithle at redhat.com  Wed Mar 20 10:17:16 2019
From: kkeithle at redhat.com (Kaleb Keithley)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:47:16 +0530
Subject: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-6.0 released
In-Reply-To: <2048772039.14.1553008099425.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
References: <2048772039.14.1553008099425.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
Message-ID: <CAC+Jd5CY280+TX6XVF_CUeift1mV21--LbjbJdOFYXjEBJe61A@mail.gmail.com>

preliminary status update??

glusterfs-6.0 packages for:

* CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing at [1] and [2].  Please
try them out and report test results on this list.

* Fedora 30 and 31 are in the Fedora Updates-Testing or rawhide repo. Use
`dnf` to install. Fedora packages will move to the Fedora Updates repo
after a nominal testing period. Fedora 28 and Fedora 29 are at [3].

* RHEL 8 Beta are at [3].

* Debian Stretch/9 and Debian buster/10 are at [3] (arm64 packages coming
soon.)

Ubuntu and SUSE packages are still in progress.

I have _NOT_ updated the .../LATEST symlinks yet.

[1] https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-6/
[2] https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/6/storage/x86_64/gluster-6/
[3] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/6
<https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5>
<https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs>

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 8:38 PM <jenkins at build.gluster.org> wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/83/artifact/glusterfs-6.0.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/83/artifact/glusterfs-6.0.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-83_______________________________________________
> packaging mailing list
> packaging at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190320/43c85736/attachment.html>

From kkeithle at redhat.com  Thu Mar 21 07:03:44 2019
From: kkeithle at redhat.com (Kaleb Keithley)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 12:33:44 +0530
Subject: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-6.0 released
In-Reply-To: <2048772039.14.1553008099425.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
References: <2048772039.14.1553008099425.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
Message-ID: <CAC+Jd5AMmpWyBd0L3b9YHEnQH1OMjZ9SJVFFdJxh0j7=qYQXDA@mail.gmail.com>

glusterfs-6.0 packages for:

* CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing at [1]. Please try them
out and report test results on this list. After someone reports that they
have tested them then they will be tagged for release.

* Fedora 30 and Fedora 31/rawhide are in the Fedora Updates-Testing and
rawhide repos. Use `dnf` to install. Fedora packages will move to the
Fedora Updates repo after a nominal testing period. Fedora 28 and Fedora 29
are at [2].

* RHEL 8 Beta are at [2].

* Debian Stretch/9 and Debian buster/10 are at [2] (arm64 packages coming
soon.)

* Bionic/18.04, Cosmic/18.10, and Disco/19.04 are on Launchpad at [3].

* SUSE SLES12SP4, Tumbleweed, SLES15, and Leap15.1 are on OpenSUSE Build
Service at [4].

I have _NOT_ updated the top-level LATEST symlink. I will wait for the
public announcement before changing it from 5 to 6.

[1]
https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/[67]/storage/{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64}/gluster-6
[2] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/6
<https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5>
[3] https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-6
<https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-5>
[4] https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 8:38 PM <jenkins at build.gluster.org> wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/83/artifact/glusterfs-6.0.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/83/artifact/glusterfs-6.0.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-83_______________________________________________
> packaging mailing list
> packaging at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190321/0d88e230/attachment.html>

From srangana at redhat.com  Thu Mar 21 10:55:47 2019
From: srangana at redhat.com (Shyam Ranganathan)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 06:55:47 -0400
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.5 released
In-Reply-To: <CAC+Jd5BeKvgiqZE-jrNofXfxbeOYscagyQhe_LUSYEunXNc_zQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <184043011.1.1552656282893.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<CAC+Jd5AF1VXxKxJu3JOhzGKv7P-pQyPDdUbUViR4N-GOmw_EoQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<227b9a4f-ddc2-bf62-6669-a7a429fee916@redhat.com>
	<CAC+Jd5BeKvgiqZE-jrNofXfxbeOYscagyQhe_LUSYEunXNc_zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <871e5752-e9f6-ae20-718c-1f0e60727463@redhat.com>

On 3/19/19 11:28 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> It seems I neglected to tag the packages for testing.
> 
> I've fixed that. Hopefully the packages land on buildlogs.centos.org
> <http://buildlogs.centos.org> soon.

Tested, passed and can be released.

Thanks Kaleb!

