[Gluster-Maintainers] Requesting separate labels in Gerrit for better testing results

[Kaushal M]

I'd pushed the config to a new branch instead of updating the
`refs/meta/config` branch. I've corrected this now.

The 3 new labels are,
- Smoke
- CentOS-regression
- NetBSD-regression

The new labels are active now. Changes cannot be merged without all of
them being +1. Only the bot accounts (Gluster Build System and NetBSD
Build System) can set them.

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Kaushal M <kshlmster at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 03:46:02PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:51:15AM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
>>> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Atin Mukherjee <atin.mukherjee83 at gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > -Atin
>>> >> > Sent from one plus one
>>> >> > On Jan 12, 2016 7:41 PM, "Niels de Vos" <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 07:21:37PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
>>> >> > > > We have now changed the gerrit-jenkins workflow as follows:
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > 1. Developer works on a new feature/bug fix and tests it locally(run
>>> >> > > > run-tests.sh completely).
>>> >> > > > 2. Developer sends the patch to gerrit using rfc.sh.
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > +++Note that no regression runs have started automatically for this
>>> >> > patch
>>> >> > > > at this point.+++
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > 3. Developer marks the patch as +1 verified on gerrit as a promise of
>>> >> > > > having tested the patch completely. For cases where patches don't have
>>> >> > a +1
>>> >> > > > verified from the developer, maintainer has the following options
>>> >> > > > a. just do the code-review and award a +2 code review.
>>> >> > > > b. pull the patch locally and test completely and award a +1 verified.
>>> >> > > > Both the above actions would result in triggering of regression runs
>>> >> > for
>>> >> > > > the patch.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > Would it not help if anyone giving +1 code-review starts the regression
>>> >> > > tests too? When developers ask me to review, I prefer to see reviews
>>> >> > > done by others first, and any regression failures should have been fixed
>>> >> > > by the time I look at the change.
>>> >> > When this idea was originated (long back) I was in favour of having
>>> >> > regression triggered on a +1, however verified flag set by the developer
>>> >> > would still trigger the regression. Being a maintainer I would always
>>> >> > prefer to look at a patch when its verified  flag is +1 which means the
>>> >> > regression result would also be available.
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Niels requested in IRC that it is good have a mechanism of getting all
>>> >> patches that have already passed all regressions before starting review.
>>> >> Here is what I found
>>> >> a. You can use the search string
>>> >> status:open label:Verified+1,user=build AND label:Verified+1,user=nb7build
>>> >> b. You can bookmark this link and it will take you directly to the page
>>> >> with list of such patches.
>>> >>
>>> >> http://review.gluster.org/#/q/status:open+label:Verified%252B1%252Cuser%253Dbuild+AND+label:Verified%252B1%252Cuser%253Dnb7build
>>> >
>>> > Hmm, copy/pasting this URL does not work for me, I get an error:
>>> >
>>> >     Code Review - Error
>>> >     line 1:26 no viable alternative at character '%'
>>> >     [Continue]
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Kaushal, could you add the following labels to gerrit, so that we can
>>> > update the Jenkins jobs and they can start setting their own labels?
>>> >
>>> > http://review.gluster.org/Documentation/config-labels.html#label_custom
>>> >
>>> > - Smoke: misc smoke testing, compile, bug check, posix, ..
>>> > - NetBSD: NetBSD-7 regression
>>> > - Linux: Linux regression on CentOS-6
>>>
>>> I added these labels to the gluster projects' project.config, but they
>>> don't seem to be showing up. I'll check once more when I get back
>>> home.
>>
>> Might need a restart/reload of Gerrit? It seems required for the main
>> gerrit.config file too:
>>
>>   http://review.gluster.org/Documentation/config-gerrit.html#_file_code_etc_gerrit_config_code
>
> I was using Chromium and did a restart. Both hadn't helped. I'll try again.
>>
>> Niels