[Gluster-Maintainers] 3.7.10 known issue

[Atin Mukherjee]

On 04/04/2016 05:49 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> On 04/04/2016 08:15 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/04/2016 05:11 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:56:45AM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>>>> Hi Kaushal,
>>>>
>>>> We hit a regression yesterday where GlusterD fails to restart when the
>>>> volume has snapshots. Refer to [1] for more details. The work around is
>>>> also a bit tedious where each snapshot brick folders have to be created
>>>> manually and I don't think see any other alternative workaround here.
>>>>
>>>> IMO, we should mention this as known issue in the release note for
>>>> 3.7.10.
>>>
>>> This sounds serious enough to not package 3.7.10 and have users update
>>> to it automatically.
>>>
>>> If others agree, I will not push 3.7.10 as a release for the CentOS
>>> Storage SIG.
>>>
>>> Opinions most welcome, thanks,
>> +1
> 
> How do we prevent such occurrences from happening in the future? If we
> lose this release, we would have called out 2 releases in 2 months as
> bad and that concerns me.
I think what Niels is saying is just for CentOS Storage Sig, not the
overall release, atleast that's what I understood from him.

Unfortunately we didn't get to hit this issue before the tagging was
done. IMO, if our test suit would have had a test where glusterd is
restarted post taking the snapshot this issue should have caught at the
development phase itself :(




> 
> -Vijay
>