[Gluster-users] Glusterfs as databse store

[Alex K]

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 9:47 AM Diego Zuccato <diego.zuccato at unibo.it>
wrote:

> Il 10/10/20 16:53, Alex K ha scritto:
>
> > Reading from the docs i see that this is not recommended?
> IIUC the risk of having partially-unsynced data is is too high.
> DB replication is not easy to configure because it's hard to do well,
> even active/passive.
> But I can tell you that a 3-node mariadb (galera) cluster is not hard to
> setup. Just follow one of the tutorials. It's nearly as easy as setting
> up a replica3 gluster volume :)
> And "guarantees" consinstency in the DB data.
>
I see. Since I will not have only mariadb, then I have to setup the same
replication for postgresql and later influxdb, which adds into the
complexity.
For cluster management I will be using pacemaker/corosync.

Thanx for your feedback


> --
> Diego Zuccato
> DIFA - Dip. di Fisica e Astronomia
> Servizi Informatici
> Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna
> V.le Berti-Pichat 6/2 - 40127 Bologna - Italy
> tel.: +39 051 20 95786
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20201012/5ab879b5/attachment.html>