[Gluster-users] Creating cluster replica on 2 nodes 2 bricks each.

Jose Sanchez josesanc at carc.unm.edu
Tue Jan 16 16:14:30 UTC 2018


Hello Atin

I have tried the force command at the end of add-brick command, and it says that failed. It adds to the status but not info commands. Im running 3.8.15 

Any suggestions will be appreciated

Thanks

Jose





---------------------------------
Jose Sanchez
Systems/Network Analyst 1
Center of Advanced Research Computing
1601 Central Ave.
MSC 01 1190
Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001
carc.unm.edu <http://carc.unm.edu/>
575.636.4232

> On Jan 15, 2018, at 6:06 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 at 21:16, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com <mailto:nbalacha at redhat.com>> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jose Sanchez <josesanc at carc.unm.edu <mailto:josesanc at carc.unm.edu>>
> Date: 11 January 2018 at 22:05
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Creating cluster replica on 2 nodes 2 bricks each.
> To: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com <mailto:nbalacha at redhat.com>>
> Cc: gluster-users <gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:gluster-users at gluster.org>>
> 
> 
> Hi Nithya
> 
> Thanks for helping me with this, I understand now , but I  have few questions. 
> 
> When i had it setup in replica (just 2 nodes with 2 bricks) and tried to added , it failed. 
> 
>> [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume add-brick scratch replica 2 gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
>> volume add-brick: failed: /gdata/brick2/scratch is already part of a volume
> 
> Did you try the add brick operation several times with the same bricks? If yes, that could be the cause as Gluster sets xattrs on the brick root directory.
> 
> and after that, I  ran the status and info in it and on the status i get just the two brikcs
> 
>> Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch     49152     49153      Y       3140 
>> Brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch     49153     49154      Y       2634
> 
> and on the info i get all 4 ( 2 x2)   is this normal?? behavior?
> 
> So the brick count does not match for the same volume in the gluster volume status and gluster volume info commands? No, that is not normal.
> 
>> Bricks:
>> Brick1: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
>> Brick2: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
>> Brick3: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
>> Brick4: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
> 
> 
>  
> Now when i try to mount it , i still get only 14 tb and not 28? Am i doing something wrong? also when I start/stop services, cluster goes back to replicated mode from distributed-replicate
> 
> If the fuse mount sees only 2 bricks , that would explain the 14TB.
> 
> gluster01ib:/scratch   14T   34M   14T   1% /mnt/gluster_test
> 
> —— Gluster mount log file ——
> 
> [2018-01-11 16:06:44.963043] I [MSGID: 114046] [client-handshake.c:1216:client_setvolume_cbk] 0-scratch-client-1: Connected to scratch-client-1, attached to remote volume '/gdata/brick1/scratch'.
> [2018-01-11 16:06:44.963065] I [MSGID: 114047] [client-handshake.c:1227:client_setvolume_cbk] 0-scratch-client-1: Server and Client lk-version numbers are not same, reopening the fds
> [2018-01-11 16:06:44.968291] I [MSGID: 114035] [client-handshake.c:202:client_set_lk_version_cbk] 0-scratch-client-1: Server lk version = 1
> [2018-01-11 16:06:44.968404] I [fuse-bridge.c:4147:fuse_init] 0-glusterfs-fuse: FUSE inited with protocol versions: glusterfs 7.24 kernel 7.22
> [2018-01-11 16:06:44.968438] I [fuse-bridge.c:4832:fuse_graph_sync] 0-fuse: switched to graph 0
> [2018-01-11 16:06:44.969544] I [MSGID: 108031] [afr-common.c:2166:afr_local_discovery_cbk] 0-scratch-replicate-0: selecting local read_child scratch-client-0
> 
> —— CLI  Log File  ——
> 
> [root at gluster01 glusterfs]# tail cli.log
> [2018-01-11 15:54:14.468122] I [socket.c:2403:socket_event_handler] 0-transport: disconnecting now
> [2018-01-11 15:54:14.468737] I [cli-rpc-ops.c:817:gf_cli_get_volume_cbk] 0-cli: Received resp to get vol: 0
> [2018-01-11 15:54:14.469462] I [cli-rpc-ops.c:817:gf_cli_get_volume_cbk] 0-cli: Received resp to get vol: 0
