[Gluster-users] java application crushes while reading a zip file
Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan
atumball at redhat.com
Tue Jan 22 06:00:42 UTC 2019
Dmitry,
Thanks for the detailed updates on this thread. Let us know how your
'production' setup is running. For much smoother next upgrade, we request
you to help out with some early testing of glusterfs-6 RC builds which are
expected to be out by Feb 1st week.
Also, if it is possible for you to automate the tests, it would be great to
have it in our regression, so we can always be sure your setup would never
break in future releases.
Regards,
Amar
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:42 PM Dmitry Isakbayev <isakdim at gmail.com> wrote:
> This system is going into production. I will try to replicate this
> problem on the next installation.
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 9:25 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 9:59 PM Dmitry Isakbayev <isakdim at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Still no JVM crushes. Is it possible that running glusterfs with
>>> performance options turned off for a couple of days cleared out the "stale
>>> metadata issue"?
>>>
>>
>> restarting these options, would've cleared the existing cache and hence
>> previous stale metadata would've been cleared. Hitting stale metadata
>> again depends on races. That might be the reason you are still not seeing
>> the issue. Can you try with enabling all perf xlators (default
>> configuration)?
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 1:38 PM Dmitry Isakbayev <isakdim at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The software ran with all of the options turned off over the weekend
>>>> without any problems.
>>>> I will try to collect the debug info for you. I have re-enabled the 3
>>>> three options, but yet to see the problem reoccurring.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 6:46 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa <
>>>> rgowdapp at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Dmitry. Can you provide the following debug info I asked
>>>>> earlier:
>>>>>
>>>>> * strace -ff -v ... of java application
>>>>> * dump of the I/O traffic seen by the mountpoint (use --dump-fuse
>>>>> while mounting).
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> Raghavendra
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 2:08 AM Dmitry Isakbayev <isakdim at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> These 3 options seem to trigger both (reading zip file and renaming
>>>>>> files) problems.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Options Reconfigured:
>>>>>> performance.io-cache: off
>>>>>> performance.stat-prefetch: off
>>>>>> performance.quick-read: off
>>>>>> performance.parallel-readdir: off
>>>>>> *performance.readdir-ahead: on*
>>>>>> *performance.write-behind: on*
>>>>>> *performance.read-ahead: on*
>>>>>> performance.client-io-threads: off
>>>>>> nfs.disable: on
>>>>>> transport.address-family: inet
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 10:24 AM Dmitry Isakbayev <isakdim at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Turning a single option on at a time still worked fine. I will keep
>>>>>>> trying.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We had used 4.1.5 on KVM/CentOS7.5 at AWS without these issues or
>>>>>>> log messages. Do you suppose these issues are triggered by the new
>>>>>>> environment or did not exist in 4.1.5?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [root at node1 ~]# glusterfs --version
>>>>>>> glusterfs 4.1.5
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On AWS using
>>>>>>> [root at node1 ~]# hostnamectl
>>>>>>> Static hostname: node1
>>>>>>> Icon name: computer-vm
>>>>>>> Chassis: vm
>>>>>>> Machine ID: b30d0f2110ac3807b210c19ede3ce88f
>>>>>>> Boot ID: 52bb159a0aa94043a40e7c7651967bd9
>>>>>>> Virtualization: kvm
>>>>>>> Operating System: CentOS Linux 7 (Core)
>>>>>>> CPE OS Name: cpe:/o:centos:centos:7
>>>>>>> Kernel: Linux 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.x86_64
>>>>>>> Architecture: x86-64
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 8:56 AM Raghavendra Gowdappa <
>>>>>>> rgowdapp at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 7:23 PM Dmitry Isakbayev <isakdim at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ok. I will try different options.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This system is scheduled to go into production soon. What version
>>>>>>>>> would you recommend to roll back to?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> These are long standing issues. So, rolling back may not make these
>>>>>>>> issues go away. Instead if you think performance is agreeable to you,
>>>>>>>> please keep these xlators off in production.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa <
>>>>>>>>> rgowdapp at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 3:13 AM Dmitry Isakbayev <
>>>>>>>>>> isakdim at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Raghavendra,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank for the suggestion.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am suing
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [root at jl-fanexoss1p glusterfs]# gluster --version
>>>>>>>>>>> glusterfs 5.0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On
>>>>>>>>>>> [root at jl-fanexoss1p glusterfs]# hostnamectl
>>>>>>>>>>> Icon name: computer-vm
>>>>>>>>>>> Chassis: vm
>>>>>>>>>>> Machine ID: e44b8478ef7a467d98363614f4e50535
>>>>>>>>>>> Boot ID: eed98992fdda4c88bdd459a89101766b
>>>>>>>>>>> Virtualization: vmware
>>>>>>>>>>> Operating System: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 7.5 (Maipo)
