[Gluster-users] Brick missing trusted.glusterfs.dht xattr
Matthew Benstead
matthewb at uvic.ca
Fri Jul 26 21:01:51 UTC 2019
Ok thank-you for explaining everything - that makes sense.
Currently the brick file systems are pretty evenly distributed so I
probably won't run the fix-layout right now.
Would this state have any impact on geo-replication? I'm trying to
geo-replicate this volume, but am getting a weird error: "Changelog
register failed error=[Errno 21] Is a directory"
I assume this is related to something else, but I wasn't sure.
Thanks,
-Matthew
--
Matthew Benstead
System Administrator
Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium <https://pacificclimate.org/>
University of Victoria, UH1
PO Box 1800, STN CSC
Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2
Phone: +1-250-721-8432
Email: matthewb at uvic.ca
On 7/26/19 12:02 AM, Nithya Balachandran wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 01:56, Matthew Benstead <matthewb at uvic.ca
> <mailto:matthewb at uvic.ca>> wrote:
>
> Hi Nithya,
>
> Hmm... I don't remember if I did, but based on what I'm seeing it
> sounds like I probably didn't run rebalance or fix-layout.
>
> It looks like folders that haven't had any new files created have
> a dht of 0, while other folders have non-zero values.
>
> [root at gluster07 ~]# getfattr --absolute-names -m . -d -e hex
> /mnt/raid6-storage/storage/ | grep dht
> [root at gluster07 ~]# getfattr --absolute-names -m . -d -e hex
> /mnt/raid6-storage/storage/home | grep dht
> trusted.glusterfs.dht=0x00000000000000000000000000000000
> [root at gluster07 ~]# getfattr --absolute-names -m . -d -e hex
> /mnt/raid6-storage/storage/home/matthewb | grep dht
> trusted.glusterfs.dht=0x00000001000000004924921a6db6dbc7
>
> If I just run the fix-layout command will it re-create all of the
> dht values or just the missing ones?
>
>
> A fix-layout will recalculate the layouts entirely so files all the
> values will change. No files will be moved.
> A rebalance will recalculate the layouts like the fix-layout but will
> also move files to their new locations based on the new layout ranges.
> This could take a lot of time depending on the number of
> files/directories on the volume. If you do this, I would recommend
> that you turn off lookup-optimize until the rebalance is over.
>
>
> Since the brick is already fairly size balanced could I get away
> with running fix-layout but not rebalance? Or would the new dht
> layout mean slower accesses since the files may be expected on
> different bricks?
>
>
> The first access for a file will be slower. The next one will be
> faster as the location will be cached in the client's in-memory
> structures.
> You may not need to run either a fix-layout or a rebalance if new file
> creations will be in directories created after the add-brick. Gluster
> will automatically include all 7 bricks for those directories.
>
> Regards,
> Nithya
>
>
> Thanks,
> -Matthew
>
> --
> Matthew Benstead
> System Administrator
> Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium <https://pacificclimate.org/>
> University of Victoria, UH1
> PO Box 1800, STN CSC
> Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2
> Phone: +1-250-721-8432
> Email: matthewb at uvic.ca <mailto:matthewb at uvic.ca>
>
> On 7/24/19 9:30 PM, Nithya Balachandran wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 22:12, Matthew Benstead <matthewb at uvic.ca
>> <mailto:matthewb at uvic.ca>> wrote:
>>
>> So looking more closely at the trusted.glusterfs.dht
>> attributes from the bricks it looks like they cover the
>> entire range... and there is no range left for gluster07.
>>
>> The first 6 bricks range from 0x00000000 to 0xffffffff -
>> so... is there a way to re-calculate what the dht values
>> should be? Each of the bricks should have a gap
>>
>> Gluster05 00000000 -> 2aaaaaa9
>> Gluster06 2aaaaaaa -> 55555553
>> Gluster01 55555554 -> 7ffffffd
>> Gluster02 7ffffffe -> aaaaaaa7
>> Gluster03 aaaaaaa8 -> d5555551
>> Gluster04 d5555552 -> ffffffff
>> Gluster07 None
>>
>> If we split the range into 7 servers that would be a gap of
>> about 0x24924924 for each server.
>>
>> Now in terms of the gluster07 brick, about 2 years ago the
>> RAID array the brick was stored on became corrupted. I ran
>> the remove-brick force command, then provisioned a new
>> server, ran the add-brick command and then restored the
>> missing files from backup by copying them back to the main
>> gluster mount (not the brick).
>>
>>
>> Did you run a rebalance after performing the add-brick? Without a
>> rebalance/fix-layout , the layout for existing directories on the
>> volume will not be updated to use the new brick as well.
