[Gluster-users] Turn off replication

Jose Sanchez josesanc at carc.unm.edu
Wed Apr 25 22:17:17 UTC 2018


Looking at the logs , it seems that it is trying to add using the same port was assigned for gluster01ib:


Any Ideas??

Jose



[2018-04-25 22:08:55.169302] I [MSGID: 106482] [glusterd-brick-ops.c:447:__glusterd_handle_add_brick] 0-management: Received add brick req
[2018-04-25 22:08:55.186037] I [run.c:191:runner_log] (-->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.8.15/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so(+0x33045) [0x7f5464b9b045] -->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.8.15/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so(+0xcbd85) [0x7f5464c33d85] -->/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0(runner_log+0x115) [0x7f54704cf1e5] ) 0-management: Ran script: /var/lib/glusterd/hooks/1/add-brick/pre/S28Quota-enable-root-xattr-heal.sh --volname=scratch --version=1 --volume-op=add-brick --gd-workdir=/var/lib/glusterd
[2018-04-25 22:08:55.309534] I [MSGID: 106143] [glusterd-pmap.c:250:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick /gdata/brick1/scratch on port 49152
[2018-04-25 22:08:55.309659] I [MSGID: 106143] [glusterd-pmap.c:250:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick /gdata/brick1/scratch.rdma on port 49153
[2018-04-25 22:08:55.310231] E [MSGID: 106005] [glusterd-utils.c:4877:glusterd_brick_start] 0-management: Unable to start brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
[2018-04-25 22:08:55.310275] E [MSGID: 106074] [glusterd-brick-ops.c:2493:glusterd_op_add_brick] 0-glusterd: Unable to add bricks
[2018-04-25 22:08:55.310304] E [MSGID: 106123] [glusterd-mgmt.c:294:gd_mgmt_v3_commit_fn] 0-management: Add-brick commit failed.
[2018-04-25 22:08:55.310316] E [MSGID: 106123] [glusterd-mgmt.c:1427:glusterd_mgmt_v3_commit] 0-management: Commit failed for operation Add brick on local node
[2018-04-25 22:08:55.310330] E [MSGID: 106123] [glusterd-mgmt.c:2018:glusterd_mgmt_v3_initiate_all_phases] 0-management: Commit Op Failed
[2018-04-25 22:09:11.678141] E [MSGID: 106452] [glusterd-utils.c:6064:glusterd_new_brick_validate] 0-management: Brick: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or be contained by an existing brick
[2018-04-25 22:09:11.678184] W [MSGID: 106122] [glusterd-mgmt.c:188:gd_mgmt_v3_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: ADD-brick prevalidation failed.
[2018-04-25 22:09:11.678200] E [MSGID: 106122] [glusterd-mgmt-handler.c:337:glusterd_handle_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: Pre Validation failed on operation Add brick
[root at gluster02 glusterfs]# gluster volume status scratch
Status of volume: scratch
Gluster process                             TCP Port  RDMA Port  Online  Pid
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch     49152     49153      Y       1819 
Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch     49154     49155      Y       1827 
Brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch     N/A       N/A        N       N/A  
 
Task Status of Volume scratch
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are no active volume tasks
 
