[Gluster-users] How to configure?

Strahil Nikolov hunter86_bg at yahoo.com
Thu Mar 16 11:37:38 UTC 2023


Can you restart glusterd service (first check that it was not modified to kill the bricks)?
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov 
 
 
  On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 8:26, Diego Zuccato<diego.zuccato at unibo.it> wrote:   OOM is just just a matter of time.

Today mem use is up to 177G/187 and:
# ps aux|grep glfsheal|wc -l
551

(well, one is actually the grep process, so "only" 550 glfsheal processes.

I'll take the last 5:
root    3266352  0.5  0.0 600292 93044 ?        Sl  06:55  0:07 
/usr/libexec/glusterfs/glfsheal cluster_data info-summary --xml
root    3267220  0.7  0.0 600292 91964 ?        Sl  07:00  0:07 
/usr/libexec/glusterfs/glfsheal cluster_data info-summary --xml
root    3268076  1.0  0.0 600160 88216 ?        Sl  07:05  0:08 
/usr/libexec/glusterfs/glfsheal cluster_data info-summary --xml
root    3269492  1.6  0.0 600292 91248 ?        Sl  07:10  0:07 
/usr/libexec/glusterfs/glfsheal cluster_data info-summary --xml
root    3270354  4.4  0.0 600292 93260 ?        Sl  07:15  0:07 
/usr/libexec/glusterfs/glfsheal cluster_data info-summary --xml

-8<--
root at str957-clustor00:~# ps -o ppid= 3266352
3266345
root at str957-clustor00:~# ps -o ppid= 3267220
3267213
root at str957-clustor00:~# ps -o ppid= 3268076
3268069
root at str957-clustor00:~# ps -o ppid= 3269492
3269485
root at str957-clustor00:~# ps -o ppid= 3270354
3270347
root at str957-clustor00:~# ps aux|grep 3266345
root    3266345  0.0  0.0 430536 10764 ?        Sl  06:55  0:00 
gluster volume heal cluster_data info summary --xml
root    3271532  0.0  0.0  6260  2500 pts/1    S+  07:21  0:00 grep 
3266345
root at str957-clustor00:~# ps aux|grep 3267213
root    3267213  0.0  0.0 430536 10644 ?        Sl  07:00  0:00 
gluster volume heal cluster_data info summary --xml
root    3271599  0.0  0.0  6260  2480 pts/1    S+  07:22  0:00 grep 
3267213
root at str957-clustor00:~# ps aux|grep 3268069
root    3268069  0.0  0.0 430536 10704 ?        Sl  07:05  0:00 
gluster volume heal cluster_data info summary --xml
root    3271626  0.0  0.0  6260  2516 pts/1    S+  07:22  0:00 grep 
3268069
root at str957-clustor00:~# ps aux|grep 3269485
root    3269485  0.0  0.0 430536 10756 ?        Sl  07:10  0:00 
gluster volume heal cluster_data info summary --xml
root    3271647  0.0  0.0  6260  2480 pts/1    S+  07:22  0:00 grep 
3269485
root at str957-clustor00:~# ps aux|grep 3270347
root    3270347  0.0  0.0 430536 10672 ?        Sl  07:15  0:00 
gluster volume heal cluster_data info summary --xml
root    3271666  0.0  0.0  6260  2568 pts/1    S+  07:22  0:00 grep 
3270347
-8<--

Seems glfsheal is spawning more processes.
I can't rule out a metadata corruption (or at least a desync), but it 
shouldn't happen...