> [2018-01-11 15:54:14.469530] I [input.c:31:cli_batch] 0-: Exiting with: 0
> [2018-01-11 16:03:40.422568] I [cli.c:728:main] 0-cli: Started running gluster with version 3.8.15
> [2018-01-11 16:03:40.430195] I [cli-cmd-volume.c:1828:cli_check_gsync_present] 0-: geo-replication not installed
> [2018-01-11 16:03:40.430492] I [MSGID: 101190] [event-epoll.c:628:event_dispatch_epoll_worker] 0-epoll: Started thread with index 1
> [2018-01-11 16:03:40.430568] I [socket.c:2403:socket_event_handler] 0-transport: disconnecting now
> [2018-01-11 16:03:40.485256] I [cli-rpc-ops.c:2244:gf_cli_set_volume_cbk] 0-cli: Received resp to set
> [2018-01-11 16:03:40.485497] I [input.c:31:cli_batch] 0-: Exiting with: 0
> 
> —— etc-glusterfs-glusterd.vol.log — 
> 
> [2018-01-10 14:59:23.676814] I [MSGID: 106499] [glusterd-handler.c:4349:__glusterd_handle_status_volume] 0-management: Received status volume req for volume scratch
> [2018-01-10 15:00:29.516071] I [MSGID: 106488] [glusterd-handler.c:1537:__glusterd_handle_cli_get_volume] 0-management: Received get vol req
> [2018-01-10 15:01:09.872082] I [MSGID: 106482] [glusterd-brick-ops.c:447:__glusterd_handle_add_brick] 0-management: Received add brick req
> [2018-01-10 15:01:09.872128] I [MSGID: 106578] [glusterd-brick-ops.c:499:__glusterd_handle_add_brick] 0-management: replica-count is 2
> [2018-01-10 15:01:09.876763] E [MSGID: 106451] [glusterd-utils.c:6207:glusterd_is_path_in_use] 0-management: /gdata/brick2/scratch is already part of a volume [File exists]
> [2018-01-10 15:01:09.876807] W [MSGID: 106122] [glusterd-mgmt.c:188:gd_mgmt_v3_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: ADD-brick prevalidation failed.
> [2018-01-10 15:01:09.876822] E [MSGID: 106122] [glusterd-mgmt.c:884:glusterd_mgmt_v3_pre_validate] 0-management: Pre Validation failed for operation Add brick on local node
> [2018-01-10 15:01:09.876834] E [MSGID: 106122] [glusterd-mgmt.c:2009:glusterd_mgmt_v3_initiate_all_phases] 0-management: Pre Validation Failed
> [2018-01-10 15:01:16.005881] I [run.c:191:runner_log] (-->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.8.15/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so(+0x33045) [0x7f1066d15045] -->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.8.15/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so(+0xcbd85) [0x7f1066dadd85] -->/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(runner_log+0x115) [0x7f10726491e5] ) 0-management: Ran script: /var/lib/glusterd/hooks/1/add-brick/pre/S28Quota-enable-root-xattr-heal.sh --volname=scratch --version=1 --volume-op=add-brick --gd-workdir=/var/lib/glusterd
> [2018-01-10 15:01:15.982929] E [MSGID: 106451] [glusterd-utils.c:6207:glusterd_is_path_in_use] 0-management: /gdata/brick2/scratch is already part of a volume [File exists]
> [2018-01-10 15:01:16.005959] I [MSGID: 106578] [glusterd-brick-ops.c:1352:glusterd_op_perform_add_bricks] 0-management: replica-count is set 0
> 
> Atin, is this correct? It looks like it tries to add the bricks even though the prevalidation failed
> 
> I’m guessing that if a force option is passed this validation is overruled? But to confirm I need what exact version are you running with?
> 
> 
> 
> [2018-01-10 15:01:16.006018] I [MSGID: 106578] [glusterd-brick-ops.c:1362:glusterd_op_perform_add_bricks] 0-management: type is set 0, need to change it
> [2018-01-10 15:01:16.062001] I [MSGID: 106143] [glusterd-pmap.c:250:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick /gdata/brick2/scratch on port 49154
> [2018-01-10 15:01:16.062137] I [MSGID: 106143] [glusterd-pmap.c:250:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick /gdata/brick2/scratch.rdma on port 49155
> [2018-01-10 15:01:16.062673] E [MSGID: 106005] [glusterd-utils.c:4877:glusterd_brick_start] 0-management: Unable to start brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
> [2018-01-10 15:01:16.062715] E [MSGID: 106074] [glusterd-brick-ops.c:2493:glusterd_op_add_brick] 0-glusterd: Unable to add bricks
> [2018-01-10 15:01:16.062729] E [MSGID: 106123] [glusterd-mgmt.c:294:gd_mgmt_v3_commit_fn] 0-management: Add-brick commit failed.
> [2018-01-10 15:01:16.062741] E [MSGID: 106123] [glusterd-mgmt.c:1427:glusterd_mgmt_v3_commit] 0-management: Commit failed for operation Add brick on local node
