[Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Reviews older than 90 days
Amar Tumballi
atumball at redhat.com
Mon May 22 09:56:38 UTC 2017
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:28:40AM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote:
> > Did get hold of all the pending patches till 2017-05-20 (660 in total).
> > Note that it includes "All open" patches.
> >
> > Attached is the file with all the details. Nigel, considering we have
> dump
> > to have reference, can we go ahead and close everything which is 79 days
> > old?
> >
> > Let me know if anyone wants CSV output of the pending patches, and what
> all
> > the info they need?
> >
> > I recommend all the maintainers to go through the list and make sure they
> > take appropriate action on all old patches. If people are lazy to go
> > through all the patches, i can provide list of files changed per patch
> > (url), so you can choose what matters to you.
>
> It would be helpful to have a list that contains only the old patches. I
> want to search for some keywords in the subject of the patches, and find
> many recent ones.
>
> Could you place such a list on hackmd.io, so that we can make notes
> about changes or something?
>
>
https://hackmd.io/GYIwhsEMYOwLQGYAMBOATHALCmm4oEZgBTOGYgVgA5qxiqqY0g==#
> How can we prevent retiring of changes? Would leaving a comment on the
> change be sufficient?
>
> For now it is good. We need a cut-off date to carry out the automatic
'Abandon' step. I propose June 1st.
-Amar
> Thanks,
> Niels
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20170522/f005b5c5/attachment.html>
More information about the maintainers
mailing list