[Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

[Raghavendra G]

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
>> pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am trying to understand the criticality of these patches.
>>> Raghavendra's patch is crucial because gfapi workloads(for samba and qemu)
>>> are affected severely. I waited for Krutika's patch because VM usecase can
>>> lead to disk corruption on replace-brick. If you could let us know the
>>> criticality and we are in agreement that they are this severe, we can
>>> definitely take them in. Otherwise next release is better IMO. Thoughts?
>>>
>>
>> If you are asking about how critical they are, then the first two are
>> definitely not but third one is actually a critical one as if user upgrades
>> from 3.6 to latest with quota enable, further peer probes get rejected and
>> the only work around is to disable quota and re-enable it back.
>>
>
> Let me take Raghavendra G's input also here.
>
> Raghavendra, what do you think we should do? Merge it or live with it till
> 3.9.1?
>

The commit says quota.conf is rewritten to compatible version during three
operations:
1. enable/disable quota
2. limit usage
3. remove quota limit

I checked the code and it works as stated in commit msg. Probably we can
list the above three operations as work around and take this patch in for
3.9.1


>
>>
>> On a different note, 3.9 head is not static and moving forward. So if you
>> are really looking at only critical patches need to go in, that's not
>> happening, just a word of caution!
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Pranith,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to see following patches getting in:
>>>>
>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15722/
>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15714/
>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15792/
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
>>>> pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hi,
>>>>>       The only problem left was EC taking more time. This should
>>>>> affect small files a lot more. Best way to solve it is using compound-fops.
>>>>> So for now I think going ahead with the release is best.
>>>>>
>>>>> We are waiting for Raghavendra Talur's http://review.gluster.org/#/c/
>>>>> 15778 before going ahead with the release. If we missed any other
>>>>> crucial patch please let us know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Will make the release as soon as this patch is merged.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Pranith & Aravinda
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> maintainers mailing list
>>>>> maintainers at gluster.org
>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> ~ Atin (atinm)
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Pranith
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> ~ Atin (atinm)
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Pranith
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
Raghavendra G
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20161110/f1d2ae21/attachment-0001.html>