> 
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:58 AM Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com
> <mailto:srangana at redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 3/16/19 2:03 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>     > Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
>     > Please try them out and report test results on this list.
>     >
>     > ? # yum install centos-release-gluster
>     > ? # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
> 
>     The buildlogs servers do not yet have the RPMs for 5.5 to test. I did
>     try to go and use the build artifacts from
>     https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=25417 but as there is no
>     repo file, unable to install pointing to this source as the repo.
> 
>     Can this be fixed, or some alternate provided, so that the packages can
>     be tested and reported back for publishing?
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Shyam
> 

From kkeithle at redhat.com  Thu Mar 21 11:15:15 2019
From: kkeithle at redhat.com (Kaleb Keithley)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 16:45:15 +0530
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.5 released
In-Reply-To: <871e5752-e9f6-ae20-718c-1f0e60727463@redhat.com>
References: <184043011.1.1552656282893.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<CAC+Jd5AF1VXxKxJu3JOhzGKv7P-pQyPDdUbUViR4N-GOmw_EoQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<227b9a4f-ddc2-bf62-6669-a7a429fee916@redhat.com>
	<CAC+Jd5BeKvgiqZE-jrNofXfxbeOYscagyQhe_LUSYEunXNc_zQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<871e5752-e9f6-ae20-718c-1f0e60727463@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CAC+Jd5Ab+h_v7=rf-CLo4+GSL7ExbpZHrhiswgB3T+YdQv92ug@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 4:25 PM Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On 3/19/19 11:28 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > It seems I neglected to tag the packages for testing.
> >
> > I've fixed that. Hopefully the packages land on buildlogs.centos.org
> > <http://buildlogs.centos.org> soon.
>
> Tested, passed and can be released.
>

packages are tagged for release. IIRC they should be on the mirrors by
Monday.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190321/918089d5/attachment.html>

From srangana at redhat.com  Mon Mar 25 14:13:55 2019
From: srangana at redhat.com (Shyam Ranganathan)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:13:55 -0400
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-6.0 released
In-Reply-To: <CAC+Jd5AMmpWyBd0L3b9YHEnQH1OMjZ9SJVFFdJxh0j7=qYQXDA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2048772039.14.1553008099425.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<CAC+Jd5AMmpWyBd0L3b9YHEnQH1OMjZ9SJVFFdJxh0j7=qYQXDA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2672c72b-31b9-5ab1-7fbc-ac6c60f0f5c6@redhat.com>

On 3/21/19 3:03 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> glusterfs-6.0 packages for:
> 
> * CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing at [1]. Please try
> them out and report test results on this list. After someone reports
> that they have tested them then they will be tagged for release.

Tested the CentOS bits, things work as expected and can be marked for a
release.

Also, can move the LATEST in d.g.o to point to 6.0, as relase notes and
upgrade guides are in place, and release announcement would follow
sometime later today.

> 
> * Fedora 30 and Fedora 31/rawhide are in the Fedora Updates-Testing and
> rawhide repos. Use `dnf` to install. Fedora packages will move to the
> Fedora Updates repo after a nominal testing period. Fedora 28 and Fedora
> 29 are at [2].
> 
> * RHEL 8 Beta are at [2].
> 
> * Debian Stretch/9 and Debian buster/10 are at [2] (arm64 packages
> coming soon.)
> 
> * Bionic/18.04, Cosmic/18.10, and Disco/19.04 are on Launchpad at [3].
> 
> * SUSE SLES12SP4, Tumbleweed, SLES15, and Leap15.1 are on OpenSUSE Build
> Service at [4].
> 
> I have _NOT_ updated the top-level LATEST symlink. I will wait for the
> public announcement before changing it from 5 to 6.
> 
> [1]
> https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/[67]/storage/{x86_64,ppc64le,aarch64}/gluster-6
> [2] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/6
> <https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5>
> [3] https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-6
> <https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-5>
> [4] https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs
> 
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 8:38 PM <jenkins at build.gluster.org
> <mailto:jenkins at build.gluster.org>> wrote:
> 
>     SRC:
>     https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/83/artifact/glusterfs-6.0.tar.gz
>     HASH:
>     https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/83/artifact/glusterfs-6.0.sha512sum
> 
>     This release is made off
>     jenkins-release-83_______________________________________________
>     packaging mailing list
>     packaging at gluster.org <mailto:packaging at gluster.org>
>     https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> 

