[Gluster-Maintainers] Please do not merge patches that have topic 'rfc'
Niels de Vos
ndevos at redhat.com
Mon Mar 28 10:36:40 UTC 2016
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:57:03AM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
> Should we have a smoke check that marks a change with `rfc` as the
> topic '-1 (something)'? This would prevent such changes from being
> merged.
We could, but I hope we do not need it. But if others think it would be
the best approach, we can change it.
Niels
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > last week I've seen that some patches got merged that have their Gerrit
> > topic set to 'rfc'. I would really like to have all changes that touch
> > code (maybe not like updates to the MAINTAINERS file) linked to a bug.
> > For features, we used a tracker bug that gathered all patches. Could we
> > pick that up again for NSR/FDL/DHT2 and others that modify the contents
> > under xlators/experimental/ ?
> >
> > Without a bug, it is very difficult to build a Gerrit query that lists
> > all changes for a particular feature. Searching for "topic:rfc" is not
> > very useful :-/
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Niels
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > maintainers mailing list
> > maintainers at gluster.org
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> >
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20160328/8614fe52/attachment.sig>
More information about the maintainers
mailing list