[Gluster-users] MTU 9000 question
Dmitry Melekhov
dm at belkam.com
Wed May 6 14:56:37 UTC 2020
06.05.2020 18:09, Erik Jacobson пишет:
> "It is inconvenient for us to use MTU 9K for our gluster servers for
> various reasons. We typically have bonded 10G interfaces.
>
> We use distribute/replicate and gluster NFS for compute nodes.
>
> My understanding is the negative to using 1500 MTU is just less
> efficient use of the network. Are there other concerns? We don't
> currently have network saturation problems.
>
> We are trying to make a decision on if we need to do a bunch of extra
> work to switch to 9K MTU and if it is worth the benefit.
>
> Does the community have any suggestions?
>
We run 3 nodes setup on 9000 mtu, and, really, I don't think we have any
benefit on our workload.
On the other side allow jumbo frames and change mtu on even hundreds on
nodes is extremely simple,
you can just test it. I don't see "bunch of extra work" here, just use
ssh and some scripting or something like ansible...
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list