From kkeithle at redhat.com  Mon Mar 25 14:29:03 2019
From: kkeithle at redhat.com (Kaleb Keithley)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:29:03 -0400
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-6.0 released
In-Reply-To: <2672c72b-31b9-5ab1-7fbc-ac6c60f0f5c6@redhat.com>
References: <2048772039.14.1553008099425.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<CAC+Jd5AMmpWyBd0L3b9YHEnQH1OMjZ9SJVFFdJxh0j7=qYQXDA@mail.gmail.com>
	<2672c72b-31b9-5ab1-7fbc-ac6c60f0f5c6@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <CAC+Jd5BAWAEx_b9DqYEbjjTbVn-jgN8A7LXzyfbAgbTP0cGCcw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:13 AM Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On 3/21/19 3:03 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > glusterfs-6.0 packages for:
> >
> > * CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing at [1]. Please try
> > them out and report test results on this list. After someone reports
> > that they have tested them then they will be tagged for release.
>
> Tested the CentOS bits, things work as expected and can be marked for a
> release.
>
> Also, can move the LATEST in d.g.o to point to 6.0, as relase notes and
> upgrade guides are in place, and release announcement would follow
> sometime later today.
>

CentOS packages have been tagged for release.

The top-level LATEST symlink has been moved to -> .../6/6.0

--

Kaleb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190325/8c92f539/attachment.html>

From jenkins at build.gluster.org  Wed Mar 27 22:12:28 2019
From: jenkins at build.gluster.org (jenkins at build.gluster.org)
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 22:12:28 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-4.1.8 released
Message-ID: <1405819149.30.1553724748927.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>

SRC: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/84/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.8.tar.gz
HASH: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/84/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.8.sha512sum

This release is made off jenkins-release-84

From kkeithle at redhat.com  Thu Mar 28 11:27:19 2019
From: kkeithle at redhat.com (Kaleb Keithley)
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 07:27:19 -0400
Subject: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-4.1.8 released
In-Reply-To: <1405819149.30.1553724748927.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
References: <1405819149.30.1553724748927.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
Message-ID: <CAC+Jd5CaLCLNKnJbUgZuMQyw41VQsCzFJftxvz1zQifFWYHVSQ@mail.gmail.com>

glusterfs-4.1.8 packages for:

* Fedora 28 are in the Fedora Updates-Testing or Rawhide
repo. Use `dnf` to install. Fedora packages will move to the Fedora
Updates repo after a nominal testing period. Fedora 29, 30, and 31 packages
are at [1].

* Debian Stretch/9 and Buster/10(Sid) are on download.gluster.org at [1]
(arm64 packages coming soon.)

* Xenial/16.04, Bionic/18.04, Cosmic/18.10, and Disco/19.04 are on
Launchpad at [2].

* SUSE SLES12SP3, SLES12SP4, Tumbleweed, SLES15, Leap15, and Leap15.1 are
on OpenSUSE Build
Service at [3].

[1] https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/4.1
[2] https://launchpad.net/~gluster/+archive/ubuntu/glusterfs-4.1
[3] https://build.opensuse.org/project/subprojects/home:glusterfs


On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:12 PM <jenkins at build.gluster.org> wrote:

> SRC:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/84/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.8.tar.gz
> HASH:
> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/84/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.8.sha512sum
>
> This release is made off
> jenkins-release-84_______________________________________________
> packaging mailing list
> packaging at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190328/890fb5ea/attachment.html>

From ndevos at redhat.com  Thu Mar 28 12:05:46 2019
From: ndevos at redhat.com (Niels de Vos)
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:05:46 +0100
Subject: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-4.1.8 released
In-Reply-To: <1405819149.30.1553724748927.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
References: <1405819149.30.1553724748927.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
Message-ID: <20190328120546.GC2572@ndevos-x270.lan.nixpanic.net>

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:12:28PM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org wrote:
> SRC: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/84/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.8.tar.gz
> HASH: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/84/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.8.sha512sum
> 
> This release is made off jenkins-release-84

Packages from the CentOS Storage SIG (el6 + el7) should land in the
testing repository within the next hour or so. Please check them out and
provide any results of the testing:

   # yum install centos-release-gluster41
   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster*-test glusterfs-server

Thanks,
Niels
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190328/dabc9e54/attachment.sig>

From srangana at redhat.com  Thu Mar 28 14:44:23 2019
From: srangana at redhat.com (Shyam Ranganathan)
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:44:23 -0400
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-4.1.8
 released
In-Reply-To: <20190328120546.GC2572@ndevos-x270.lan.nixpanic.net>
References: <1405819149.30.1553724748927.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<20190328120546.GC2572@ndevos-x270.lan.nixpanic.net>
Message-ID: <95736524-09e0-71af-0139-612d97f2742f@redhat.com>

On 3/28/19 8:05 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:12:28PM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org wrote:
>> SRC: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/84/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.8.tar.gz
>> HASH: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/84/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.8.sha512sum
>>
>> This release is made off jenkins-release-84
> 
> Packages from the CentOS Storage SIG (el6 + el7) should land in the
> testing repository within the next hour or so. Please check them out and
> provide any results of the testing:

Tested install and a short volume creation, data addition test, packages
look fine and can be marked for release.

