[Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

[Raghavendra G]

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Raghavendra G <raghavendra at gluster.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
>> pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
>>>> pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am trying to understand the criticality of these patches.
>>>>> Raghavendra's patch is crucial because gfapi workloads(for samba and qemu)
>>>>> are affected severely. I waited for Krutika's patch because VM usecase can
>>>>> lead to disk corruption on replace-brick. If you could let us know the
>>>>> criticality and we are in agreement that they are this severe, we can
>>>>> definitely take them in. Otherwise next release is better IMO. Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you are asking about how critical they are, then the first two are
>>>> definitely not but third one is actually a critical one as if user upgrades
>>>> from 3.6 to latest with quota enable, further peer probes get rejected and
>>>> the only work around is to disable quota and re-enable it back.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Let me take Raghavendra G's input also here.
>>>
>>> Raghavendra, what do you think we should do? Merge it or live with it
>>> till 3.9.1?
>>>
>>
>> The commit says quota.conf is rewritten to compatible version during
>> three operations:
>> 1. enable/disable quota
>>
>
> This will involve crawling the whole FS doesn't it?
>

Yes. As you suggested, this is not the best work around.


>
> 2. limit usage
>>
>
> This is a good way IMO. Could Sanoj/you confirm that this works once by
> testing it.
>

We can do that by sometime tomorrow afternoon.


>
>> 3. remove quota limit
>>
>
> I guess you added this for completeness. We can't really suggest this to
> users as a work around.
>

Yes. I mentioned it for completeness sake.


>
>
>>
>> I checked the code and it works as stated in commit msg. Probably we can
>> list the above three operations as work around and take this patch in for
>> 3.9.1
>>
>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On a different note, 3.9 head is not static and moving forward. So if
>>>> you are really looking at only critical patches need to go in, that's not
>>>> happening, just a word of caution!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Pranith,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to see following patches getting in:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15722/
>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15714/
>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15792/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
>>>>>> pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>>>       The only problem left was EC taking more time. This should
>>>>>>> affect small files a lot more. Best way to solve it is using compound-fops.
>>>>>>> So for now I think going ahead with the release is best.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are waiting for Raghavendra Talur's
>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15778 before going ahead with the
>>>>>>> release. If we missed any other crucial patch please let us know.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Will make the release as soon as this patch is merged.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Pranith & Aravinda
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> maintainers mailing list
>>>>>>> maintainers at gluster.org
>>>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~ Atin (atinm)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Pranith
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> ~ Atin (atinm)
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Pranith
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Raghavendra G
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Pranith
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
Raghavendra G
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20161110/05c42c09/attachment-0001.html>