From nirsof at gmail.com Sat Aug 17 21:21:11 2019 From: nirsof at gmail.com (Nir Soffer) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 00:21:11 +0300 Subject: [GEDI] [PATCH] block: gluster: Probe alignment limits Message-ID: <20190817212111.13265-1-nsoffer@redhat.com> Implement alignment probing similar to file-posix, by reading from the first 4k of the image. Before this change, provisioning a VM on storage with sector size of 4096 bytes would fail when the installer try to create filesystems. Here is an example command that reproduces this issue: $ qemu-system-x86_64 -accel kvm -m 2048 -smp 2 \ -drive file=gluster://gluster1/gv0/fedora29.raw,format=raw,cache=none \ -cdrom Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-29-1.2.iso The installer fails in few seconds when trying to create filesystem on /dev/mapper/fedora-root. In error report we can see that it failed with EINVAL (I could not extract the error from guest). Copying disk fails with EINVAL: $ qemu-img convert -p -f raw -O raw -t none -T none \ gluster://gluster1/gv0/fedora29.raw \ gluster://gluster1/gv0/fedora29-clone.raw qemu-img: error while writing sector 4190208: Invalid argument This is a fix to same issue fixed in commit a6b257a08e3d (file-posix: Handle undetectable alignment) for gluster:// images. This fix has the same limit, that the first block of the image should be allocated, otherwise we cannot detect the alignment and fallback to a safe value (4096) even when using storage with sector size of 512 bytes. Signed-off-by: Nir Soffer --- block/gluster.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+) diff --git a/block/gluster.c b/block/gluster.c index f64dc5b01e..d936240b72 100644 --- a/block/gluster.c +++ b/block/gluster.c @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ #define GERR_INDEX_HINT "hint: check in 'server' array index '%d'\n" +/* The value is known only on the server side. */ +#define MAX_ALIGN 4096 + typedef struct GlusterAIOCB { int64_t size; int ret; @@ -902,8 +905,52 @@ out: return ret; } +/* + * Check if read is allowed with given memory buffer and length. + * + * This function is used to check O_DIRECT request alignment. + */ +static bool gluster_is_io_aligned(struct glfs_fd *fd, void *buf, size_t len) +{ + ssize_t ret = glfs_pread(fd, buf, len, 0, 0, NULL); + return ret >= 0 || errno != EINVAL; +} + +static void gluster_probe_alignment(BlockDriverState *bs, struct glfs_fd *fd, + Error **errp) +{ + char *buf; + size_t alignments[] = {1, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096}; + size_t align; + int i; + + buf = qemu_memalign(MAX_ALIGN, MAX_ALIGN); + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(alignments); i++) { + align = alignments[i]; + if (gluster_is_io_aligned(fd, buf, align)) { + /* Fallback to safe value. */ + bs->bl.request_alignment = (align != 1) ? align : MAX_ALIGN; + break; + } + } + + qemu_vfree(buf); + + if (!bs->bl.request_alignment) { + error_setg(errp, "Could not find working O_DIRECT alignment"); + error_append_hint(errp, "Try cache.direct=off\n"); + } +} + static void qemu_gluster_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp) { + BDRVGlusterState *s = bs->opaque; + + gluster_probe_alignment(bs, s->fd, errp); + + bs->bl.min_mem_alignment = bs->bl.request_alignment; + bs->bl.opt_mem_alignment = MAX(bs->bl.request_alignment, MAX_ALIGN); bs->bl.max_transfer = GLUSTER_MAX_TRANSFER; } -- 2.20.1 From nsoffer at redhat.com Sat Aug 17 21:31:47 2019 From: nsoffer at redhat.com (Nir Soffer) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 00:31:47 +0300 Subject: [GEDI] [PATCH] block: gluster: Probe alignment limits In-Reply-To: <20190817212111.13265-1-nsoffer@redhat.com> References: <20190817212111.13265-1-nsoffer@redhat.com> Message-ID: On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 12:21 AM Nir Soffer wrote: > Implement alignment probing similar to file-posix, by reading from the > first 4k of the image. > > Before this change, provisioning a VM on storage with sector size of > 4096 bytes would fail when the installer try to create filesystems. Here > is an example command that reproduces this issue: > > $ qemu-system-x86_64 -accel kvm -m 2048 -smp 2 \ > -drive > file=gluster://gluster1/gv0/fedora29.raw,format=raw,cache=none \ > -cdrom Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-29-1.2.iso > > The installer fails in few seconds when trying to create filesystem on > /dev/mapper/fedora-root. In error report we can see that it failed with > EINVAL (I could not extract the error from guest). > > Copying disk fails with EINVAL: > > $ qemu-img convert -p -f raw -O raw -t none -T none \ > gluster://gluster1/gv0/fedora29.raw \ > gluster://gluster1/gv0/fedora29-clone.raw > qemu-img: error while writing sector 4190208: Invalid argument > > This is a fix to same issue fixed in commit a6b257a08e3d (file-posix: > Handle undetectable alignment) for gluster:// images. > > This fix has the same limit, that the first block of the image should be > allocated, otherwise we cannot detect the alignment and fallback to a > safe value (4096) even when using storage with sector size of 512 bytes. > > Signed-off-by: Nir Soffer > --- > block/gluster.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/block/gluster.c b/block/gluster.c > index f64dc5b01e..d936240b72 100644 > --- a/block/gluster.c > +++ b/block/gluster.c > @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ > > #define GERR_INDEX_HINT "hint: check in 'server' array index '%d'\n" > > +/* The value is known only on the server side. */ > +#define MAX_ALIGN 4096 > + > typedef struct GlusterAIOCB { > int64_t size; > int ret; > @@ -902,8 +905,52 @@ out: > return ret; > } > > +/* > + * Check if read is allowed with given memory buffer and length. > + * > + * This function is used to check O_DIRECT request alignment. > + */ > +static bool gluster_is_io_aligned(struct glfs_fd *fd, void *buf, size_t > len) > +{ > + ssize_t ret = glfs_pread(fd, buf, len, 0, 0, NULL); > + return ret >= 0 || errno != EINVAL; > +} > + > +static void gluster_probe_alignment(BlockDriverState *bs, struct glfs_fd > *fd, > + Error **errp) > +{ > + char *buf; > + size_t alignments[] = {1, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096}; > + size_t align; > + int i; > + > + buf = qemu_memalign(MAX_ALIGN, MAX_ALIGN); > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(alignments); i++) { > + align = alignments[i]; > + if (gluster_is_io_aligned(fd, buf, align)) { > + /* Fallback to safe value. */ > + bs->bl.request_alignment = (align != 1) ? align : MAX_ALIGN; > + break; > + } > + } > + > + qemu_vfree(buf); > + > + if (!bs->bl.request_alignment) { > + error_setg(errp, "Could not find working O_DIRECT alignment"); > + error_append_hint(errp, "Try cache.direct=off\n"); > + } > +} > + > static void qemu_gluster_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error > **errp) > { > + BDRVGlusterState *s = bs->opaque; > + > + gluster_probe_alignment(bs, s->fd, errp); > + > + bs->bl.min_mem_alignment = bs->bl.request_alignment; > + bs->bl.opt_mem_alignment = MAX(bs->bl.request_alignment, MAX_ALIGN); > bs->bl.max_transfer = GLUSTER_MAX_TRANSFER; > } > > -- > 2.20.1 > > To debug this I added this temporary patch: diff --git a/block/gluster.c b/block/gluster.c index d2d187490b..790ef4251b 100644 --- a/block/gluster.c +++ b/block/gluster.c @@ -912,6 +912,7 @@ out: static bool gluster_is_io_aligned(struct glfs_fd *fd, void *buf, size_t len) { ssize_t ret = glfs_pread(fd, buf, len, 0, 0, NULL); + printf("gluster_is_io_aligned