[Gluster-users] Failing to nfs mount gluster volume

[vadud3 at gmail.com]

I am running gluster 7.5 on CentOS 7 which does not have gnfs compiled.

I had to build it from source with ./configure --enable-gnfs
--without-libtirpc[1] and then I could nfs mount the gluster volume

[1] https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Developer-guide/Building-GlusterFS/

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:42 PM <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Turned off nfs-server service and now I am getting a different error
> message
>
> [root at node1 ~]# mount -vv -t nfs -o vers=3,mountproto=tcp 192.168.1.121:/gv0
> /nfs_mount/
> mount.nfs: timeout set for Fri May 29 16:43:30 2020
> mount.nfs: trying text-based options
> 'vers=3,mountproto=tcp,addr=192.168.1.121,mountaddr=192.168.1.121'
> mount.nfs: prog 100003, trying vers=3, prot=6
> mount.nfs: portmap query retrying: RPC: Program not registered
> mount.nfs: prog 100003, trying vers=3, prot=17
> mount.nfs: portmap query failed: RPC: Program not registered
> mount.nfs: trying text-based options
> 'vers=3,mountproto=tcp,addr=192.168.1.121,mountaddr=192.168.1.121'
> mount.nfs: prog 100003, trying vers=3, prot=6
> mount.nfs: portmap query retrying: RPC: Program not registered
> mount.nfs: prog 100003, trying vers=3, prot=17
> mount.nfs: portmap query failed: RPC: Program not registered
> mount.nfs: trying text-based options
> 'vers=3,mountproto=tcp,addr=192.168.1.121,mountaddr=192.168.1.121'
> mount.nfs: prog 100003, trying vers=3, prot=6
> mount.nfs: portmap query retrying: RPC: Program not registered
> mount.nfs: prog 100003, trying vers=3, prot=17
> mount.nfs: portmap query failed: RPC: Program not registered
> mount.nfs: requested NFS version or transport protocol is not supported
>
> [root at node1 ~]# gluster volume info gv0
>
> Volume Name: gv0
> Type: Replicate
> Volume ID: f33246a4-2e9a-4958-8aff-4cee815703bc
> Status: Started
> Snapshot Count: 0
> Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2
> Transport-type: tcp
> Bricks:
> Brick1: 192.168.1.121:/data/brick1/gv0
> Brick2: 192.168.1.122:/data/brick2/gv0
> Options Reconfigured:
> nfs.register-with-portmap: on
> performance.client-io-threads: off
> nfs.disable: off
> storage.fips-mode-rchecksum: on
> transport.address-family: inet
> nfs.volume-access: read-write
> nfs.mount-udp: off
>
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 6:48 PM <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> [root at node1 ~]# uname -a
>> Linux node1 3.10.0-1127.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Mar 31 23:36:51 UTC 2020
>> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> [root at node1 ~]# gluster --version
>> glusterfs 7.5
>> ...
>>
>> [root at node1 ~]# gluster volume info
>>
>> Volume Name: gv0
>> Type: Replicate
>> Volume ID: f33246a4-2e9a-4958-8aff-4cee815703bc
>> Status: Started
>> Snapshot Count: 0
>> Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2
>> Transport-type: tcp
>> Bricks:
>> Brick1: 192.168.1.121:/data/brick1/gv0
>> Brick2: 192.168.1.122:/data/brick2/gv0
>> Options Reconfigured:
>> transport.address-family: inet
>> storage.fips-mode-rchecksum: on
>> nfs.disable: off
>> performance.client-io-threads: off
>>
>>
>> [root at node1 ~]# mount -v -t nfs -o vers=3 192.168.1.121:/gv0 /nfs_mount
>> mount.nfs: timeout set for Thu May 28 22:48:39 2020
>> mount.nfs: trying text-based options 'vers=3,addr=192.168.1.121'
>> mount.nfs: prog 100003, trying vers=3, prot=6
>> mount.nfs: trying 192.168.1.121 prog 100003 vers 3 prot TCP port 2049
>> mount.nfs: prog 100005, trying vers=3, prot=17
>> mount.nfs: trying 192.168.1.121 prog 100005 vers 3 prot UDP port 20048
>> mount.nfs: mount(2): No such file or directory
>> mount.nfs: mounting 192.168.1.121:/gv0 failed, reason given by server:
>> No such file or directory
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Asif Iqbal
>> PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
>> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>>
>>
>
> --
> Asif Iqbal
> PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>
>

-- 
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20200529/e0c8bd74/attachment.html>