[Gluster-users] Description of performance.cache-size

Strahil Nikolov hunter86_bg at yahoo.com
Wed Sep 30 15:12:06 UTC 2020


Sadly I can't help much here.

Is this a Hyperconverged setup (host is also a client) ?

Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov





В вторник, 29 септември 2020 г., 18:29:20 Гринуич+3, Shreyansh Shah <shreyansh.shah at alpha-grep.com> написа: 





Hi All,
Can anyone help me out with this?

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 2:59 PM Shreyansh Shah <shreyansh.shah at alpha-grep.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> We are using distributed gluster version 5.10 (7 nodes with 2 bricks per node, i.e 14 bricks total).
> 
> We have set the performance.cache-size parameter as 8GB on server. We assumed that this config parameter indicates the amount of RAM that will be used on the client machine (i.e. upto 8 GB of RAM to be used for data caching at clients). But we observed that on a machine the RAM usage of glusterfs process was around 17GB.
> 
> So we want to know whether our understanding of the parameter is correct? Or something else that we have missed.
> 
> Below are the options configured at glusterfs server, please advise if we can add/tune some parameters to extract more performance.
> storage.health-check-interval: 10
> performance.client-io-threads: on
> performance.cache-refresh-timeout: 60
> performance.cache-size: 8GB
> transport.address-family: inet
> nfs.disable: on
> server.keepalive-time: 60
> client.keepalive-time: 60
> network.ping-timeout: 90
> 
> -- 
> Regards,Shreyansh Shah
> 


-- 
Regards,Shreyansh Shah
________



Community Meeting Calendar:

Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968

Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users at gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list