len=%ld ret=%ld errno=%d\n", len, ret, errno); return ret >= 0 || errno != EINVAL; } @@ -940,6 +941,9 @@ static void gluster_probe_alignment(BlockDriverState *bs, struct glfs_fd *fd, error_setg(errp, "Could not find working O_DIRECT alignment"); error_append_hint(errp, "Try cache.direct=off\n"); } + + printf("Probed aligment for %s request_alignment=%d\n", + bs->filename, bs->bl.request_alignment); } static void qemu_gluster_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp) Here is example run with volume with sector size of 512 bytes: $ sudo mount -t glusterfs gluster1:/gv1 /tmp/gv1 $ dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=100 | tr "\0" "x" > /tmp/gv1/src.raw $ truncate -s 100m /tmp/gv1/dst.raw $ dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=1 of=/tmp/gv1/dst.raw conv=notrunc $ ./qemu-img convert -n -f raw -O raw -t none -T none gluster://gluster1/gv1/src.raw gluster://gluster1/gv1/dst.raw gluster_is_io_aligned len=1 ret=-1 errno=22 gluster_is_io_aligned len=512 ret=512 errno=0 Probed aligment for gluster://gluster1/gv1/src.raw request_alignment=512 gluster_is_io_aligned len=1 ret=-1 errno=22 gluster_is_io_aligned len=512 ret=512 errno=0 Probed aligment for gluster://gluster1/gv1/dst.raw request_alignment=512 And with volume with sector size of 4096 bytes: $ sudo mount -t glusterfs gluster1:/gv0 /tmp/gv0 $ dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=100 | tr "\0" "x" > /tmp/gv0/src.raw $ truncate -s 100m /tmp/gv0/dst.raw $ dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=1 of=/tmp/gv0/dst.raw conv=notrunc $ ./qemu-img convert -n -f raw -O raw -t none -T none gluster://gluster1/gv0/src.raw gluster://gluster1/gv0/dst.raw gluster_is_io_aligned len=1 ret=-1 errno=22 gluster_is_io_aligned len=512 ret=-1 errno=22 gluster_is_io_aligned len=1024 ret=-1 errno=22 gluster_is_io_aligned len=2048 ret=-1 errno=22 gluster_is_io_aligned len=4096 ret=4096 errno=0 Probed aligment for gluster://gluster1/gv0/src.raw request_alignment=4096 gluster_is_io_aligned len=1 ret=-1 errno=22 gluster_is_io_aligned len=512 ret=-1 errno=22 gluster_is_io_aligned len=1024 ret=-1 errno=22 gluster_is_io_aligned len=2048 ret=-1 errno=22 gluster_is_io_aligned len=4096 ret=4096 errno=0 Probed aligment for gluster://gluster1/gv0/dst.raw request_alignment=4096 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mreitz at redhat.com Wed Aug 21 17:04:17 2019 From: mreitz at redhat.com (Max Reitz) Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 19:04:17 +0200 Subject: [GEDI] [PATCH] block: gluster: Probe alignment limits In-Reply-To: <20190817212111.13265-1-nsoffer@redhat.com> References: <20190817212111.13265-1-nsoffer@redhat.com> Message-ID: <9b59c887-ff97-ff0a-fa18-ef9a19c1ad6e@redhat.com> On 17.08.19 23:21, Nir Soffer wrote: > Implement alignment probing similar to file-posix, by reading from the > first 4k of the image. > > Before this change, provisioning a VM on storage with sector size of > 4096 bytes would fail when the installer try to create filesystems. Here > is an example command that reproduces this issue: > > $ qemu-system-x86_64 -accel kvm -m 2048 -smp 2 \ > -drive file=gluster://gluster1/gv0/fedora29.raw,format=raw,cache=none \ > -cdrom Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-29-1.2.iso > > The installer fails in few seconds when trying to create filesystem on > /dev/mapper/fedora-root. In error report we can see that it failed with > EINVAL (I could not extract the error from guest). > > Copying disk fails with EINVAL: > > $ qemu-img convert -p -f raw -O raw -t none -T none \ > gluster://gluster1/gv0/fedora29.raw \ > gluster://gluster1/gv0/fedora29-clone.raw > qemu-img: error while writing sector 4190208: Invalid argument > > This is a fix to same issue fixed in commit a6b257a08e3d (file-posix: > Handle undetectable alignment) for gluster:// images. > > This fix has the same limit, that the first block of the image should be > allocated, otherwise we cannot detect the alignment and fallback to a > safe value (4096) even when using storage with sector size of 512 bytes. > > Signed-off-by: Nir Soffer > --- > block/gluster.