[heketi-devel] heketi packaging

[Luis Pabon]

Yeah, maybe. But creating RPMs/DPKG is such a pain :-)

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Jose A. Rivera <jarrpa at redhat.com> wrote:

> Can't people do that already? I would argue that the fact that people
> are looking for RPMs is reason enough to keep them.
>
> --Jose
>
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Luis Pabon <lpabon at chrysalix.org> wrote:
> > What do you guys feel about just not having an RPM anymore, instead
> always
> > use the container to run it? You can even document how to start the
> > container on startup. Here would be an example using docker:
> > https://docs.docker.com/engine/admin/host_integration/
> >
> > - Luis
> >
> > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Jose A. Rivera <jarrpa at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey folks,
> >>
> >> I'm gonna try to spend today working on the long-overdue heketi
> >> packaging for Fedora and CentOS. Part of that will involve writing
> >> down the entire process, so that I can better remember how to do it
> >> and so others can join in as well. :)
> >>
> >> Once I have that documentation down, should we publish it on the wiki?
> >> I ask because I haven't seen other projects publicly publish their
> >> distro-specific packaging guides, so it seems like it'd be weird to do
> >> it ourselves. Would it make sense to maintain some project-internal
> >> documentation, and if so where? It seems unfair to just keep it
> >> internal to Red Hat.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> --Jose
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> heketi-devel mailing list
> >> heketi-devel at gluster.org
> >> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/heketi-devel
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/heketi-devel/attachments/20170526/13b58726/attachment.html>