[Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10: Backports (reminder and action needed)

Shyam srangana at redhat.com
Wed Feb 15 15:22:42 UTC 2017


Hi,

Checking back on status this week.

Everything looks good, the 2 missing backports are also in (thanks Ashish).

We probably will have one last check pre-release.

Thanks,
Shyam

On 02/06/2017 01:12 PM, Shyam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A recheck after one more week, and our status is healthy, backports that
> appear in 3.8 or 3.9 are appearing against 3.10 as well. Thank you.
>
> However the exception raised last week is not handled yet.
>
> Pranith/Xavi/Ashish,
>
> The following commits were merged into master post 3.10 branching and
> also backported to 3.9. Essentially this would mean they need to be
> backported to 3.10 as well, but are missing against that release.
>
> Request one of you to take a look and let us know if these backports are
> needed, and if so backport the same.
>
> 1) https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16439/
> Commit message: cluster/disperse: Do not log fop failed for lockless fops
> Commit in release 3.9: 0f63bda0df91ee7ff42e3262c74220178ef87a21
>
> 2) https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16444/
> Commit message: cluster/ec: Do not start heal on good file while IO is
> going on
> Commit in release 3.9: bc1ce55a7c83c7f5394b26a65bd4a3a669b5962a
>
> Thanks,
> Shyam
>
>
>
> On 01/26/2017 03:09 PM, Shyam wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As we have branched release 3.10 (some time ago), patches that are being
>> backported to 3.8/9 and are *applicable* to 3.10 need to be backported
>> to 3.10 as well.
>>
>> An analysis of this state since branching shows the following commits in
>> 3.9 not backported to 3.10. Ashish, request you to address this at your
>> convenience.
>>
>> bc1ce55a7c83c7f5394b26a65bd4a3a669b5962a (Ashish Pandey) Wed, 11 Jan
>> 2017 17:19:30 +0530 cluster/ec: Do not start heal on good file while IO
>> is going on
>>
>> 0f63bda0df91ee7ff42e3262c74220178ef87a21 (Ashish Pandey) Thu, 19 Jan
>> 2017 18:20:44 +0530 cluster/disperse: Do not log fop failed for lockless
>> fops
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shyam
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers


More information about the maintainers mailing list