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/block/gluster.c b/block/gluster.c > index f64dc5b01e..d936240b72 100644 > --- a/block/gluster.c > +++ b/block/gluster.c > @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ > > #define GERR_INDEX_HINT "hint: check in 'server' array index '%d'\n" > > +/* The value is known only on the server side. */ > +#define MAX_ALIGN 4096 > + > typedef struct GlusterAIOCB { > int64_t size; > int ret; > @@ -902,8 +905,52 @@ out: > return ret; > } > > +/* > + * Check if read is allowed with given memory buffer and length. > + * > + * This function is used to check O_DIRECT request alignment. > + */ > +static bool gluster_is_io_aligned(struct glfs_fd *fd, void *buf, size_t len) > +{ > + ssize_t ret = glfs_pread(fd, buf, len, 0, 0, NULL); > + return ret >= 0 || errno != EINVAL; Is glfs_pread() guaranteed to return EINVAL on invalid alignment? file-posix says this is only the case on Linux (for normal files). Now I also don?t know whether the gluster driver works on anything but Linux anyway. > +} > + > +static void gluster_probe_alignment(BlockDriverState *bs, struct glfs_fd *fd, > + Error **errp) > +{ > + char *buf; > + size_t alignments[] = {1, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096}; > + size_t align; > + int i; > + > + buf = qemu_memalign(MAX_ALIGN, MAX_ALIGN); > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(alignments); i++) { > + align = alignments[i]; > + if (gluster_is_io_aligned(fd, buf, align)) { > + /* Fallback to safe value. */ > + bs->bl.request_alignment = (align != 1) ? align : MAX_ALIGN; > + break; > + } > + } I don?t like the fact that the last element of alignments[] should be the same as MAX_ALIGN, without that ever having been made explicit anywhere. It?s a bit worse in the file-posix patch, because if getpagesize() is greater than 4k, max_align will be greater than 4k. But MAX_BLOCKSIZE is 4k, too, so I suppose we wouldn?t support any block size beyond that anyway, which makes the error message appropriate still. > + > + qemu_vfree(buf); > + > + if (!bs->bl.request_alignment) { > + error_setg(errp, "Could not find working O_DIRECT alignment"); > + error_append_hint(errp, "Try cache.direct=off\n"); > + } > +} > + > static void qemu_gluster_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp) > { > + BDRVGlusterState *s = bs->opaque; > + > + gluster_probe_alignment(bs, s->fd, errp); > + > + bs->bl.min_mem_alignment = bs->bl.request_alignment; Well, I?ll just trust you that there is no weird system where the memory alignment is greater than the request alignment. > + bs->bl.opt_mem_alignment = MAX(bs->bl.request_alignment, MAX_ALIGN); Isn?t request_alignment guaranteed to not exceed MAX_ALIGN, i.e. isn?t this always MAX_ALIGN? > bs->bl.max_transfer = GLUSTER_MAX_TRANSFER; > } file-posix has a check in raw_reopen_prepare() whether we can find a working alignment for the new FD. Shouldn?t we do the same in qemu_gluster_reopen_prepare()? Max -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From ndevos at redhat.com Thu Aug 22 07:03:23 2019 From: ndevos at redhat.com (Niels de Vos) Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 09:03:23 +0200 Subject: [GEDI] [PATCH] block: gluster: Probe alignment limits In-Reply-To: <9b59c887-ff97-ff0a-fa18-ef9a19c1ad6e@redhat.com> References: <20190817212111.13265-1-nsoffer@redhat.com> <9b59c887-ff97-ff0a-fa18-ef9a19c1ad6e@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20190822070323.GE25371@ndevos-x270> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 07:04:17PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote: > On 17.08.19 23:21, Nir Soffer wrote: > > Implement alignment probing similar to file-posix, by reading from the > > first 4k of the image. > > > > Before this change, provisioning a VM on storage with sector size of > > 4096 bytes would fail when the installer try to create filesystems. Here > > is an example command that reproduces this issue: > > > > $ qemu-system-x86_64 -accel kvm -m 2048 -smp 2 \ > > -drive file=gluster://gluster1/gv0/fedora29.raw,format=raw,cache=none \ > > -cdrom Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-29-1.2.iso > > > > The installer fails in few seconds when trying to create filesystem on > > /dev/mapper/fedora-root. In error report we can see that it failed with > > EINVAL (I could not extract the error from guest). > > > > Copying disk fails with EINVAL: > > > > $ qemu-img convert -p -f raw -O raw -t none -T none \ > > gluster://gluster1/gv0/fedora29.raw \ > > gluster://gluster1/gv0/fedora29-clone.raw > > qemu-img: error while writing sector 4190208: Invalid argument > > > > This is a fix to same issue fixed in commit a6b257a08e3d (file-posix: > > Handle undetectable alignment) for gluster:// images. > > > > This fix has the same limit, that the first block of the image should be > > allocated, otherwise we cannot detect the alignment and fallback to a > > safe value (4096) even when using storage with sector size of 512 bytes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nir Soffer > > --- > > block/gluster.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/block/gluster.c b/block/gluster.c > > index f64dc5b01e..d936240b72 100644 > > --- a/block/gluster.c > > +++ b/block/gluster.c > > @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ > > > > #define GERR_INDEX_HINT "hint: check in 'server' array index '%d'\n" > > > > +/* The value is known only on the server side. */ > > +#define MAX_ALIGN 4096 > > + > > typedef struct GlusterAIOCB { > > int64_t size; > > int ret; > > @@ -902,8 +905,52 @@ out: > > return ret; > > } > > > > +/* > > + * Check if read is allowed with given memory buffer and length. > > + * > > + * This function is used to check O_DIRECT request alignment. > > + */ > > +static bool gluster_is_io_aligned(struct glfs_fd *fd, void *buf, size_t len) > > +{ > > + ssize_t ret = glfs_pread(fd, buf, len, 0, 0, NULL); > > + return ret >= 0 || errno != EINVAL; > > Is glfs_pread() guaranteed to return EINVAL on invalid alignment? > file-posix says this is only the case on Linux (for normal files). Now > I also don?t know whether the gluster driver works on anything but Linux > anyway. The behaviour depends on the filesystem used by the Gluster backend. XFS is the recommendation, but in the end it is up to the users. The Gluster server is known to work on Linux, NetBSD and FreeBSD, the vast majority of users runs it on Linux. I do not think there is a strong guarantee EINVAL is always correct. How about only checking 'ret > 0'? > > > +} > > + > > +static void gluster_probe_alignment(BlockDriverState *bs, struct glfs_fd *fd, > > + Error **errp) > > +{ > > + char *buf; > > + size_t alignments[] = {1, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096}; > > + size_t align; > > + int i; > > + > > + buf = qemu_memalign(MAX_ALIGN, MAX_ALIGN); > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(alignments); i++) { > > + align = alignments[i]; > > + if (gluster_is_io_aligned(fd, buf, align)) { > > + /* Fallback to safe value. */ > > + bs->bl.request_alignment = (align != 1) ? align : MAX_ALIGN; > > + break; > > + } > > + } > > I