>>
>> That the layout does not include the new brick in the root dir is
>> in itself is not a problem. Do you create a lot of files directly
>> in the root of the volume? If yes, you might want to run a
>> rebalance. Otherwise, if you mostly create files in newly added
>> directories, you can probably ignore this. You can check the
>> layout for directories on the volume and see if they incorporate
>> the brick7.
>>
>> I would expect a lookup on the root to have set an xattr on the
>> brick with an empty layout range . The fact that the xattr does
>> not exist at all on the brick is what I am looking into.
>>
>>
>> It looks like prior to that event this was the layout - which
>> would make sense given the equal size of the 7 bricks:
>>
>> gluster02.pcic.uvic.ca <http://gluster02.pcic.uvic.ca> |
>> SUCCESS | rc=0 >>
>> # file: /mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>> trusted.glusterfs.dht=0x000000010000000048bfff206d1ffe5f
>>
>> gluster05.pcic.uvic.ca <http://gluster05.pcic.uvic.ca> |
>> SUCCESS | rc=0 >>
>> # file: /mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>> trusted.glusterfs.dht=0x0000000100000000b5dffce0da3ffc1f
>>
>> gluster04.pcic.uvic.ca <http://gluster04.pcic.uvic.ca> |
>> SUCCESS | rc=0 >>
>> # file: /mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>> trusted.glusterfs.dht=0x0000000100000000917ffda0b5dffcdf
>>
>> gluster03.pcic.uvic.ca <http://gluster03.pcic.uvic.ca> |
>> SUCCESS | rc=0 >>
>> # file: /mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>> trusted.glusterfs.dht=0x00000001000000006d1ffe60917ffd9f
>>
>> gluster01.pcic.uvic.ca <http://gluster01.pcic.uvic.ca> |
>> SUCCESS | rc=0 >>
>> # file: /mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>> trusted.glusterfs.dht=0x0000000100000000245fffe048bfff1f
>>
>> gluster07.pcic.uvic.ca <http://gluster07.pcic.uvic.ca> |
>> SUCCESS | rc=0 >>
>> # file: /mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>> trusted.glusterfs.dht=0x000000010000000000000000245fffdf
>>
>> gluster06.pcic.uvic.ca <http://gluster06.pcic.uvic.ca> |
>> SUCCESS | rc=0 >>
>> # file: /mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>> trusted.glusterfs.dht=0x0000000100000000da3ffc20ffffffff
>>
>> Which yields the following:
>>
>> 00000000 -> 245fffdf Gluster07
>> 245fffe0 -> 48bfff1f Gluster01
>> 48bfff20 -> 6d1ffe5f Gluster02
>> 6d1ffe60 -> 917ffd9f Gluster03
>> 917ffda0 -> b5dffcdf Gluster04
>> b5dffce0 -> da3ffc1f Gluster05
>> da3ffc20 -> ffffffff Gluster06
>>
>> Is there some way to get back to this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Matthew
>>
>> --
>> Matthew Benstead
>> System Administrator
>> Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium <https://pacificclimate.org/>
>> University of Victoria, UH1
>> PO Box 1800, STN CSC
>> Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2
>> Phone: +1-250-721-8432
>> Email: matthewb at uvic.ca <mailto:matthewb at uvic.ca>
>>
>> On 7/18/19 7:20 AM, Matthew Benstead wrote:
>>> Hi Nithya,
>>>
>>> No - it was added about a year and a half ago. I have tried
>>> re-mounting the volume on the server, but it didn't add the
>>> attr:
>>>
>>> [root at gluster07 ~]# umount /storage/
>>> [root at gluster07 ~]# cat /etc/fstab | grep "/storage"
>>> 10.0.231.56:/storage /storage glusterfs
>>> defaults,log-level=WARNING,backupvolfile-server=10.0.231.51 0 0
>>> [root at gluster07 ~]# mount /storage/
>>> [root at gluster07 ~]# df -h /storage/
>>> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
>>> 10.0.231.56:/storage 255T 194T 62T 77% /storage
>>> [root at gluster07 ~]# getfattr --absolute-names -m . -d -e hex
>>> /mnt/raid6-storage/storage/
>>> # file: /mnt/raid6-storage/storage/
>>> security.selinux=0x756e636f6e66696e65645f753a6f626a6563745f723a756e6c6162656c65645f743a733000
>>> trusted.gfid=0x00000000000000000000000000000001
>>> trusted.glusterfs.6f95525a-94d7-4174-bac4-e1a18fe010a2.xtime=0x5d307baa00023ec0
>>> trusted.glusterfs.quota.dirty=0x3000
>>> trusted.glusterfs.quota.size.2=0x00001b71d5279e000000000000763e32000000000005cd53
>>> trusted.glusterfs.volume-id=0x6f95525a94d74174bac4e1a18fe010a2
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Matthew
>>>
>>> On 7/17/19 10:04 PM, Nithya Balachandran wrote:
>>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>>
>>>> Was this node/brick added to the volume recently? If yes,
>>>> try mounting the volume on a fresh mount point - that
>>>> should create the xattr on this as well.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Nithya
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 21:01, Matthew Benstead
>>>> <matthewb at uvic.ca <mailto:matthewb at uvic.ca>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I've just noticed one brick in my 7 node distribute
>>>> volume is missing
>>>> the trusted.glusterfs.dht xattr...? How can I fix this?
