[Gluster-Maintainers] Coding Standard: Automation

Thu May 3 14:06:29 UTC 2018

All,

We are left with < 24hrs before branch out as Shyam called out in another
thread (4.1 Scope), As 'coding standard' is a blocker for that, I would
like all of you to add the sample code snippet you like to run it through
coding standard to nigel's repo, and open an issue (or PR) to fix
.clang-format to make it closer to coding standard we agree upon.

-Amar

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:49 PM, Nigel Babu <nigelb at redhat.com> wrote:

> I hope I've made the changes that Jeff's recommended in the first comment
> correctly[1]. Xavi, I've not pulled in any of your suggestions yet, because
> I figured you'd want to see the output and send suggestions.
>
> Please send pull requests to the .clang-format file (and only that file)
> for anything I've missed or anything you think needs changing. I'll do the
> re-generation so we're not stuck with merge conflicts.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/nigelbabu/clang-format-sample/commit/
> 733394939034ff9baaf579e7f327bdd078f204ef
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:58 PM, <atumball at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Planning to postpone this meeting, and idea is to work in more
>> collaborated way off-line, instead of being in a meeting. we believe it
>> would give everyone (those who didn't attend) too a fair chance to submit
>> their opinion.
>>
>> For now, we will continue with Nigel's clang-format repo for this to
>> experiment with different options. [https://github.com/nigelbabu/
>> clang-format-sample]
>>
>> The plan on this is to go with a sample gluster file, which would have
>> complex macros, a call with STACK_WIND/UNWIND function call. A switch case,
>> a for loop, a do/while loop. Also a list_for_each loop. Have locked region.
>> A sample 4-5 level depth if/else checks, etc.
>>
>> With this sample file, having the .clang-format decided as either
>> Chromium or Mozilla as a base (with IndentSize set to 4 space), would be a
>> good start. We will also make sure to have all the agreed points in
>> bugzilla, and add it to clang-format file, and also regenerate the sample
>> file. So, everyone gets an idea how the target file would look like. If
>> everyone agrees, by the end of the week, we will have an agreement, so we
>> can go ahead and make this possible before 4.1 release branching. (So, our
>> backport efforts will be reduced drastically).
>>
>> -Amar
>>
>> Coding Standard: Automation
>> BJ: https://bluejeans.com/205933580
>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbluejeans.com%2F205933580&sa=D&ust=1524475718810000&usg=AFQjCNGTaaNTzaWd-W-uynMJetu6B5iKrw>
>>
>> We will talk and come to agreement on https://bugzilla.redhat.com
>> /show_bug.cgi?id=1564149
>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.redhat.com%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D1564149&sa=D&ust=1524475718811000&usg=AFQjCNFdx9TMiO-6fNfyyQFlI-P_1ewpHg>
>>
>> It was agreed that we will go ahead with format change automation, so,
>> goal of this meeting is to pick the right options.
>>
>> Goal is to get gluster's own `.clang-format` file. Once that file is
>> agreed upon, we will go ahead and create a job for fixing the patches for
>> format, and also fix the codebase to get the formats.
>>
>> Pre-work if you are interested, read about :
>> https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.html
>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fclang.llvm.org%2Fdocs%2FClangFormatStyleOptions.html&sa=D&ust=1524475718811000&usg=AFQjCNFHjwiLZMlDA3zDhSI4kPiYozHRlg>
>>
>> Also pick a gluster file which would pass through agreed format, so you
>> can validate how it looks after formatting. Instead of waiting for this to
>> happen, we can see is this good enough?
>>
>> Few things we mostly agree:
>>
>>  !AllowShortIfStatementsOnASingleLine !AllowShortLoopsOnASingleLine BraceWrapping(!AfterControlStatement) BraceWrapping(AfterFunction) BraceWrapping(!BeforeElse) ColumnLimit(80) IndentWidth(4) PointerAlignment(PAS_Right) SpaceBeforeParens(SBPO_Always) TabWidth(8) UseTab(UT_Never)
>>
>>
>>   BinPackParameters=true
>>
>>   AlignEscapedNewLinesLeft=false
>>
>>  AlignConsecutiveDeclarations=true
>>
>>   AlignConsecutiveAssignments=true
>>
>>  AlwaysBreakAfterReturnType = true
>>
>>
>>
>> More options which we can discuss:
>>
>> !IndentCaseLabelsSpaceBeforeParens = ControlStatements
>>
>>
>>
>> I propose two steps as preventing history:
>>
>> * The commit before the mass-format-change commit will maintained as a
>> separate branch. (No cost of space, but everyone clearly knows where to go
>> for history, when git blame pointing to the commit of mass changes).
>> * Similarly, to get history of pre-2009 (currently 'historic' repo), I
>> personally feel moving  https://github.com/amarts/glus
>> terfs/commits/git-based-history-from-historic
>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Famarts%2Fglusterfs%2Fcommits%2Fgit-based-history-from-historic&sa=D&ust=1524475718817000&usg=AFQjCNFqMDCu47TjNU2abBOcA22hvqWInw>,
>> as a separate branch in gluster/glusterfs would help. Again, today people
>> has to switch repositories for this.
>> *When*
>> Mon Apr 23, 2018 6pm – 6:50pm India Standard Time
>>
>> *Who*
>> •
>> atumball at redhat.com - organizer
>> •
>> jeff at pl.atyp.us
>> •
>> nbabu at redhat.com
>> •
>> srangana at redhat.com
>> •
>> gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> •
>> jahernan at redhat.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> nigelb
>

-- 
Amar Tumballi (amarts)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20180503/8f48fc94/attachment.html>