don?t like the fact that the last element of alignments[] should be > the same as MAX_ALIGN, without that ever having been made explicit anywhere. > > It?s a bit worse in the file-posix patch, because if getpagesize() is > greater than 4k, max_align will be greater than 4k. But MAX_BLOCKSIZE > is 4k, too, so I suppose we wouldn?t support any block size beyond that > anyway, which makes the error message appropriate still. > > > + > > + qemu_vfree(buf); > > + > > + if (!bs->bl.request_alignment) { > > + error_setg(errp, "Could not find working O_DIRECT alignment"); > > + error_append_hint(errp, "Try cache.direct=off\n"); > > + } > > +} > > + > > static void qemu_gluster_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp) > > { > > + BDRVGlusterState *s = bs->opaque; > > + > > + gluster_probe_alignment(bs, s->fd, errp); > > + > > + bs->bl.min_mem_alignment = bs->bl.request_alignment; > > Well, I?ll just trust you that there is no weird system where the memory > alignment is greater than the request alignment. > > > + bs->bl.opt_mem_alignment = MAX(bs->bl.request_alignment, MAX_ALIGN); > > Isn?t request_alignment guaranteed to not exceed MAX_ALIGN, i.e. isn?t > this always MAX_ALIGN? > > > bs->bl.max_transfer = GLUSTER_MAX_TRANSFER; > > } > > file-posix has a check in raw_reopen_prepare() whether we can find a > working alignment for the new FD. Shouldn?t we do the same in > qemu_gluster_reopen_prepare()? Yes, I think that makes sense too. Niels From nsoffer at redhat.com Thu Aug 22 19:05:50 2019 From: nsoffer at redhat.com (Nir Soffer) Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 22:05:50 +0300 Subject: [GEDI] [PATCH] block: gluster: Probe alignment limits In-Reply-To: <20190822070323.GE25371@ndevos-x270> References: <20190817212111.13265-1-nsoffer@redhat.com> <9b59c887-ff97-ff0a-fa18-ef9a19c1ad6e@redhat.com> <20190822070323.GE25371@ndevos-x270> Message-ID: On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:03 AM Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 07:04:17PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote: > > On 17.08.19 23:21, Nir Soffer wrote: > > > Implement alignment probing similar to file-posix, by reading from the > > > first 4k of the image. > > > > > > Before this change, provisioning a VM on storage with sector size of > > > 4096 bytes would fail when the installer try to create filesystems. > Here > > > is an example command that reproduces this issue: > > > > > > $ qemu-system-x86_64 -accel kvm -m 2048 -smp 2 \ > > > -drive > file=gluster://gluster1/gv0/fedora29.raw,format=raw,cache=none \ > > > -cdrom Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-29-1.2.iso > > > > > > The installer fails in few seconds when trying to create filesystem on > > > /dev/mapper/fedora-root. In error report we can see that it failed with > > > EINVAL (I could not extract the error from guest). > > > > > > Copying disk fails with EINVAL: > > > > > > $ qemu-img convert -p -f raw -O raw -t none -T none \ > > > gluster://gluster1/gv0/fedora29.raw \ > > > gluster://gluster1/gv0/fedora29-clone.raw > > > qemu-img: error while writing sector 4190208: Invalid argument > > > > > > This is a fix to same issue fixed in commit a6b257a08e3d (file-posix: > > > Handle undetectable alignment) for gluster:// images. > > > > > > This fix has the same limit, that the first block of the image should > be > > > allocated, otherwise we cannot detect the alignment and fallback to a > > > safe value (4096) even when using storage with sector size of 512 > bytes. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nir Soffer > > > --- > > > block/gluster.