> [2018-01-10 15:01:16.062754] E [MSGID: 106123] [glusterd-mgmt.c:2018:glusterd_mgmt_v3_initiate_all_phases] 0-management: Commit Op Failed
> [2018-01-10 15:01:35.914090] I [MSGID: 106499] [glusterd-handler.c:4349:__glusterd_handle_status_volume] 0-management: Received status volume req for volume scratch
> [2018-01-10 15:01:15.979236] I [MSGID: 106482] [glusterd-brick-ops.c:447:__glusterd_handle_add_brick] 0-management: Received add brick req
> [2018-01-10 15:01:15.979250] I [MSGID: 106578] [glusterd-brick-ops.c:499:__glusterd_handle_add_brick] 0-management: replica-count is 2
> The message "I [MSGID: 106488] [glusterd-handler.c:1537:__glusterd_handle_cli_get_volume] 0-management: Received get vol req" repeated 3 times between [2018-01-10 15:00:29.516071] and [2018-01-10 15:01:39.652014]
> [2018-01-10 16:16:42.776653] I [MSGID: 106488] [glusterd-handler.c:1537:__glusterd_handle_cli_get_volume] 0-management: Received get vol req
> [2018-01-10 16:16:42.777614] I [MSGID: 106488] [glusterd-handler.c:1537:__glusterd_handle_cli_get_volume] 0-management: Received get vol req
> [2018-01-11 15:45:09.023393] I [MSGID: 106488] [glusterd-handler.c:1537:__glusterd_handle_cli_get_volume] 0-management: Received get vol req
> [2018-01-11 15:45:19.916301] I [MSGID: 106499] [glusterd-handler.c:4349:__glusterd_handle_status_volume] 0-management: Received status volume req for volume scratch
> [2018-01-11 15:45:09.024217] I [MSGID: 106488] [glusterd-handler.c:1537:__glusterd_handle_cli_get_volume] 0-management: Received get vol req
> [2018-01-11 15:54:10.172137] I [MSGID: 106499] [glusterd-handler.c:4349:__glusterd_handle_status_volume] 0-management: Received status volume req for volume scratch
> [2018-01-11 15:54:14.468529] I [MSGID: 106488] [glusterd-handler.c:1537:__glusterd_handle_cli_get_volume] 0-management: Received get vol req
> [2018-01-11 15:54:14.469408] I [MSGID: 106488] [glusterd-handler.c:1537:__glusterd_handle_cli_get_volume] 0-management: Received get vol req
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jose
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Jose Sanchez
> Center of Advanced Research Computing
> Albuquerque, NM 87131
> 
> 
>> On Jan 10, 2018, at 9:02 PM, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com <mailto:nbalacha at redhat.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jose,
>> 
>> Gluster is working as expected. The Distribute-replicated type just means that there are now 2 replica sets and files will be distributed across them. 
>> A volume of type Replicate (1xn where n is the number of bricks in the replica set) indicates there is no distribution  (all files on the volume will be present on all the bricks in the volume). 
>>  
>> A volume of type Distributed-Replicate indicates the volume is both distributed (as in files will only be created on one of the replicated sets) and replicated.  So in the above example, a file will exist on either Brick1 and Brick2 or Brick3 and Brick4. 
>> 
>> 
>> After the add brick, the volume will have a total capacity of 28TB and store 2 copies of every file. Let me know if that is not what you are looking for.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Nithya
>> 
>> 
>> On 10 January 2018 at 20:40, Jose Sanchez <josesanc at carc.unm.edu <mailto:josesanc at carc.unm.edu>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Nithya
>> 
>> This is what i have so far, I have peer both cluster nodes together as replica, from node 1A and 1B , now when i tried to add it , i get the error that it is already part of a volume. when i run the cluster volume info , i see that has switch to distributed-replica. 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Jose
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume status
>> Status of volume: scratch
>> Gluster process                             TCP Port  RDMA Port  Online  Pid
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch     49152     49153      Y       3140 
>> Brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch     49153     49154      Y       2634 
>> Self-heal Daemon on localhost               N/A       N/A        Y       3132 
