[Gluster-users] df shows wrong mount size, after adding bricks to volume

Fri May 29 07:09:35 UTC 2020

Surprising! Will you be able to reproduce the issue and share the logs if I
provide a custom build with more logs?

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 1:35 PM Petr Certik <petr at certik.cz> wrote:

> Thanks for your help! Much appreciated.
>
> The fsid is the same for all bricks:
>
> imagegluster1:
>
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/bricks/imagegluster1:-data2-brick:brick-fsid=2065
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/bricks/imagegluster1:-data-brick:brick-fsid=2065
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/bricks/imagegluster2:-data2-brick:brick-fsid=0
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/bricks/imagegluster2:-data-brick:brick-fsid=0
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/bricks/imagegluster3:-data2-brick:brick-fsid=0
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/bricks/imagegluster3:-data-brick:brick-fsid=0
>
> imagegluster2:
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/bricks/imagegluster1:-data2-brick:brick-fsid=0
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/bricks/imagegluster1:-data-brick:brick-fsid=0
>
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/bricks/imagegluster2:-data2-brick:brick-fsid=2065
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/bricks/imagegluster2:-data-brick:brick-fsid=2065
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/bricks/imagegluster3:-data2-brick:brick-fsid=0
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/bricks/imagegluster3:-data-brick:brick-fsid=0
>
> imagegluster3:
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/bricks/imagegluster1:-data2-brick:brick-fsid=0
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/bricks/imagegluster1:-data-brick:brick-fsid=0
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/bricks/imagegluster2:-data2-brick:brick-fsid=0
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/bricks/imagegluster2:-data-brick:brick-fsid=0
>
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/bricks/imagegluster3:-data2-brick:brick-fsid=2065
> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/bricks/imagegluster3:-data-brick:brick-fsid=2065
>
>
> I already did try restarting the glusterd nodes with no effect, but
> that was before the upgrades of client versions.
>
> Running the "volume set" command did not seem to work either, the
> shared-brick-counts are still the same (2).
>
> However, when restarting a node, I do get an error and a few warnings
> in the log: https://pastebin.com/tqq1FCwZ
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 3:14 PM Sanju Rakonde <srakonde at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > The shared-brick-count value indicates the number of bricks sharing a
> file-system. In your case, it should be one, as all the bricks are from
> different mount points. Can you please share the values of brick-fsid?
> >
> > grep "brick-fsid" /var/lib/glusterd/vols/<volname>/bricks/
> >
> > I tried reproducing this issue in fedora vm's but couldn't hit this. we
> are seeing this issue on and off but are unable to reproduce in-house. If
> you see any error messages in glusterd.log please share the log too.
> >
> > Work-around to come out from this situation:
> > 1. Restarting the glusterd service on all nodes:
> > # systemctl restart glusterd
> >
> > 2. Run set volume command to update vol file:
> > # gluster v set <VOLNAME> min-free-disk 11%
> >
> > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:24 PM Petr Certik <petr at certik.cz> wrote:
> >>
> >> As far as I remember, there was no version update on the server. It
> >> was definitely installed as version 7.
> >>
> >> Shared bricks:
> >>
> >> Server 1:
> >>
> >> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0.imagegluster1.data2-brick.vol:
> >> option shared-brick-count 2
> >> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0.imagegluster1.data-brick.vol:    option
> >> shared-brick-count 2
> >> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0.imagegluster2.data2-brick.vol:
> >> option shared-brick-count 0
> >> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0.imagegluster2.data-brick.vol:    option
> >> shared-brick-count 0
> >> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0.imagegluster3.data2-brick.vol:
> >> option shared-brick-count 0
> >> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0.imagegluster3.data-brick.vol:    option
> >> shared-brick-count 0
> >>
> >> Server 2:
> >>
> >> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0.imagegluster1.data2-brick.vol:
> >> option shared-brick-count 0
> >> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0.imagegluster1.data-brick.vol:    option