[root at gluster02 glusterfs]# 



> On Apr 25, 2018, at 3:23 PM, Jose Sanchez <josesanc at carc.unm.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hello Karthik
> 
> 
> Im having trouble adding the two bricks back online.  Any help is appreciated  
> 
> thanks 
> 
> 
> when i try to add-brick command this is what i get 
> 
> [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume add-brick scratch gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch/
> volume add-brick: failed: Pre Validation failed on gluster02ib. Brick: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or be contained by an existing brick
> 
> I have run the following commands and remove the .glusterfs hidden directories 
> 
> [root at gluster02 ~]# setfattr -x trusted.glusterfs.volume-id /gdata/brick2/scratch/
> setfattr: /gdata/brick2/scratch/: No such attribute
> [root at gluster02 ~]# setfattr -x trusted.gfid /gdata/brick2/scratch/
> setfattr: /gdata/brick2/scratch/: No such attribute
> [root at gluster02 ~]# 
> 
> 
> this is what I get when I run status and info
> 
> 
> [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume info scratch
>  
> Volume Name: scratch
> Type: Distribute
> Volume ID: 23f1e4b1-b8e0-46c3-874a-58b4728ea106
> Status: Started
> Snapshot Count: 0
> Number of Bricks: 4
> Transport-type: tcp,rdma
> Bricks:
> Brick1: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
> Brick2: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
> Brick3: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
> Brick4: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
> Options Reconfigured:
> nfs.disable: on
> performance.readdir-ahead: on
> [root at gluster01 ~]# 
> 
> 
> [root at gluster02 ~]# gluster volume status scratch
> Status of volume: scratch
> Gluster process                             TCP Port  RDMA Port  Online  Pid
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch     49156     49157      Y       1819 
> Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch     49158     49159      Y       1827 
> Brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch     N/A       N/A        N       N/A  
> Brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch     N/A       N/A        N       N/A  
>  
> Task Status of Volume scratch
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> There are no active volume tasks
>  
> [root at gluster02 ~]# 
> 
> 
> This are the logs files from Gluster ETC
> 
> [2018-04-25 20:56:54.390662] I [MSGID: 106143] [glusterd-pmap.c:250:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick /gdata/brick1/scratch on port 49152
> [2018-04-25 20:56:54.390798] I [MSGID: 106143] [glusterd-pmap.c:250:pmap_registry_bind] 0-pmap: adding brick /gdata/brick1/scratch.rdma on port 49153
> [2018-04-25 20:56:54.391401] E [MSGID: 106005] [glusterd-utils.c:4877:glusterd_brick_start] 0-management: Unable to start brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
> [2018-04-25 20:56:54.391457] E [MSGID: 106074] [glusterd-brick-ops.c:2493:glusterd_op_add_brick] 0-glusterd: Unable to add bricks
> [2018-04-25 20:56:54.391476] E [MSGID: 106123] [glusterd-mgmt.c:294:gd_mgmt_v3_commit_fn] 0-management: Add-brick commit failed.
> [2018-04-25 20:56:54.391490] E [MSGID: 106123] [glusterd-mgmt-handler.c:603:glusterd_handle_commit_fn] 0-management: commit failed on operation Add brick
> [2018-04-25 20:58:55.332262] I [MSGID: 106499] [glusterd-handler.c:4349:__glusterd_handle_status_volume] 0-management: Received status volume req for volume scratch
> [2018-04-25 21:02:07.464357] E [MSGID: 106452] [glusterd-utils.c:6064:glusterd_new_brick_validate] 0-management: Brick: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or be contained by an existing brick
> [2018-04-25 21:02:07.464395] W [MSGID: 106122] [glusterd-mgmt.c:188:gd_mgmt_v3_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: ADD-brick prevalidation failed.
> [2018-04-25 21:02:07.464414] E [MSGID: 106122] [glusterd-mgmt-handler.c:337:glusterd_handle_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: Pre Validation failed on operation Add brick
> [2018-04-25 21:04:56.198662] E [MSGID: 106452] [glusterd-utils.c:6064:glusterd_new_brick_validate] 0-management: Brick: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or be contained by an existing brick
> [2018-04-25 21:04:56.198700] W [MSGID: 106122] [glusterd-mgmt.c:188:gd_mgmt_v3_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: ADD-brick prevalidation failed.
> [2018-04-25 21:04:56.198716] E [MSGID: 106122] [glusterd-mgmt-handler.c:337:glusterd_handle_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: Pre Validation failed on operation Add brick
> [2018-04-25 21:07:11.084205] I [MSGID: 106482] [glusterd-brick-ops.c:447:__glusterd_handle_add_brick] 0-management: Received add brick req
> [2018-04-25 21:07:11.087682] E [MSGID: 106452] [glusterd-utils.c:6064:glusterd_new_brick_validate] 0-management: Brick: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or be contained by an existing brick
> [2018-04-25 21:07:11.087716] W [MSGID: 106122] [glusterd-mgmt.c:188:gd_mgmt_v3_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: ADD-brick prevalidation failed.
