[Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 4.1: LTM release targeted for end of May

Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar khiremat at redhat.com
Thu Mar 22 04:37:28 UTC 2018


Hi Shyam,

Rafi and Me are proposing consistent time across replica feature for 4.1

https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/208

Thanks,
Kotresh H R

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 2:05 PM, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 03/20/2018 07:07 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>
>> On 03/12/2018 09:37 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As we wind down on 4.0 activities (waiting on docs to hit the site, and
>>> packages to be available in CentOS repositories before announcing the
>>> release), it is time to start preparing for the 4.1 release.
>>>
>>> 4.1 is where we have GD2 fully functional and shipping with migration
>>> tools to aid Glusterd to GlusterD2 migrations.
>>>
>>> Other than the above, this is a call out for features that are in the
>>> works for 4.1. Please *post* the github issues to the *devel lists* that
>>> you would like as a part of 4.1, and also mention the current state of
>>> development.
>>>
>> Thanks for those who responded. The github lane and milestones for the
>> said features are updated, request those who mentioned issues being
>> tracked for 4.1 check that these are reflected in the project lane [1].
>>
>> I have few requests as follows that if picked up would be a good thing
>> to achieve by 4.1, volunteers welcome!
>>
>> - Issue #224: Improve SOS report plugin maintenance
>>    - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/224
>>
>> - Issue #259: Compilation warnings with gcc 7.x
>>    - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/259
>>
>> - Issue #411: Ensure python3 compatibility across code base
>>    - https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/411
>>
>> - NFS Ganesha HA (storhaug)
>>    - Does this need an issue for Gluster releases to track? (maybe
>> packaging)
>>
>> I will close the call for features by Monday 26th Mar, 2018. Post this,
>> I would request that features that need to make it into 4.1 be raised as
>> exceptions to the devel and maintainers list for evaluation.
>>
>
> Hi Shyam,
>
> I want to add https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/363 also for
> 4.1. It is not a new feature but rather an enhancement to a volume option
> in AFR. I don't think it can qualify as a bug fix, so mentioning it here
> just in case it needs to be tracked too. The (only) patch is undergoing
> review cycles.
>
> Regards,
> Ravi
>
>
>> Further, as we hit end of March, we would make it mandatory for features
>>> to have required spec and doc labels, before the code is merged, so
>>> factor in efforts for the same if not already done.
>>>
>>> Current 4.1 project release lane is empty! I cleaned it up, because I
>>> want to hear from all as to what content to add, than add things marked
>>> with the 4.1 milestone by default.
>>>
>> [1] 4.1 Release lane:
>> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/projects/1#column-1075416
>>
>> Thanks,
>>> Shyam
>>> P.S: Also any volunteers to shadow/participate/run 4.1 as a release
>>> owner?
>>>
>> Calling this out again!
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Kotresh H R
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20180322/f46fca65/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the maintainers mailing list