[Gluster-Maintainers] port allocation change for 3.8, needs release-notes update

Atin Mukherjee amukherj at redhat.com
Wed Sep 7 17:01:24 UTC 2016

On Wednesday 7 September 2016, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu at redhat.com>

> Just wondering, is it going to be something more than the aggregation of
> BZ descriptions? Do you think it is better to callout just some BZs which
> are user facing compared to the normal aggregation?

IMHO, I don't think users go through all the individual BZs mentioned in
the release note, so having a seperate section in highlighting any major
change w.r.t usability/performance should be explicitly mentioned.

> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ndevos at redhat.com');>> wrote:
>> Hi Avra,
>> http://review.gluster.org/15308 is one of your patches, and this changes
>> the allocation of ports used. It seems to address a real problem, so it
>> is acceptible to include it in 3.8.
>> Because it is a user facing change (different ports), we need to mention
>> the difference in behaviour in the release notes. Could you provide me
>> with a suitable text that includes the problem being addressed, and how
>> the usage of ports differs from before?
>> Thanks,
>> Niels
>> _______________________________________________
>> maintainers mailing list
>> maintainers at gluster.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','maintainers at gluster.org');>
>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> --
> Pranith

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20160907/c6d2b98c/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the maintainers mailing list