[Gluster-Maintainers] Patches for supporting lseek() with SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE available for review

[Raghavendra Talur]

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> yesterday I have posted the latest version of a series that implements
> support for lseek() with SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE. This functionality can
> improve the handling of sparse files immensely.
>
> Please review the changes that involve components if your interest:
>
>
> http://review.gluster.org/#/q/status:open+project:glusterfs+branch:master+topic:bug-1220173
>
> Once these changes made it in, we can detect holes with glfs_lseek() and
> can improve NFS-Ganesha, QEMU, Samba and glusterfs-coreutils. There are
> probably other projects where we should contribute improvements for
> SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE (like 'cp' from coreutils?).
>
> Ravi already got his Linux kernel FUSE patch merged, kernel-4.5 will
> support lseek() through FUSE as well:
>
>
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/fs/fuse?id=0b5da8db145bfd44266ac964a2636a0cf8d7c286
>
> Eventhough this is a fairly basic (though relatively new) filesystem
> functionality, I want to document it in a feature page in our
> glusterfs-specs repository:
>
>   https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs-specs
>
> Once the document is posted in Gerrit, I'll send a reply to this email
> to get some more reviews.
>
> Thanks,
> Niels
>
>
> Note to other maintainers:
>
> There is some order of merging changes needed. A new FOP has been
> added, and some patches depend on the new GF_FOP_SEEK or other core
> bits.
>
>     Change-Id: I4b74fce8b0bad2f45291fd2c2b9e243c4f4a1aa9
>            core: add seek() FOP
>
>     Change-Id: I0c15153beb27de73d5844b6f692175750fc28f60
>            syncop: add seek() FOP
>
>     Change-Id: I060768a8a4b9b1c80f4a24c0f17d630f7f028690
>            protocol: implement seek() FOP
>
>     Change-Id: I100b741d9bfacb799df318bb081f2497c0664927
>            afr: add seek() FOP
>
>     Change-Id: Iaa23ba81df4ee78ddaab1f96b3d926a563b4bb3d
>            cluster/ec: add seek() FOP
>
>     Change-Id: I5c272855a21501ac31e1a5f4b68ed7245582c17c
>            shard: add seek() FOP as not supported
>
>     Change-Id: I5d15533c53fd710497f97c3cb4a8ea29fba47271
>            posix: implement seek() FOP
>
>     Change-Id: Ic86919d28cf639b561114dc1440c6ea4bc6f7307
>            upcall: add seek() FOP
>
>     Change-Id: I142dde11923244809b03fcca8cd4c2f7d5ff3929
>            gfapi: add support for SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA in
>
>     Change-Id: I8d0573ed8b2ea5ce976ad140a24be7974dbad0e3
>            gfapi: add test for glfs_lseek() SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE
>
>     Change-Id: I58c74e161638b2d4ce12fc91a206fdc1b96de14d
>            fuse: update fuse_kernel.h to version 23
>
>     Change-Id: I12496d788e59461a3023ddd30e0ea3179007f77e
>            fuse: add support for SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA through lseek()
>
>     Change-Id: Ifdee3c793e33f9d763940130e8d01a61eae5498a
>            tests: add seek program for testing SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE over
>
>     Change-Id: I9cfed795737609120eafe86f9287d79057b14fe2
>            stripe: add seek() FOP as not supported
>


Thanks for the order.

Today, shard patch[1] for seek() had got merged before we could look at
this mail.
The revert patch for that is merged now[2]. I request you to send another
patch for the same.


[1] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13290/
[2] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13301/




>
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20160128/417eaf7d/attachment.html>