[Gluster-users] add-brick: failed: Commit failed
David Cunningham
dcunningham at voisonics.com
Sun May 19 23:31:16 UTC 2019
Hello,
It does show everything as Connected and 0 for the existing bricks, gfs1
and gfs2. The new brick gfs3 isn't listed, presumably because of the
failure as per my original email. Would anyone have any further suggestions
on how to prevent the "Transport endpoint is not connected" error when
adding the new brick?
# gluster volume heal gvol0 info summary
Brick gfs1:/nodirectwritedata/gluster/gvol0
Status: Connected
Total Number of entries: 0
Number of entries in heal pending: 0
Number of entries in split-brain: 0
Number of entries possibly healing: 0
Brick gfs2:/nodirectwritedata/gluster/gvol0
Status: Connected
Total Number of entries: 0
Number of entries in heal pending: 0
Number of entries in split-brain: 0
Number of entries possibly healing: 0
# gluster volume status all
Status of volume: gvol0
Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick gfs1:/nodirectwritedata/gluster/gvol0 49152 0 Y
7706
Brick gfs2:/nodirectwritedata/gluster/gvol0 49152 0 Y
7624
Self-heal Daemon on localhost N/A N/A Y
47636
Self-heal Daemon on gfs3 N/A N/A Y
18542
Self-heal Daemon on gfs2 N/A N/A Y
37192
Task Status of Volume gvol0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are no active volume task
On Sat, 18 May 2019 at 22:34, Strahil <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Just run 'gluster volume heal my_volume info summary'.
>
> It will report any issues - everything should be 'Connected' and show '0'.
>
> Best Regards,
> Strahil Nikolov
> On May 18, 2019 02:01, David Cunningham <dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ravi,
>
> The existing two nodes aren't in split-brain, at least that I'm aware of.
> Running "gluster volume status all" doesn't show any problem.
>
> I'm not sure what "in metadata" means. Can you please explain that one?
>
>
> On Fri, 17 May 2019 at 22:43, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> On 17/05/19 5:59 AM, David Cunningham wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We're adding an arbiter node to an existing volume and having an issue.
> Can anyone help? The root cause error appears to be
> "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001: failed to resolve (Transport
> endpoint is not connected)", as below.
>
> Was your root directory of the replica 2 volume in metadata or entry
> split-brain? If yes, you need to resolve it before proceeding with the
> add-brick.
>
> -Ravi
>
>
> We are running glusterfs 5.6.1. Thanks in advance for any assistance!
>
> On existing node gfs1, trying to add new arbiter node gfs3:
>
> # gluster volume add-brick gvol0 replica 3 arbiter 1
> gfs3:/nodirectwritedata/gluster/gvol0
> volume add-brick: failed: Commit failed on gfs3. Please check log file for
> details.
>
> On new node gfs3 in gvol0-add-brick-mount.log:
>
> [2019-05-17 01:20:22.689721] I [fuse-bridge.c:4267:fuse_init]
> 0-glusterfs-fuse: FUSE inited with protocol versions: glusterfs 7.24 kernel
> 7.22
> [2019-05-17 01:20:22.689778] I [fuse-bridge.c:4878:fuse_graph_sync]
> 0-fuse: switched to graph 0
> [2019-05-17 01:20:22.694897] E [fuse-bridge.c:4336:fuse_first_lookup]
> 0-fuse: first lookup on root failed (Transport endpoint is not connected)
> [2019-05-17 01:20:22.699770] W [fuse-resolve.c:127:fuse_resolve_gfid_cbk]
> 0-fuse: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001: failed to resolve (Transport
> endpoint is not connected)
> [2019-05-17 01:20:22.699834] W [fuse-bridge.c:3294:fuse_setxattr_resume]
> 0-glusterfs-fuse: 2: SETXATTR 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001/1
> (trusted.add-brick) resolution failed
> [2019-05-17 01:20:22.715656] I [fuse-bridge.c:5144:fuse_thread_proc]
> 0-fuse: initating unmount of /tmp/mntQAtu3f
> [2019-05-17 01:20:22.715865] W [glusterfsd.c:1500:cleanup_and_exit]
> (-->/lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0x7dd5)
>
>
--
David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited
http://voisonics.com/
USA: +1 213 221 1092
New Zealand: +64 (0)28 2558 3782
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20190520/f0755d64/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list