> [2018-04-25 21:07:11.087729] E [MSGID: 106122] [glusterd-mgmt.c:884:glusterd_mgmt_v3_pre_validate] 0-management: Pre Validation failed for operation Add brick on local node
> [2018-04-25 21:07:11.087741] E [MSGID: 106122] [glusterd-mgmt.c:2009:glusterd_mgmt_v3_initiate_all_phases] 0-management: Pre Validation Failed
> [2018-04-25 21:12:22.340221] E [MSGID: 106452] [glusterd-utils.c:6064:glusterd_new_brick_validate] 0-management: Brick: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or be contained by an existing brick
> [2018-04-25 21:12:22.340259] W [MSGID: 106122] [glusterd-mgmt.c:188:gd_mgmt_v3_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: ADD-brick prevalidation failed.
> [2018-04-25 21:12:22.340274] E [MSGID: 106122] [glusterd-mgmt-handler.c:337:glusterd_handle_pre_validate_fn] 0-management: Pre Validation failed on operation Add brick
> [2018-04-25 21:18:13.427036] I [MSGID: 106499] [glusterd-handler.c:4349:__glusterd_handle_status_volume] 0-management: Received status volume req for volume scratch
> [root at gluster02 glusterfs]# 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Jose Sanchez
> Systems/Network Analyst 1
> Center of Advanced Research Computing
> 1601 Central Ave.
> MSC 01 1190
> Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001
> carc.unm.edu <http://carc.unm.edu/>
> 575.636.4232
> 
>> On Apr 12, 2018, at 12:11 AM, Karthik Subrahmanya <ksubrahm at redhat.com <mailto:ksubrahm at redhat.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 7:38 PM, Jose Sanchez <josesanc at carc.unm.edu <mailto:josesanc at carc.unm.edu>> wrote:
>> Hi Karthik
>> 
>> Looking at the information you have provided me, I would like to make sure that I’m running the right commands. 
>> 
>> 1.  	gluster volume heal scratch info
>> If the count is non zero, trigger the heal and wait for heal info count to become zero.
>> 2. 	gluster volume remove-brick scratch replica 1 gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch force
>> 3. 	gluster volume add-brick “#" scratch gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
>> 
>> 
>> Based on the configuration I have, Brick 1 from Node A and B are tide together and Brick 2 from Node A and B are also tide together. Looking at your remove command (step #2), it seems that you want me to remove Brick 1 and 2 from Node B (gluster02ib). is that correct? I thought the data was distributed in bricks 1 between nodes A and B) and duplicated on Bricks 2 (node A and B). 
>> Data is duplicated between bricks 1 of nodes A & B and bricks 2 of nodes A & B and data is distributed between these two pairs.
>> You need not always remove the bricks 1 & 2 from node B itself. The idea here is to keep one copy from both the replica pairs.
>> 
>> Also when I add the bricks back to gluster, do I need to specify if it is distributed or replicated?? and Do i need a configuration #?? for example on your command (Step #2) you have “replica 1” when remove bricks, do I need to do the same when adding the nodes back ?
>> No. You just need to erase the data on those bricks and add those bricks back to the volume. The previous remove-brick command will make the volume plain distribute. Then simply adding the bricks without specifying any "#" will expand the volume as a plain distribute volue.
>> 
>> Im planning on moving with this changes in few days. At this point each brick has 14tb and adding bricks 1 from node A and B, i have a total of 28tb, After doing all the process, (removing and adding bricks) I should be able to see a total of 56Tb right ?
>> Yes after all these you will have 56TB in total.
>> After adding the bricks, do volume rebalance, so that the data which were present previously, will be moved to the correct bricks.
>> 
>> HTH,
>> Karthik
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Jose
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------
>> Jose Sanchez
>> Systems/Network Analyst 1
>> Center of Advanced Research Computing
>> 1601 Central Ave <https://maps.google.com/?q=1601+Central+Ave&entry=gmail&source=g>.
>> MSC 01 1190
>> Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001
>> carc.unm.edu <http://carc.unm.edu/>
>> 575.636.4232
>> 
>>> On Apr 7, 2018, at 8:29 AM, Karthik Subrahmanya <ksubrahm at redhat.com <mailto:ksubrahm at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jose,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for providing the volume info. You have 2 subvolumes. Data is replicated within the bricks of that subvolumes.
>>> First one consisting of Node A's brick1 & Node B's brick1 and the second one consisting of Node A's brick2 and Node B's brick2.
>>> You don't have the same data on all the 4 bricks. Data are distributed between these two subvolumes.
>>> To remove the replica you can use the command
>>> gluster volume remove-brick scratch replica 1 gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch force
>>> So you will have one copy of data present from both the distributes.
>>> Before doing this make sure "gluster volume heal scratch info" value is zero. So copies you retain will have the correct data.
>>> After the remove-brick erase the data from the backend.
>>> Then you can expand the volume by following the steps at [1].
>>> 