Diego

Il 15/03/2023 20:11, Strahil Nikolov ha scritto:
> If you don't experience any OOM , you can focus on the heals.
> 
> 284 processes of glfsheal seems odd.
> 
> Can you check the ppid for 2-3 randomly picked ?
> ps -o ppid= <pid>
> 
> Best Regards,
> Strahil Nikolov
> 
>    On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:54, Diego Zuccato
>    <diego.zuccato at unibo.it> wrote:
>    I enabled it yesterday and that greatly reduced memory pressure.
>    Current volume info:
>    -8<--
>    Volume Name: cluster_data
>    Type: Distributed-Replicate
>    Volume ID: a8caaa90-d161-45bb-a68c-278263a8531a
>    Status: Started
>    Snapshot Count: 0
>    Number of Bricks: 45 x (2 + 1) = 135
>    Transport-type: tcp
>    Bricks:
>    Brick1: clustor00:/srv/bricks/00/d
>    Brick2: clustor01:/srv/bricks/00/d
>    Brick3: clustor02:/srv/bricks/00/q (arbiter)
>    [...]
>    Brick133: clustor01:/srv/bricks/29/d
>    Brick134: clustor02:/srv/bricks/29/d
>    Brick135: clustor00:/srv/bricks/14/q (arbiter)
>    Options Reconfigured:
>    performance.quick-read: off
>    cluster.entry-self-heal: on
>    cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm: full
>    cluster.metadata-self-heal: on
>    cluster.shd-max-threads: 2
>    network.inode-lru-limit: 500000
>    performance.md-cache-timeout: 600
>    performance.cache-invalidation: on
>    features.cache-invalidation-timeout: 600
>    features.cache-invalidation: on
>    features.quota-deem-statfs: on
>    performance.readdir-ahead: on
>    cluster.granular-entry-heal: enable
>    features.scrub: Active
>    features.bitrot: on
>    cluster.lookup-optimize: on
>    performance.stat-prefetch: on
>    performance.cache-refresh-timeout: 60
>    performance.parallel-readdir: on
>    performance.write-behind-window-size: 128MB
>    cluster.self-heal-daemon: enable
>    features.inode-quota: on
>    features.quota: on
>    transport.address-family: inet
>    nfs.disable: on
>    performance.client-io-threads: off
>    client.event-threads: 1
>    features.scrub-throttle: normal
>    diagnostics.brick-log-level: ERROR
>    diagnostics.client-log-level: ERROR
>    config.brick-threads: 0
>    cluster.lookup-unhashed: on
>    config.client-threads: 1
>    cluster.use-anonymous-inode: off
>    diagnostics.brick-sys-log-level: CRITICAL
>    features.scrub-freq: monthly
>    cluster.data-self-heal: on
>    cluster.brick-multiplex: on
>    cluster.daemon-log-level: ERROR
>    -8<--
> 
>    htop reports that memory usage is up to 143G, there are 602 tasks and
>    5232 threads (~20 running) on clustor00, 117G/49 tasks/1565 threads on
>    clustor01 and 126G/45 tasks/1574 threads on clustor02.
>    I see quite a lot (284!) of glfsheal processes running on clustor00 (a
>    "gluster v heal cluster_data info summary" is running on clustor02
>    since
>    yesterday, still no output). Shouldn't be just one per brick?
> 
>    Diego
> 
>    Il 15/03/2023 08:30, Strahil Nikolov ha scritto:
>      > Do you use brick multiplexing ?
>      >
>      > Best Regards,
>      > Strahil Nikolov
>      >
>      >    On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 16:44, Diego Zuccato
>      >    <diego.zuccato at unibo.it <mailto:diego.zuccato at unibo.it>> wrote:
>      >    Hello all.
>      >
>      >    Our Gluster 9.6 cluster is showing increasing problems.
>      >    Currently it's composed of 3 servers (2x Intel Xeon 4210 [20
>    cores dual
>      >    thread, total 40 threads], 192GB RAM, 30x HGST HUH721212AL5200
>    [12TB]),
>      >    configured in replica 3 arbiter 1. Using Debian packages from
>    Gluster
>      >    9.x latest repository.
>      >
>      >    Seems 192G RAM are not enough to handle 30 data bricks + 15
>    arbiters
>      >    and
>      >    I often had to reload glusterfsd because glusterfs processed
>    got killed
>      >    for OOM.
>      >    On top of that, performance have been quite bad, especially
>    when we
>      >    reached about 20M files. On top of that, one of the servers
>    have had
>      >    mobo issues that resulted in memory errors that corrupted some
>      >    bricks fs
>      >    (XFS, it required "xfs_reparir -L" to fix).
>      >    Now I'm getting lots of "stale file handle" errors and other
>    errors
>      >    (like directories that seem empty from the client but still
>    containing
>      >    files in some bricks) and auto healing seems unable to complete.
>      >
>      >    Since I can't keep up continuing to manually fix all the
>    issues, I'm
>      >    thinking about backup+destroy+recreate strategy.
>      >
>      >    I think that if I reduce the number of bricks per server to just 5
>      >    (RAID1 of 6x12TB disks) I might resolve RAM issues - at the
>    cost of
>      >    longer heal times in case a disk fails. Am I right or it's
>    useless?
>      >    Other recommendations?
>      >    Servers have space for another 6 disks. Maybe those could be
>    used for
>      >    some SSDs to speed up access?
>      >
>      >    TIA.
>      >
>      >    --
>      >    Diego Zuccato
>      >    DIFA - Dip. di Fisica e Astronomia
>      >    Servizi Informatici
>      >    Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna
>      >    V.le Berti-Pichat 6/2 - 40127 Bologna - Italy
>      >    tel.: +39 051 20 95786
>      >    ________
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >    Community Meeting Calendar:
>      >
>      >    Schedule -
>      >    Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
>      >    Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk
>    <https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk>
>      >    <https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk
>    <https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk>>
>      >    Gluster-users mailing list
>      > Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
>    <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
>      > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>    <https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>
>      >    <https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>    <https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>>
> 
>      >
> 
>    -- 
>    Diego Zuccato
>    DIFA - Dip. di Fisica e Astronomia
>    Servizi Informatici
>    Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna
>    V.le Berti-Pichat 6/2 - 40127 Bologna - Italy
>    tel.: +39 051 20 95786
>    ________
> 
> 
> 
>    Community Meeting Calendar:
> 
>    Schedule -
>    Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
>    Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk
>    <https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk>
>    Gluster-users mailing list
>    Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
>    https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>    <https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>
> 

-- 
Diego Zuccato
DIFA - Dip. di Fisica e Astronomia
Servizi Informatici
Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna
V.le Berti-Pichat 6/2 - 40127 Bologna - Italy
tel.: +39 051 20 95786
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20230316/7fb87d6a/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list