[Gluster-users] ganesha.nfsd process dies when copying files

[Karli Sjöberg]

On Fri, 2018-08-10 at 21:23 +0800, Pui Edylie wrote:
> Hi Karli,
> 
> Storhaug works with glusterfs 4.1.2 and latest nfs-ganesha.
> 
> I just installed them last weekend ... they are working very well :)

Okay, awesome!

Is there any documentation on how to do that?

/K

> 
> Cheers,
> Edy
> 
> On 8/10/2018 9:08 PM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-08-10 at 08:39 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> > > On 08/10/2018 08:08 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
> > > > Hey all!
> > > > ...
> > > > 
> > > > glusterfs-client-xlators-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64
> > > > glusterfs-api-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64
> > > > nfs-ganesha-2.4.5-1.el7.x86_64
> > > > centos-release-gluster310-1.0-1.el7.centos.noarch
> > > > glusterfs-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64
> > > > glusterfs-cli-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64
> > > > nfs-ganesha-gluster-2.4.5-1.el7.x86_64
> > > > glusterfs-server-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64
> > > > glusterfs-libs-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64
> > > > glusterfs-fuse-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64
> > > > glusterfs-ganesha-3.10.12-1.el7.x86_64
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > For nfs-ganesha problems you'd really be better served by posting
> > > to
> > > support@ or devel at lists.nfs-ganesha.org.
> > > 
> > > Both glusterfs-3.10 and nfs-ganesha-2.4 are really old.
> > > glusterfs-
> > > 3.10
> > > is even officially EOL. Ganesha isn't really organized  enough to
> > > have
> > > done anything as bold as officially declaring 2.4 as having
> > > reached
> > > EOL.
> > > 
> > > The nfs-ganesha devs are currently working on 2.7; maintaining
> > > and
> > > supporting 2.6, and less so 2.5, is pretty much at the limit of
> > > what
> > > they might be willing to help debug.
> > > 
> > > I strongly encourage you to update to a more recent version of
> > > both
> > > glusterfs and nfs-ganesha.  glusterfs-4.1 and nfs-ganesha-2.6
> > > would
> > > be
> > > ideal. Then if you still have problems you're much more likely to
> > > get
> > > help.
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi, thank you for your answer, but it raises even more questions
> > about
> > any potential production deployment.
> > 
> > Actually, I knew that the versions are old, but it seems to me that
> > you
> > are contradicting yourself:
> > 
> > https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-July/031753.
> > html
> > 
> > "After 3.10 you'd need to use storhaug.... Which.... doesn't work
> > (yet).
> > 
> > You need to use 3.10 for now."
> > 
> > So how is that supposed to work?
> > 
> > Is there documentation for how to get there?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance!
> > 
> > /K
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180810/7a5556d0/attachment.sig>