[Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 6.1: Tagged!

Shyam Ranganathan srangana at redhat.com
Wed Apr 17 18:31:55 UTC 2019


Is now tagged and being packaged. If anyone gets a chance, please test
the packages from CentOS SIG, as I am unavailable for the next 4 days.

Thanks,
Shyam
On 4/16/19 9:53 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> Status: Tagging pending
> 
> Waiting on patches:
> (Kotresh/Atin) - glusterd: fix loading ctime in client graph logic
>   https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22579
> 
> Following patches will not be taken in if CentOS regression does not
> pass by tomorrow morning Eastern TZ,
> (Pranith/KingLongMee) - cluster-syncop: avoid duplicate unlock of
> inodelk/entrylk
>   https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22385
> (Aravinda) - geo-rep: IPv6 support
>   https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22488
> (Aravinda) - geo-rep: fix integer config validation
>   https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22489
> 
> Tracker bug status:
> (Ravi) - Bug 1693155 - Excessive AFR messages from gluster showing in
> RHGSWA.
>   All patches are merged, but none of the patches adds the "Fixes"
> keyword, assume this is an oversight and that the bug is fixed in this
> release.
> 
> (Atin) - Bug 1698131 - multiple glusterfsd processes being launched for
> the same brick, causing transport endpoint not connected
>   No work has occurred post logs upload to bug, restart of bircks and
> possibly glusterd is the existing workaround when the bug is hit. Moving
> this out of the tracker for 6.1.
> 
> (Xavi) - Bug 1699917 - I/O error on writes to a disperse volume when
> replace-brick is executed
>   Very recent bug (15th April), does not seem to have any critical data
> corruption or service availability issues, planning on not waiting for
> the fix in 6.1
> 
> - Shyam
> On 4/6/19 4:38 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>> Hi Mohit,
>>
>> https://review.gluster.org/22495 should get into 6.1 as it’s a
>> regression. Can you please attach the respective bug to the tracker Ravi
>> pointed out?
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 at 12:00, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com
>> <mailto:ravishankar at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Tracker bug is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692394, in
>>     case anyone wants to add blocker bugs.
>>
>>
>>     On 05/04/19 8:03 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>>     > Hi,
>>     >
>>     > Expected tagging date for release-6.1 is on April, 10th, 2019.
>>     >
>>     > Please ensure required patches are backported and also are passing
>>     > regressions and are appropriately reviewed for easy merging and
>>     tagging
>>     > on the date.
>>     >
>>     > Thanks,
>>     > Shyam
>>     > _______________________________________________
>>     > Gluster-devel mailing list
>>     > Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>>     > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Gluster-devel mailing list
>>     Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>>     https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> - Atin (atinm)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 


More information about the maintainers mailing list