>>>>
>>>> I'm running glusterfs-5.3-2.el7.x86_64 on CentOS 7.
>>>>
>>>> All of the other nodes are fine, but gluster07 from the
>>>> list below does
>>>> not have the attribute.
>>>>
>>>> $ ansible -i hosts gluster-servers[0:6] ... -m shell -a
>>>> "getfattr -m .
>>>> --absolute-names -n trusted.glusterfs.dht -e hex
>>>> /mnt/raid6-storage/storage"
>>>> ...
>>>> gluster05 | SUCCESS | rc=0 >>
>>>> # file: /mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>>>> trusted.glusterfs.dht=0x0000000100000000000000002aaaaaa9
>>>>
>>>> gluster03 | SUCCESS | rc=0 >>
>>>> # file: /mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>>>> trusted.glusterfs.dht=0x0000000100000000aaaaaaa8d5555551
>>>>
>>>> gluster04 | SUCCESS | rc=0 >>
>>>> # file: /mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>>>> trusted.glusterfs.dht=0x0000000100000000d5555552ffffffff
>>>>
>>>> gluster06 | SUCCESS | rc=0 >>
>>>> # file: /mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>>>> trusted.glusterfs.dht=0x00000001000000002aaaaaaa55555553
>>>>
>>>> gluster02 | SUCCESS | rc=0 >>
>>>> # file: /mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>>>> trusted.glusterfs.dht=0x00000001000000007ffffffeaaaaaaa7
>>>>
>>>> gluster07 | FAILED | rc=1 >>
>>>> /mnt/raid6-storage/storage: trusted.glusterfs.dht: No such
>>>> attributenon-zero return code
>>>>
>>>> gluster01 | SUCCESS | rc=0 >>
>>>> # file: /mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>>>> trusted.glusterfs.dht=0x0000000100000000555555547ffffffd
>>>>
>>>> Here are all of the attr's from the brick:
>>>>
>>>> [root at gluster07 ~]# getfattr --absolute-names -m . -d
>>>> -e hex
>>>> /mnt/raid6-storage/storage/
>>>> # file: /mnt/raid6-storage/storage/
>>>> security.selinux=0x756e636f6e66696e65645f753a6f626a6563745f723a756e6c6162656c65645f743a733000
>>>> trusted.gfid=0x00000000000000000000000000000001
>>>> trusted.glusterfs.6f95525a-94d7-4174-bac4-e1a18fe010a2.xtime=0x5d2dee800001fdf9
>>>> trusted.glusterfs.quota.dirty=0x3000
>>>> trusted.glusterfs.quota.size.2=0x00001b69498a1400000000000076332e000000000005cd03
>>>> trusted.glusterfs.volume-id=0x6f95525a94d74174bac4e1a18fe010a2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And here is the volume information:
>>>>
>>>> [root at gluster07 ~]# gluster volume info storage
>>>>
>>>> Volume Name: storage
>>>> Type: Distribute
>>>> Volume ID: 6f95525a-94d7-4174-bac4-e1a18fe010a2
>>>> Status: Started
>>>> Snapshot Count: 0
>>>> Number of Bricks: 7
>>>> Transport-type: tcp
>>>> Bricks:
>>>> Brick1: 10.0.231.50:/mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>>>> Brick2: 10.0.231.51:/mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>>>> Brick3: 10.0.231.52:/mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>>>> Brick4: 10.0.231.53:/mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>>>> Brick5: 10.0.231.54:/mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>>>> Brick6: 10.0.231.55:/mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>>>> Brick7: 10.0.231.56:/mnt/raid6-storage/storage
>>>> Options Reconfigured:
>>>> changelog.changelog: on
>>>> features.quota-deem-statfs: on
>>>> features.read-only: off
>>>> features.inode-quota: on
>>>> features.quota: on
>>>> performance.readdir-ahead: on
>>>> nfs.disable: on
>>>> geo-replication.indexing: on
>>>> geo-replication.ignore-pid-check: on
>>>> transport.address-family: inet
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Matthew
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>> <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
>>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20190726/e106a785/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list