[Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.12.3 released

Wed Nov 22 11:05:45 UTC 2017

On Wednesday 22 November 2017 03:16 PM, Sahina Bose wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com 
> <mailto:ndevos at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:38:32AM +0530, Aravinda wrote:
>     > On Tuesday 21 November 2017 08:29 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>     > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:06:59AM +0530, Aravinda wrote:
>     > > > Hi Niels,
>     > > >
>     > > > I over looked the email about 3.12.3 release.
>     > > >
>     > > > Please suggest what we can do for this package dependency.
>     This is runtime
>     > > > dependency for one of the sub feature, if it is delaying
>     other things then
>     > > > we can remove this dependency from spec file.(All features
>     work except
>     > > > signing the webhook data).
>     > > Hmm, normally new features do not get backported to prevent
>     unforseen
>     > > problems...
>     > >
>     > > We have been delayed quite a bit already, users are asking for the
>     > > packages. If dropping the dependency from the .spec does not
>     result in
>     > > errors or tracebacks, that would be one approach. Can you
>     please confirm
>     > > that there are no problems when the package is missing?
>     > Without the dependency, BZ 1501864 will not work. I will start
>     working on
>     > the alternate approach without using that library. We can remove
>     from
>     > dependency list now.
>     >
>     > @Sahina, Is it possible to wait for this feature till 3.12.4
>     release?
>
>     Many thanks Aravinda! I've spoken with Jiffin (one of the 3.12 release
>     managers) about this as well now. I will revert the change in the
>     packaging for the CentOS Storage SIG, both the code and the
>     dependency.
>
>     If a good alternative comes up, and the feature is critical to be in
>     3.12, we can do an update of the RPMs or wait for 3.12.4+.
>
>
> We did have a dependency for the eventing integration feature slated 
> for oVirt 4.2 on BZ 1501864. We already missed the beta for oVirt 4.2, 
> so if an update of RPMs is possible that would be ideal.

If we can include the dependency for 3.12.3, I will make sure to 
implement the alternative before 3.12.4 so that we can drop that 
dependency during 3.12.4 release.

>
>
>     Niels
>
>
>     > > If there is, we'll just bite the bullet and include
>     python-jws-1.5 in
>     > > the CentOS Storage SIG while keeping an eye on the Fedora
>     package for
>     > > updates. Additional maintainers for this and other packages
>     are much
>     > > wanted.
>     > >
>     > > Niels
>     > >
>     > > >
>     > > >
>     > > >
>     > > > On Monday 20 November 2017 09:59 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>     > > > > Hi Aravinda,
>     > > > >
>     > > > > A reply on the questions below is still outstanding. At
>     the moment, I
>     > > > > tend to think that using the most recent python-jwt
>     package from Fedora
>     > > > > is the most reasonable approach. It is a little more
>     maintained there,
>     > > > > and the CentOS Storage SIG can then piggy-back on the
>     coming bugfixes
>     > > > > and updates.
>     > > > >
>     > > > > Is there someone who wants to maintain/assist with
>     watching over
>     > > > > python-jwt for the CentOS Storage SIG?
>     > > > >
>     > > > > Thanks,
>     > > > > Niels
>     > > > >
>     > > > >
>     > > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:22:52PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote:
>     > > > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:39:46AM +0000,
>     jenkins at build.gluster.org <mailto:jenkins at build.gluster.org> wrote:
>     > > > > > > SRC:
>     https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.tar.gz
>     <https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.tar.gz>
>     > > > > > > HASH:
>     https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.sha256sum
>     <https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.sha256sum>
>     > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > This release is made off jenkins-release-21
>     > > > > > This release adds an additional dependency for the
>     glusterfs-events
>     > > > > > sub-package (https://review.gluster.org/18519
>     <https://review.gluster.org/18519>). There is no python-jwt
>     > > > > > in RHEL/CentOS-7 so, we'll need to ship (and maintain!)
>     this new package
>     > > > > > in the CentOS Storage SIG.
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > Will python-jwt become part of RHEL at one point? Which
>     version will be
>     > > > > > included in that case? I would prefer not to have to
>     maintain python-jwt
>     > > > > > longer than necessary, and when RHEL-7 ships this
>     package, it should
>     > > > > > ideally update the version I need to add to the Storage SIG.
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > [Obviously this delays packaging the update for CentOS.]
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > Thanks,
>     > > > > > Niels
>     > > > > > _______________________________________________
>     > > > > > packaging mailing list
>     > > > > > packaging at gluster.org <mailto:packaging at gluster.org>
>     > > > > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>     <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging>
>     > > >
>     > > > --
>     > > > regards
>     > > > Aravinda VK
>     > > >
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > regards
>     > Aravinda VK
>     >
>
>

-- 
regards
Aravinda VK

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20171122/bb5aaf38/attachment.html>