>> Self-heal Daemon on gluster02ib             N/A       N/A        Y       2626 
>>  
>> Task Status of Volume scratch
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> There are no active volume tasks
>>  
>> [root at gluster01 ~]#
>> 
>> [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume info
>>  
>> Volume Name: scratch
>> Type: Replicate
>> Volume ID: a6e20f7d-13ed-4293-ab8b-d783d1748246
>> Status: Started
>> Snapshot Count: 0
>> Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2
>> Transport-type: tcp,rdma
>> Bricks:
>> Brick1: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
>> Brick2: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
>> Options Reconfigured:
>> performance.readdir-ahead: on
>> nfs.disable: on
>> [root at gluster01 ~]#
>> 
>> 
>> -------------------------------------
>> 
>> [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume add-brick scratch replica 2 gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
>> volume add-brick: failed: /gdata/brick2/scratch is already part of a volume
>> 
>> 
>> [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume status
>> Status of volume: scratch
>> Gluster process                             TCP Port  RDMA Port  Online  Pid
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch     49152     49153      Y       3140 
>> Brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch     49153     49154      Y       2634 
>> Self-heal Daemon on gluster02ib             N/A       N/A        Y       2626 
>> Self-heal Daemon on localhost               N/A       N/A        Y       3132 
>>  
>> Task Status of Volume scratch
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> There are no active volume tasks
>>  
>> [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume info
>>  
>> Volume Name: scratch
>> Type: Distributed-Replicate
>> Volume ID: a6e20f7d-13ed-4293-ab8b-d783d1748246
>> Status: Started
>> Snapshot Count: 0
>> Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4
>> Transport-type: tcp,rdma
>> Bricks:
>> Brick1: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
>> Brick2: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
>> Brick3: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
>> Brick4: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
>> Options Reconfigured:
>> performance.readdir-ahead: on
>> nfs.disable: on
>> [root at gluster01 ~]# 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --------------------------------
>> Jose Sanchez
>> Center of Advanced Research Computing
>> Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001
>> carc.unm.edu <http://carc.unm.edu/>
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jan 9, 2018, at 9:04 PM, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com <mailto:nbalacha at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Please let us know what commands you ran so far and the output of the gluster volume info command.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Nithya
>>> 
>>> On 9 January 2018 at 23:06, Jose Sanchez <josesanc at carc.unm.edu <mailto:josesanc at carc.unm.edu>> wrote:
>>> Hello
>>> 
>>> We are trying to setup Gluster for our project/scratch storage HPC machine using a replicated mode with 2 nodes, 2 bricks each (14tb each). 
>>> 
>>> Our goal is to be able to have a replicated system between node 1 and 2 (A bricks) and add an additional 2 bricks (B bricks)  from the 2 nodes. so we can have a total of 28tb replicated mode. 
>>> 
>>> Node 1 [ (Brick A) (Brick B) ]
>>> Node 2 [ (Brick A) (Brick B) ]
>>> --------------------------------------------
>>> 		14Tb + 14Tb = 28Tb
>>> 
>>> At this  I was able to create the replica nodes between node 1 and 2 (brick A) but I’ve not been able to add to the replica together, Gluster switches to distributed replica   when i add it with only 14Tb.
>>> 
>>> Any help will be appreciated.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Jose
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Jose Sanchez
>>> Center of Advanced Research Computing
>>> Albuquerque, NM 87131
>>> carc.unm.edu <http://carc.unm.edu/>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> - Atin (atinm)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180116/ca25f06c/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list