> 
>    # yum install centos-release-gluster41
>    # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster*-test glusterfs-server
> 
> Thanks,
> Niels
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> 

From ndevos at redhat.com  Thu Mar 28 15:12:48 2019
From: ndevos at redhat.com (Niels de Vos)
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:12:48 +0100
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-4.1.8
 released
In-Reply-To: <95736524-09e0-71af-0139-612d97f2742f@redhat.com>
References: <1405819149.30.1553724748927.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<20190328120546.GC2572@ndevos-x270.lan.nixpanic.net>
	<95736524-09e0-71af-0139-612d97f2742f@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20190328151248.GF2572@ndevos-x270.lan.nixpanic.net>

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:44:23AM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> On 3/28/19 8:05 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:12:28PM +0000, jenkins at build.gluster.org wrote:
> >> SRC: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/84/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.8.tar.gz
> >> HASH: https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/84/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.8.sha512sum
> >>
> >> This release is made off jenkins-release-84
> > 
> > Packages from the CentOS Storage SIG (el6 + el7) should land in the
> > testing repository within the next hour or so. Please check them out and
> > provide any results of the testing:
> 
> Tested install and a short volume creation, data addition test, packages
> look fine and can be marked for release.

Thanks! Marked for release now, the next sign+push scheduled by the
CentOS team is on Monday (European) morning. Expect the packages to be
available later that day.

Niels
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190328/f3b1661a/attachment.sig>

From archon810 at gmail.com  Wed Mar 20 04:15:44 2019
From: archon810 at gmail.com (Artem Russakovskii)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 04:15:44 -0000
Subject: [gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.5 released
In-Reply-To: <CAC+Jd5BOCf9cE=uf7+qyN-JCxOEjrNZwPqPh+L5TN9eA4xqPYA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <184043011.1.1552656282893.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-el7.rht.gluster.org>
	<CAC+Jd5AF1VXxKxJu3JOhzGKv7P-pQyPDdUbUViR4N-GOmw_EoQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<227b9a4f-ddc2-bf62-6669-a7a429fee916@redhat.com>
	<CAHxyDdN7KH8g7VJDKpzqZkEOW0rfZxuufi5E-mKdx-iiZ_2AzA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAC+Jd5BOCf9cE=uf7+qyN-JCxOEjrNZwPqPh+L5TN9eA4xqPYA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD+dzQdy_ziXcknWE8-OKjvHu=b07bg0VWnwsgOh_sLzzN3O5A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Kaleb,

Should we expect to see debuginfo packages here
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/glusterfs:/Leap15-5/openSUSE_Leap_15.0/x86_64/
or somewhere else?

Sincerely,
Artem

--
Founder, Android Police <http://www.androidpolice.com>, APK Mirror
<http://www.apkmirror.com/>, Illogical Robot LLC
beerpla.net | +ArtemRussakovskii
<https://plus.google.com/+ArtemRussakovskii> | @ArtemR
<http://twitter.com/ArtemR>


On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 8:44 PM Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:25 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <
> atumball at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Team,
>>
>> How can we get debug info package for suse? This helps us to debug a
>> crash on 5.5
>>
>
> I have enabled debuginfo for the SUSE packages. Most seem to be
> rebuilding. If you don't find the debuginfo for the SUSE you need ping me
> and I'll kick it.
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 19 Mar, 2019, 8:30 PM Shyam Ranganathan, <srangana at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/16/19 2:03 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>>> > Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing.
>>> > Please try them out and report test results on this list.
>>> >
>>> >   # yum install centos-release-gluster
>>> >   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server
>>>
>>> The buildlogs servers do not yet have the RPMs for 5.5 to test. I did
>>> try to go and use the build artifacts from
>>> https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=25417 but as there is no
>>> repo file, unable to install pointing to this source as the repo.
>>>
>>> Can this be fixed, or some alternate provided, so that the packages can
>>> be tested and reported back for publishing?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shyam
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> maintainers mailing list
>>> maintainers at gluster.org
>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20190320/a0f8e517/attachment.html>