[Gluster-users] Extremely slow file listing in folders with many files

Felix Kölzow felix.koelzow at gmx.de
Thu Apr 30 16:05:19 UTC 2020


Dear Artem,

sry for the noise, since you already provide the xfs_info.

Could you provide the output of


getfattr -d -m. -e hex /DirectoryPathOfInterest_onTheBrick/


Felix

On 30/04/2020 18:01, Felix Kölzow wrote:
>
> Dear Artem,
>
> can you also provide some information w.r.t your xfs filesystem, i.e.
> xfs_info of your block device?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Felix
>
> On 30/04/2020 17:27, Artem Russakovskii wrote:
>> Hi Strahil, in the original email I included both the times for the
>> first and subsequent reads on the fuse mounted gluster volume as well
>> as the xfs filesystem the gluster data resides on (this is the brick,
>> right?).
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020, 7:44 AM Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com
>> <mailto:hunter86_bg at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On April 30, 2020 4:24:23 AM GMT+03:00, Artem Russakovskii
>>     <archon810 at gmail.com <mailto:archon810 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>     >Hi all,
>>     >
>>     >We have 500GB and 10TB 4x1 replicate xfs-based gluster volumes,
>>     and the
>>     >10TB one especially is extremely slow to do certain things with (and
>>     >has
>>     >been since gluster 3.x when we started). We're currently on 5.13.
>>     >
>>     >The number of files isn't even what I'd consider that great - under
>>     >100k
>>     >per dir.
>>     >
>>     >Here are some numbers to look at:
>>     >
>>     >On gluster volume in a dir of 45k files:
>>     >The first time
>>     >
>>     >time find | wc -l
>>     >45423
>>     >real    8m44.819s
>>     >user    0m0.459s
>>     >sys     0m0.998s
>>     >
>>     >And again
>>     >
>>     >time find | wc -l
>>     >45423
>>     >real    0m34.677s
>>     >user    0m0.291s
>>     >sys     0m0.754s
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >If I run the same operation on the xfs block device itself:
>>     >The first time
>>     >
>>     >time find | wc -l
>>     >45423
>>     >real    0m13.514s
>>     >user    0m0.144s
>>     >sys     0m0.501s
>>     >
>>     >And again
>>     >
>>     >time find | wc -l
>>     >45423
>>     >real    0m0.197s
>>     >user    0m0.088s
>>     >sys     0m0.106s
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >I'd expect a performance difference here but just as it was several
>>     >years
>>     >ago when we started with gluster, it's still huge, and simple file
>>     >listings
>>     >are incredibly slow.
>>     >
>>     >At the time, the team was looking to do some optimizations, but
>>     I'm not
>>     >sure this has happened.
>>     >
>>     >What can we do to try to improve performance?
>>     >
>>     >Thank you.
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >Some setup values follow.
>>     >
>>     >xfs_info /mnt/SNIP_block1
>>     >meta-data=/dev/sdc               isize=512 agcount=103,
>>     >agsize=26214400
>>     >blks
>>     >         =                       sectsz=512  attr=2, projid32bit=1
>>     >      =                       crc=1        finobt=1, sparse=0,
>>     rmapbt=0
>>     >         =                       reflink=0
>>     >data     =                       bsize=4096  blocks=2684354560,
>>     >imaxpct=25
>>     >         =                       sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
>>     >naming   =version 2              bsize=4096  ascii-ci=0, ftype=1
>>     >log      =internal log           bsize=4096  blocks=51200, version=2
>>     >        =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks,
>>     lazy-count=1
>>     >realtime =none                   extsz=4096  blocks=0, rtextents=0
>>     >
>>     >Volume Name: SNIP_data1
>>     >Type: Replicate
>>     >Volume ID: SNIP
>>     >Status: Started
>>     >Snapshot Count: 0
>>     >Number of Bricks: 1 x 4 = 4
>>     >Transport-type: tcp
>>     >Bricks:
>>     >Brick1: nexus2:/mnt/SNIP_block1/SNIP_data1
>>     >Brick2: forge:/mnt/SNIP_block1/SNIP_data1
>>     >Brick3: hive:/mnt/SNIP_block1/SNIP_data1
>>     >Brick4: citadel:/mnt/SNIP_block1/SNIP_data1
>>     >Options Reconfigured:
>>     >cluster.quorum-count: 1
>>     >cluster.quorum-type: fixed
>>     >network.ping-timeout: 5
>>     >network.remote-dio: enable
>>     >performance.rda-cache-limit: 256MB
>>     >performance.readdir-ahead: on
>>     >performance.parallel-readdir: on
>>     >network.inode-lru-limit: 500000
>>     >performance.md-cache-timeout: 600
>>     >performance.cache-invalidation: on
>>     >performance.stat-prefetch: on
>>     >features.cache-invalidation-timeout: 600
>>     >features.cache-invalidation: on
>>     >cluster.readdir-optimize: on
>>     >performance.io-thread-count: 32
>>     >server.event-threads: 4
>>     >client.event-threads: 4
>>     >performance.read-ahead: off
>>     >cluster.lookup-optimize: on
>>     >performance.cache-size: 1GB
>>     >cluster.self-heal-daemon: enable
>>     >transport.address-family: inet
>>     >nfs.disable: on
>>     >performance.client-io-threads: on
>>     >cluster.granular-entry-heal: enable
>>     >cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm: full
>>     >
>>     >Sincerely,
>>     >Artem
>>     >
>>     >--
>>     >Founder, Android Police <http://www.androidpolice.com>, APK Mirror
>>     ><http://www.apkmirror.com/>, Illogical Robot LLC
>>     >beerpla.net <http://beerpla.net> | @ArtemR
>>     <http://twitter.com/ArtemR>
>>
>>     Hi Artem,
>>
>>     Have you checked the same on brick level ? How big is the
>>     difference ?
>>
>>     Best Regards,
>>     Strahil Nikolov
>>
>>
>> ________
>>
>>
>>
>> Community Meeting Calendar:
>>
>> Schedule -
>> Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
>> Bridge:https://bluejeans.com/441850968
>>
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
> ________
>
>
>
> Community Meeting Calendar:
>
> Schedule -
> Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
> Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968
>
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20200430/27b85e7b/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list