[Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 4.0: Branched

Atin Mukherjee amukherj at redhat.com
Fri Jan 26 14:02:45 UTC 2018


On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Raghavendra G <raghavendra at gluster.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 4:49 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Shyam Ranganathan" <srangana at redhat.com>
>> > To: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org>, "GlusterFS
>> Maintainers" <maintainers at gluster.org>
>> > Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 9:49:51 PM
>> > Subject: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 4.0: Branched
>> >
>> > On 01/23/2018 03:17 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>> > > 4.0 release has been branched!
>> > >
>> > > I will follow this up with a more detailed schedule for the release,
>> and
>> > > also the granted feature backport exceptions that we are waiting.
>> > >
>> > > Feature backports would need to make it in by this weekend, so that we
>> > > can tag RC0 by the end of the month.
>> >
>> > Backports need to be ready for merge on or before Jan, 29th 2018 3:00 PM
>> > Eastern TZ.
>> >
>> > Features that requested and hence are granted backport exceptions are as
>> > follows,
>> >
>> > 1) Dentry fop serializer xlator on brick stack
>> > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/397
>> >
>> > @Du please backport the same to the 4.0 branch as the patch in master is
>> > merged.
>>
>> Sure.
>>
>
> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19340/1
> But this might fail smoke as the bug associated is not associated with 4.0
> branch. Blocked on 4.0 version tag in bugzilla.
>

I think you can use the same github issue id and don't need a bug here
since it's a feature?


>
>> >
>> > 2) Leases support on GlusterFS
>> > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/350
>> >
>> > @Jiffin and @ndevos, there is one patch pending against master,
>> > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18785/ please do the needful and
>> backport
>> > this to the 4.0 branch.
>> >
>> > 3) Data corruption in write ordering of rebalance and application writes
>> > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/308
>> >
>> > @susant, @du if we can conclude on the strategy here, please backport as
>> > needed.
>>
>> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19207/
>> Review comments need to be addressed and centos regressions are failing.
>>
>> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19202/
>> There are some suggestions on the patch. If others agree they are valid,
>> this patch can be considered as redundant with approach of #19207. However,
>> as I've mentioned in the comments there are some tradeoffs too. So, Waiting
>> for response to my comments. If nobody responds in the time period given,
>> we can merge the patch and susant will have to backport to 4.0 branch.
>>
>> >
>> > 4) Couple of patches that are tracked for a backport are,
>> > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19223/
>> > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19267/ (prep for ctime changes in later
>> > releases)
>> >
>> > Other features discussed are not in scope for a backports to 4.0.
>> >
>> > If you asked for one and do not see it in this list, shout out!
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Only exception could be: https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19223/
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Shyam
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Gluster-devel mailing list
>> > > Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > maintainers mailing list
>> > maintainers at gluster.org
>> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Raghavendra G
>
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20180126/83fba20a/attachment.html>


More information about the maintainers mailing list