> >> shared-brick-count 0
> >> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0.imagegluster2.data2-brick.vol:
> >> option shared-brick-count 2
> >> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0.imagegluster2.data-brick.vol:    option
> >> shared-brick-count 2
> >> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0.imagegluster3.data2-brick.vol:
> >> option shared-brick-count 0
> >> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0.imagegluster3.data-brick.vol:    option
> >> shared-brick-count 0
> >>
> >> Server 3:
> >>
> >> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0.imagegluster1.data2-brick.vol:
> >> option shared-brick-count 0
> >> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0.imagegluster1.data-brick.vol:    option
> >> shared-brick-count 0
> >> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0.imagegluster2.data2-brick.vol:
> >> option shared-brick-count 0
> >> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0.imagegluster2.data-brick.vol:    option
> >> shared-brick-count 0
> >> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0.imagegluster3.data2-brick.vol:
> >> option shared-brick-count 2
> >> /var/lib/glusterd/vols/gv0/gv0.imagegluster3.data-brick.vol:    option
> >> shared-brick-count 2
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:36 PM Sanju Rakonde <srakonde at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi Petr,
> >> >
> >> > what was the server version before upgrading to 7.2?
> >> >
> >> > Can you please share the shared-brick-count values from brick
> volfiles from all the nodes?
> >> > grep shared-brick-count /var/lib/glusterd/vols/<volume_name>/*
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 2:31 PM Petr Certik <petr at certik.cz> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi everyone,
> >> >>
> >> >> we've been running a replicated volume for a while, with three ~1 TB
> >> >> bricks. Recently we've added three more same-sized bricks, making it
> a
> >> >> 2 x 3 distributed replicated volume. However, even after rebalance,
> >> >> the `df` command on a client shows the correct used/size percentage,
> >> >> but wrong absolute sizes. The size still shows up as ~1 TB while in
> >> >> reality it should be around 2 TB, and both "used" and "available"
> >> >> reported sizes are about half of what they should be. The clients
> were
> >> >> an old version (5.5), but even after upgrade to 7.2 and remount, the
> >> >> reported sizes are still wrong. There are no heal entries. What can I
> >> >> do to fix this?
> >> >>
> >> >> OS: debian buster everywhere
> >> >> Server version: 7.3-1, opversion: 70200
> >> >> Client versions: 5.5-3, 7.6-1, opversions: 50400, 70200
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> root at imagegluster1:~# gluster volume info gv0
> >> >> Volume Name: gv0
> >> >> Type: Distributed-Replicate
> >> >> Volume ID: 5505d350-9b61-4056-9054-de9dfb58eab7
> >> >> Status: Started
> >> >> Snapshot Count: 0
> >> >> Number of Bricks: 2 x 3 = 6
> >> >> Transport-type: tcp
> >> >> Bricks:
> >> >> Brick1: imagegluster1:/data/brick
> >> >> Brick2: imagegluster2:/data/brick
> >> >> Brick3: imagegluster3:/data/brick
> >> >> Brick4: imagegluster1:/data2/brick
> >> >> Brick5: imagegluster2:/data2/brick
> >> >> Brick6: imagegluster3:/data2/brick
> >> >> Options Reconfigured:
> >> >> features.cache-invalidation: on
> >> >> transport.address-family: inet
> >> >> storage.fips-mode-rchecksum: on
> >> >> nfs.disable: on
> >> >> performance.client-io-threads: off
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> root at imagegluster1:~# df -h
> >> >> Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> >> >> ...
> >> >> /dev/sdb1       894G  470G  425G  53% /data2
> >> >> /dev/sdc1       894G  469G  426G  53% /data
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> root at any-of-the-clients:~# df -h
> >> >> Filesystem         Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> >> >> ...
> >> >> imagegluster:/gv0  894G  478G  416G  54% /mnt/gluster
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Let me know if there's any other info I can provide about our setup.
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >> Petr Certik
> >> >> ________
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Community Meeting Calendar:
> >> >>
> >> >> Schedule -
> >> >> Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
> >> >> Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968
> >> >>
> >> >> Gluster-users mailing list
> >> >> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> >> >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Sanju
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Sanju
>
>

-- 
Thanks,
Sanju
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20200529/402f4f18/attachment.html>