[gluster-packaging] [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-3.12.7 released

Jiffin Tony Thottan jthottan at redhat.com
Thu Mar 22 06:59:44 UTC 2018



On Wednesday 21 March 2018 09:06 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:18 AM, Shyam Ranganathan 
> <srangana at redhat.com <mailto:srangana at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 03/20/2018 01:10 PM, Jiffin Thottan wrote:
>     > Hi Shyam,
>     >
>     > Actually I planned to do the release on March 8th(posted the
>     release note on that day). But it didn't happen.
>     > I didn't merge any patches post sending the release note(blocker
>     bug had some merge conflict issue on that so I skipped AFAIR).
>     > I performed 3.12.7 tagging yesterday and ran the build job today.
>     >
>     > Can u please provide a suggestion here ? Do I need to perform a
>     3.12.7-1 for the blocker bug ?
>
>     I see that the bug is marked against the tracker, but is not a
>     regression or an issue that is serious enough that it cannot wait for
>     the next minor release.
>
>     Copied Atin to the mail, who opened that issue for his comments. If he
>     agrees, let's get this moving and get the fix into the next minor
>     release.
>
>
> Even though it's not a regression and a day 1 bug with brick 
> multiplexing, the issue is severe enough to consider this to be fixed 
> *asap* . In this scenario, if you're running a multi node cluster with 
> brick multiplexing enabled and one node down and there're some volume 
> operations performed and post that when the node comes back, brick 
> processes fail to come up.

Issue is impact only with glusterd, whether any other component needs 
this fix?
If it is issue not report from upstream user/community, I prefer to take 
it for next release.

Regards,
Jiffin

>
>     >
>     > --
>     > Regards,
>     > Jiffin
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > ----- Original Message -----
>     > From: "Shyam Ranganathan" <srangana at redhat.com
>     <mailto:srangana at redhat.com>>
>     > To: jenkins at build.gluster.org
>     <mailto:jenkins at build.gluster.org>, packaging at gluster.org
>     <mailto:packaging at gluster.org>, maintainers at gluster.org
>     <mailto:maintainers at gluster.org>
>     > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 9:06:57 PM
>     > Subject: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-3.12.7 released
>     >
>     > On 03/20/2018 11:19 AM, jenkins at build.gluster.org
>     <mailto:jenkins at build.gluster.org> wrote:
>     >> SRC:
>     https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/47/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.7.tar.gz
>     <https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/47/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.7.tar.gz>
>     >> HASH:
>     https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/47/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.7.sha512sum
>     <https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/47/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.7.sha512sum>
>     >>
>     >> This release is made off jenkins-release-47
>     >
>     > Jiffin, there are about 6 patches ready in the 3.12 queue, that
>     are not
>     > merged for this release, why?
>     >
>     https://review.gluster.org/#/projects/glusterfs,dashboards/dashboard:3-12-dashboard
>     <https://review.gluster.org/#/projects/glusterfs,dashboards/dashboard:3-12-dashboard>
>     >
>     > The tracker bug for 3.12.7 calls out
>     > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543708
>     <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543708> as a
>     blocker, and
>     > has a patch, which is not merged.
>     >
>     > Was this some test packaging job?
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> maintainers mailing list
>     >> maintainers at gluster.org <mailto:maintainers at gluster.org>
>     >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>     <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers>
>     >>
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > maintainers mailing list
>     > maintainers at gluster.org <mailto:maintainers at gluster.org>
>     > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>     <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers>
>     >
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20180322/41439ae8/attachment.html>


More information about the packaging mailing list