[Gluster-Maintainers] Please pause merging patches to 3.9 waiting for just one patch

[Pranith Kumar Karampuri]

I am trying to understand the criticality of these patches. Raghavendra's
patch is crucial because gfapi workloads(for samba and qemu) are affected
severely. I waited for Krutika's patch because VM usecase can lead to disk
corruption on replace-brick. If you could let us know the criticality and
we are in agreement that they are this severe, we can definitely take them
in. Otherwise next release is better IMO. Thoughts?

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Pranith,
>
> I'd like to see following patches getting in:
>
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15722/
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15714/
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15792/
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
> pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>       The only problem left was EC taking more time. This should affect
>> small files a lot more. Best way to solve it is using compound-fops. So for
>> now I think going ahead with the release is best.
>>
>> We are waiting for Raghavendra Talur's http://review.gluster.org/#/c/
>> 15778 before going ahead with the release. If we missed any other
>> crucial patch please let us know.
>>
>> Will make the release as soon as this patch is merged.
>>
>> --
>> Pranith & Aravinda
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> maintainers mailing list
>> maintainers at gluster.org
>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> ~ Atin (atinm)
>



-- 
Pranith
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20161110/df7f4919/attachment.html>