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/block/gluster.c b/block/gluster.c > > > index f64dc5b01e..d936240b72 100644 > > > --- a/block/gluster.c > > > +++ b/block/gluster.c > > > @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ > > > > > > #define GERR_INDEX_HINT "hint: check in 'server' array index '%d'\n" > > > > > > +/* The value is known only on the server side. */ > > > +#define MAX_ALIGN 4096 > > > + > > > typedef struct GlusterAIOCB { > > > int64_t size; > > > int ret; > > > @@ -902,8 +905,52 @@ out: > > > return ret; > > > } > > > > > > +/* > > > + * Check if read is allowed with given memory buffer and length. > > > + * > > > + * This function is used to check O_DIRECT request alignment. > > > + */ > > > +static bool gluster_is_io_aligned(struct glfs_fd *fd, void *buf, > size_t len) > > > +{ > > > + ssize_t ret = glfs_pread(fd, buf, len, 0, 0, NULL); > > > + return ret >= 0 || errno != EINVAL; > > > > Is glfs_pread() guaranteed to return EINVAL on invalid alignment? > > file-posix says this is only the case on Linux (for normal files). Now > > I also don?t know whether the gluster driver works on anything but Linux > > anyway. > > The behaviour depends on the filesystem used by the Gluster backend. XFS > is the recommendation, but in the end it is up to the users. The Gluster > server is known to work on Linux, NetBSD and FreeBSD, the vast majority > of users runs it on Linux. > > I do not think there is a strong guarantee EINVAL is always correct. How > about only checking 'ret > 0'? > Looks like we don't have a choice. > > > > +} > > > + > > > +static void gluster_probe_alignment(BlockDriverState *bs, struct > glfs_fd *fd, > > > + Error **errp) > > > +{ > > > + char *buf; > > > + size_t alignments[] = {1, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096}; > > > + size_t align; > > > + int i; > > > + > > > + buf = qemu_memalign(MAX_ALIGN, MAX_ALIGN); > > > + > > > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(alignments); i++) { > > > + align = alignments[i]; > > > + if (gluster_is_io_aligned(fd, buf, align)) { > > > + /* Fallback to safe value. */ > > > + bs->bl.request_alignment = (align != 1) ? align : > MAX_ALIGN; > > > + break; > > > + } > > > + } > > > > I don?t like the fact that the last element of alignments[] should be > > the same as MAX_ALIGN, without that ever having been made explicit > anywhere. > > > > It?s a bit worse in the file-posix patch, because if getpagesize() is > > greater than 4k, max_align will be greater than 4k. But MAX_BLOCKSIZE > > is 4k, too, so I suppose we wouldn?t support any block size beyond that > > anyway, which makes the error message appropriate still. > > > > > + > > > + qemu_vfree(buf); > > > + > > > + if (!bs->bl.request_alignment) { > > > + error_setg(errp, "Could not find working O_DIRECT alignment"); > > > + error_append_hint(errp, "Try cache.direct=off\n"); > > > + } > > > +} > > > + > > > static void qemu_gluster_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error > **errp) > > > { > > > + BDRVGlusterState *s = bs->opaque; > > > + > > > + gluster_probe_alignment(bs, s->fd, errp); > > > + > > > + bs->bl.min_mem_alignment = bs->bl.request_alignment; > > > > Well, I?ll just trust you that there is no weird system where the memory > > alignment is greater than the request alignment. > > > > > + bs->bl.opt_mem_alignment = MAX(bs->bl.request_alignment, > MAX_ALIGN); > > > > Isn?t request_alignment guaranteed to not exceed MAX_ALIGN, i.e. isn?t > > this always MAX_ALIGN? > > > > > bs->bl.max_transfer = GLUSTER_MAX_TRANSFER; > > > } > > > > file-posix has a check in raw_reopen_prepare() whether we can find a > > working alignment for the new FD. Shouldn?t we do the same in > > qemu_gluster_reopen_prepare()? > > Yes, I think that makes sense too. > I'l add it in v2. Thanks for reviewing. Nir -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: