[Gluster-users] Slow performance of gluster volume

[Abi Askushi]

Did not upgrade yet gluster. I am still  using 3.8.12. Only the mentioned
changes did provide the performance boost.

>From which version to which version did you see such performance boost? I
will try to upgrade and check difference also.

On Sep 11, 2017 2:45 AM, "Ben Turner" <bturner at redhat.com> wrote:

Great to hear!

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Abi Askushi" <rightkicktech at gmail.com>
> To: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com>
> Cc: "gluster-user" <gluster-users at gluster.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 7:01:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Slow performance of gluster volume
>
> Following changes resolved the perf issue:
>
> Added the option
> /etc/glusterfs/glusterd.vol :
> option rpc-auth-allow-insecure on

Was it this setting or was it the gluster upgrade, do you know for sure?
It may be helpful to others to know for sure(Im interested too:).

-b

>
> restarted glusterd
>
> Then set the volume option:
> gluster volume set vms server.allow-insecure on
>
> I am reaching now the max network bandwidth and performance of VMs is
quite
> good.
>
> Did not upgrade the glusterd.
>
> As a next try I am thinking to upgrade gluster to 3.12 + test libgfapi
> integration of qemu by upgrading to ovirt 4.1.5 and check vm perf.
>
>
> On Sep 6, 2017 1:20 PM, "Abi Askushi" < rightkicktech at gmail.com > wrote:
>
>
>
> I tried to follow step from
> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage to install latest
> gluster on the first node.
> It installed 3.10 and not 3.11. I am not sure how to install 3.11 without
> compiling it.
> Then when tried to start the gluster on the node the bricks were reported
> down (the other 2 nodes have still 3.8). No sure why. The logs were
showing
> the below (even after rebooting the server):
>
> [2017-09-06 10:56:09.023777] E [rpcsvc.c:557:rpcsvc_check_and_reply_error]
> 0-rpcsvc: rpc actor failed to complete successfully
> [2017-09-06 10:56:09.024122] E [server-helpers.c:395:server_alloc_frame]
> (-->/lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpcsvc_handle_rpc_call+0x325) [0x7f2d0ec20905]
> -->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.10.5/xlator/protocol/server.so(+0x3006b)
> [0x7f2cfa4bf06b]
> -->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.10.5/xlator/protocol/server.so(+0xdb34)
> [0x7f2cfa49cb34] ) 0-server: invalid argument: client [Invalid argument]
>
> Do I need to upgrade all nodes before I attempt to start the gluster
> services?
> I reverted the first node back to 3.8 at the moment and all restored.
> Also tests with eager lock disabled did not make any difference.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Krutika Dhananjay < kdhananj at redhat.com >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Do you see any improvement with 3.11.1 as that has a patch that improves
perf
> for this kind of a workload
>
> Also, could you disable eager-lock and check if that helps? I see that max
> time is being spent in acquiring locks.
>
> -Krutika
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Abi Askushi < rightkicktech at gmail.com >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Krutika,
>
> Is it anything in the profile indicating what is causing this bottleneck?
In
> case i can collect any other info let me know.
>
> Thanx
>
> On Sep 5, 2017 13:27, "Abi Askushi" < rightkicktech at gmail.com > wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Krutika,
>
> Attached the profile stats. I enabled profiling then ran some dd tests.
Also
> 3 Windows VMs are running on top this volume but did not do any stress
> testing on the VMs. I have left the profiling enabled in case more time is
> needed for useful stats.
>
> Thanx
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Krutika Dhananjay < kdhananj at redhat.com >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> OK my understanding is that with preallocated disks the performance with
and
> without shard will be the same.
>
> In any case, please attach the volume profile[1], so we can see what else
is
> slowing things down.
>
> -Krutika
>
> [1] -
> https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%
20Guide/Monitoring%20Workload/#running-glusterfs-volume-profile-command
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Abi Askushi < rightkicktech at gmail.com >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Krutika,
>
> I already have a preallocated disk on VM.
> Now I am checking performance with dd on the hypervisors which have the
> gluster volume configured.
>
> I tried also several values of shard-block-size and I keep getting the
same
> low values on write performance.
> Enabling client-io-threads also did not have any affect.
>
> The version of gluster I am using is glusterfs 3.8.12 built on May 11 2017
> 18:46:20.
> The setup is a set of 3 Centos 7.3 servers and ovirt 4.1, using gluster as
> storage.
>
> Below are the current settings:
>
>
> Volume Name: vms
> Type: Replicate
> Volume ID: 4513340d-7919-498b-bfe0-d836b5cea40b
> Status: Started
> Snapshot Count: 0
> Number of Bricks: 1 x (2 + 1) = 3
> Transport-type: tcp
> Bricks:
> Brick1: gluster0:/gluster/vms/brick
> Brick2: gluster1:/gluster/vms/brick
> Brick3: gluster2:/gluster/vms/brick (arbiter)
> Options Reconfigured:
> server.event-threads: 4
> client.event-threads: 4
> performance.client-io-threads: on
> features.shard-block-size: 512MB
> cluster.granular-entry-heal: enable
> performance.strict-o-direct: on
> network.ping-timeout: 30
> storage.owner-gid: 36
> storage.owner-uid: 36
> user.cifs: off
> features.shard: on
> cluster.shd-wait-qlength: 10000
> cluster.shd-max-threads: 8
> cluster.locking-scheme: granular
> cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm: full
> cluster.server-quorum-type: server
> cluster.quorum-type: auto
> cluster.eager-lock: enable
> network.remote-dio: off
> performance.low-prio-threads: 32
> performance.stat-prefetch: on
> performance.io-cache: off
> performance.read-ahead: off
> performance.quick-read: off
> transport.address-family: inet
> performance.readdir-ahead: on
> nfs.disable: on
> nfs.export-volumes: on
>
>
> I observed that when testing with dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=1G
count=1 I
> get 65MB/s on the vms gluster volume (and the network traffic between the
> servers reaches ~ 500Mbps), while when testing with dd if=/dev/zero
> of=testfile bs=1G count=1 oflag=direct I get a consistent 10MB/s and the
> network traffic hardly reaching 100Mbps.
>
> Any other things one can do?
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Krutika Dhananjay < kdhananj at redhat.com >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> I'm assuming you are using this volume to store vm images, because I see
> shard in the options list.
>
> Speaking from shard translator's POV, one thing you can do to improve
> performance is to use preallocated images.
> This will at least eliminate the need for shard to perform multiple steps
as
> part of the writes - such as creating the shard and then writing to it and
> then updating the aggregated file size - all of which require one network
> call each, which further get blown up once they reach AFR (replicate) into
> many more network calls.
>
> Second, I'm assuming you're using the default shard block size of 4MB (you
> can confirm this using `gluster volume get <VOL> shard-block-size`). In
our
> tests, we've found that larger shard sizes perform better. So maybe change
> the shard-block-size to 64MB (`gluster volume set <VOL> shard-block-size
> 64MB`).
>
> Third, keep stat-prefetch enabled. We've found that qemu sends quite a
lot of
> [f]stats which can be served from the (md)cache to improve performance. So
> enable that.
>
> Also, could you also enable client-io-threads and see if that improves
> performance?
>
> Which version of gluster are you using BTW?
>
> -Krutika
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Abi Askushi < rightkicktech at gmail.com >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a gluster volume used to host several VMs (managed through oVirt).
> The volume is a replica 3 with arbiter and the 3 servers use 1 Gbit
network
> for the storage.
>
> When testing with dd (dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=1G count=1
oflag=direct)
> out of the volume (e.g. writing at /root/) the performance of the dd is
> reported to be ~ 700MB/s, which is quite decent. When testing the dd on
the
> gluster volume I get ~ 43 MB/s which way lower from the previous. When
> testing with dd the gluster volume, the network traffic was not exceeding
> 450 Mbps on the network interface. I would expect to reach near 900 Mbps
> considering that there is 1 Gbit of bandwidth available. This results
having
> VMs with very slow performance (especially on their write operations).
>
> The full details of the volume are below. Any advise on what can be
tweaked
> will be highly appreciated.
>
> Volume Name: vms
> Type: Replicate
> Volume ID: 4513340d-7919-498b-bfe0-d836b5cea40b
> Status: Started
> Snapshot Count: 0
> Number of Bricks: 1 x (2 + 1) = 3
> Transport-type: tcp
> Bricks:
> Brick1: gluster0:/gluster/vms/brick
> Brick2: gluster1:/gluster/vms/brick
> Brick3: gluster2:/gluster/vms/brick (arbiter)
> Options Reconfigured:
> cluster.granular-entry-heal: enable
> performance.strict-o-direct: on
> network.ping-timeout: 30
> storage.owner-gid: 36
> storage.owner-uid: 36
> user.cifs: off
> features.shard: on
> cluster.shd-wait-qlength: 10000
> cluster.shd-max-threads: 8
> cluster.locking-scheme: granular
> cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm: full
> cluster.server-quorum-type: server
> cluster.quorum-type: auto
> cluster.eager-lock: enable
> network.remote-dio: off
> performance.low-prio-threads: 32
> performance.stat-prefetch: off
> performance.io-cache: off
> performance.read-ahead: off
> performance.quick-read: off
> transport.address-family: inet
> performance.readdir-ahead: on
> nfs.disable: on
> nfs.export-volumes: on
>
>
> Thanx,
> Alex
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170911/ad7365b1/attachment.html>