>>> [1] https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Managing%20Volumes/#expanding-volumes <https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Managing%20Volumes/#expanding-volumes>
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Karthik
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Jose Sanchez <josesanc at carc.unm.edu <mailto:josesanc at carc.unm.edu>> wrote:
>>> Hi Karthik
>>> 
>>> this is our configuration,  is 2x2 =4 , they are all replicated , each brick has 14tb. we have 2 nodes A and B, each one with brick 1 and 2. 
>>> 
>>> Node A  (replicated A1 (14tb) and B1 (14tb) ) same with node B (Replicated A2 (14tb) and B2 (14tb)).
>>> 
>>> Do you think we need to degrade the node first before removing it. i believe the same copy of data is on all 4 bricks, we would like to keep one of them, and add the other bricks as extra space
>>> 
>>> Thanks for your help on this
>>> 
>>> Jose
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume info scratch
>>>  
>>> Volume Name: scratch
>>> Type: Distributed-Replicate
>>> Volume ID: 23f1e4b1-b8e0-46c3-874a-58b4728ea106
>>> Status: Started
>>> Snapshot Count: 0
>>> Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4
>>> Transport-type: tcp,rdma
>>> Bricks:
>>> Brick1: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
>>> Brick2: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch
>>> Brick3: gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
>>> Brick4: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch
>>> Options Reconfigured:
>>> performance.readdir-ahead: on
>>> nfs.disable: on
>>> 
>>> [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume status all
>>> Status of volume: scratch
>>> Gluster process                             TCP Port  RDMA Port  Online  Pid
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch     49152     49153      Y       1743 
>>> Brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick1/scratch     49156     49157      Y       1732 
>>> Brick gluster01ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch     49154     49155      Y       1738 
>>> Brick gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch     49158     49159      Y       1733 
>>> Self-heal Daemon on localhost               N/A       N/A        Y       1728 
>>> Self-heal Daemon on gluster02ib             N/A       N/A        Y       1726 
>>>  
>>> Task Status of Volume scratch
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> There are no active volume tasks
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Jose Sanchez
>>> Systems/Network Analyst 1
>>> Center of Advanced Research Computing
>>> 1601 Central Ave <https://maps.google.com/?q=1601+Central+Ave&entry=gmail&source=g>.
>>> MSC 01 1190
>>> Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001
>>> carc.unm.edu <http://carc.unm.edu/>
>>> 575.636.4232
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 6, 2018, at 3:49 AM, Karthik Subrahmanya <ksubrahm at redhat.com <mailto:ksubrahm at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Jose,
>>>> 
>>>> By switching into pure distribute volume you will lose availability if something goes bad.
>>>> 
>>>> I am guessing you have a nX2 volume.
>>>> If you want to preserve one copy of the data in all the distributes, you can do that by decreasing the replica count in the remove-brick operation.
>>>> If you have any inconsistency, heal them first using the "gluster volume heal <volname>" command and wait till the
>>>> "gluster volume heal <volname> info" output becomes zero, before removing the bricks, so that you will have the correct data.
>>>> If you do not want to preserve the data then you can directly remove the bricks.
>>>> Even after removing the bricks the data will be present in the backend of the removed bricks. You have to manually erase them (both data and .glusterfs folder).
>>>> See [1] for more details on remove-brick. 
>>>> 
>>>> [1]. https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Managing%20Volumes/#shrinking-volumes <https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Managing%20Volumes/#shrinking-volumes>
>>>> 
>>>> HTH,
>>>> Karthik
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Jose Sanchez <josesanc at carc.unm.edu <mailto:josesanc at carc.unm.edu>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> We have a Gluster setup with 2 nodes (distributed replication) and we would like to switch it to the distributed mode. I know the data is duplicated between those nodes, what is the proper way of switching it to a distributed, we would like to double or gain the storage space on our gluster storage node. what happens with the data, do i need to erase one of the nodes? 
>>>> 
>>>> Jose
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------
>>>> Jose Sanchez
>>>> Systems/Network Analyst 
>>>> Center of Advanced Research Computing
>>>> 1601 Central Ave <https://maps.google.com/?q=1601+Central+Ave&entry=gmail&source=g>.
>>>> MSC 01 1190
>>>> Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001
>>>> carc.unm.edu <http://carc.unm.edu/>
>>>> 575.636.4232
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
>>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180425/c5bcc077/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list