>>>>>>>>>>> CPE OS Name: cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7.5:GA:server
>>>>>>>>>>> Kernel: Linux 3.10.0-862.14.4.el7.x86_64
>>>>>>>>>>> Architecture: x86-64
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have configured the following options
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [root at jl-fanexoss1p glusterfs]# gluster volume info
>>>>>>>>>>> Volume Name: gv0
>>>>>>>>>>> Type: Replicate
>>>>>>>>>>> Volume ID: 5ffbda09-c5e2-4abc-b89e-79b5d8a40824
>>>>>>>>>>> Status: Started
>>>>>>>>>>> Snapshot Count: 0
>>>>>>>>>>> Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3
>>>>>>>>>>> Transport-type: tcp
>>>>>>>>>>> Bricks:
>>>>>>>>>>> Brick1: jl-fanexoss1p.cspire.net:/data/brick1/gv0
>>>>>>>>>>> Brick2: sl-fanexoss2p.cspire.net:/data/brick1/gv0
>>>>>>>>>>> Brick3: nxquorum1p.cspire.net:/data/brick1/gv0
>>>>>>>>>>> Options Reconfigured:
>>>>>>>>>>> performance.io-cache: off
>>>>>>>>>>> performance.stat-prefetch: off
>>>>>>>>>>> performance.quick-read: off
>>>>>>>>>>> performance.parallel-readdir: off
>>>>>>>>>>> performance.readdir-ahead: off
>>>>>>>>>>> performance.write-behind: off
>>>>>>>>>>> performance.read-ahead: off
>>>>>>>>>>> performance.client-io-threads: off
>>>>>>>>>>> nfs.disable: on
>>>>>>>>>>> transport.address-family: inet
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know if it is related, but I am seeing a lot of
>>>>>>>>>>> [2018-12-27 20:19:23.776080] W [MSGID: 114031]
>>>>>>>>>>> [client-rpc-fops_v2.c:1932:client4_0_seek_cbk] 2-gv0-client-0: remote
>>>>>>>>>>> operation failed [No such device or address]
>>>>>>>>>>> [2018-12-27 20:19:47.735190] E [MSGID: 101191]
>>>>>>>>>>> [event-epoll.c:671:event_dispatch_epoll_worker] 2-epoll: Failed to dispatch
>>>>>>>>>>> handler
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> These msgs were introduced by patch [1]. To the best of my
>>>>>>>>>> knowledge they are benign. We'll be sending a patch to fix these msgs
>>>>>>>>>> though.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +Mohit Agrawal <moagrawa at redhat.com> +Milind Changire
>>>>>>>>>> <mchangir at redhat.com> . Can you try to identify why we are
>>>>>>>>>> seeing these messages? If possible please send a patch to fix this.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>> https://review.gluster.org/r/I578c3fc67713f4234bd3abbec5d3fbba19059ea5
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And java.io exceptions trying to rename files.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> When you see the errors is it possible to collect,
>>>>>>>>>> * strace of the java application (strace -ff -v ...)
>>>>>>>>>> * fuse-dump of the glusterfs mount (use option --dump-fuse while
>>>>>>>>>> mounting)?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I also need another favour from you. By trail and error, can you
>>>>>>>>>> point out which of the many performance xlators you've turned off is
>>>>>>>>>> causing the issue?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The above two data-points will help us to fix the problem.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank You,
>>>>>>>>>>> Dmitry
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 3:48 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa <
>>>>>>>>>>> rgowdapp at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What version of glusterfs are you using? It might be either
>>>>>>>>>>>> * a stale metadata issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>> * inconsistent ctime issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you try turning off all performance xlators? If the issue
>>>>>>>>>>>> is 1, that should help.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 1:51 AM Dmitry Isakbayev <
>>>>>>>>>>>> isakdim at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attempted to set 'performance.read-ahead off` according to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7041
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That did not help.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 2:11 PM Dmitry Isakbayev <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> isakdim at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The core file generated by JVM suggests that it happens
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because the file is changing while it is being read -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8186557.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The application reads in the zipfile and goes through the zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entries, then reloads the file and goes the zip entries again. It does so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 times. The application never crushes on the 1st cycle but sometimes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crushes on the 2nd or 3rd cycle.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The zip file is generated about 20 seconds prior to it being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used and is not updated or even used by any other application. I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never seen this problem on a plain file system.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would appreciate any suggestions on how to go debugging
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this issue. I can change the source code of the java application.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dmitry
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
--
Amar Tumballi (amarts)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20190122/45425288/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list