[Gluster-users] State of Gluster project
Erik Jacobson
erik.jacobson at hpe.com
Mon Jun 22 15:48:43 UTC 2020
> For NVMe/SSD - raid controller is pointless , so JBOD makes most sense.
I am game for an education lesson here. We're still using spinng drives
with big RAID caches but we keep discussing SSD in the context of RAID. I
have read for many real-world workloads, RAID0 makes no sense with
modern SSDs. I get that part. But if your concern is reliability and
reducing the need to mess with Gluster to recover from a drive failure,
a RAID1 or or RADI10 (or some other with redundancy) would seem to at
least make sense from that perspective.
Was your answer a performance answer? Or am I missing something about
RAIDs for redundancy and SSDs being a bad choice?
Thanks again as always,
Erik
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list