[Gluster-users] how to verify bitrot signed file manually?

Amudhan P amudhan83 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 13 07:44:49 UTC 2017


any update?.

why is it marked bad?

Any way to find out what happened to the file?


On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Amudhan P <amudhan83 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> my volume is distributed disperse volume 8+2 EC.
> file1 and file2 are different files lying in same brick. I am able to read
> the file from mount point without any issue because of EC it reads rest of
> the available blocks in other nodes.
>
> my question is "file1" sha256 value matches bitrot signature value but
> still, it is also marked as bad by scrubber daemon. why is that?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar <
> khiremat at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Amudhan,
>>
>> Sorry for the late response as I was busy with other things. You are
>> right bitrot uses sha256 for checksum.
>> If file-1, file-2 are marked bad, the I/O should be errored out with EIO.
>> If that is not happening, we need
>> to look further into it. But what's the file contents of file-1 and
>> file-2 on the replica bricks ? Are they
>> matching ?
>>
>> Thanks and Regards,
>> Kotresh HR
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Amudhan P <amudhan83 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> resending mail.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Amudhan P <amudhan83 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ok, from bitrot code I figured out gluster using sha256 hashing algo.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now coming to the problem, during scrub run in my cluster some of my
>>>> files were marked as bad in few set of nodes.
>>>> I just wanted to confirm bad file. so, I have used "sha256sum" tool in
>>>> Linux to manually get file hash.
>>>>
>>>> here is the result.
>>>>
>>>> file-1, file-2 marked as bad by scrub and file-3 is healthy.
>>>>
>>>> file-1 sha256 and bitrot signature value matches but still it's been
>>>> marked as bad.
>>>>
>>>> file-2 sha256 and bitrot signature value don't match, could be a victim
>>>> of bitrot or bitflip.file is still readable without any issue and no errors
>>>> found in the drive.
>>>>
>>>> file-3 sha256 and bitrot signature matches and healthy.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> file-1 output from
>>>>
>>>> "sha256sum" = "71eada9352b1352aaef0f806d3d56
>>>> 1768ce2df905ded1668f665e06eca2d0bd4"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "getfattr -m. -e hex -d "
>>>> # file: file-1
>>>> trusted.bit-rot.bad-file=0x3100
>>>> trusted.bit-rot.signature=0x01020000000000000071eada9352b135
>>>> 2aaef0f806d3d561768ce2df905ded1668f665e06eca2d0bd4
>>>> trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000058e4f3b40006793d
>>>> trusted.ec.config=0x0000080a02000200
>>>> trusted.ec.dirty=0x00000000000000000000000000000000
>>>> trusted.ec.size=0x0000000718996701
>>>> trusted.ec.version=0x0000000000038c4c0000000000038c4d
>>>> trusted.gfid=0xf078a24134fe4f9bb953eca8c28dea9a
>>>>
>>>> output scrub log:
>>>> [2017-09-02 13:02:20.311160] A [MSGID: 118023]
>>>> [bit-rot-scrub.c:244:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0:
>>>> CORRUPTION DETECTED: Object /file-1 {Brick: /media/disk16/brick16 | GFID:
>>>> f078a241-34fe-4f9b-b953-eca8c28dea9a}
>>>> [2017-09-02 13:02:20.311579] A [MSGID: 118024]
>>>> [bit-rot-scrub.c:264:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0:
>>>> Marking /file-1 [GFID: f078a241-34fe-4f9b-b953-eca8c28dea9a | Brick:
>>>> /media/disk16/brick16] as corrupted..
>>>>
>>>> file-2 output from
>>>>
>>>> "sha256sum" = "c41ef9c81faed4f3e6010ea67984c
>>>> 3cfefd842f98ee342939151f9250972dcda"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "getfattr -m. -e hex -d "
>>>> # file: file-2
>>>> trusted.bit-rot.bad-file=0x3100
>>>> trusted.bit-rot.signature=0x0102000000000000009162cb17d4f0be
>>>> e676fcb7830c5286d05b8e8940d14f3d117cb90b7b1defc129
>>>> trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000058e4f3b400019bb2
>>>> trusted.ec.config=0x0000080a02000200
>>>> trusted.ec.dirty=0x00000000000000000000000000000000
>>>> trusted.ec.size=0x00000000403433f6
>>>> trusted.ec.version=0x000000000000201a000000000000201b
>>>> trusted.gfid=0xa50012b0a632477c99232313928d239a
>>>>
>>>> output scrub log:
>>>> [2017-09-02 05:18:14.003156] A [MSGID: 118023]
>>>> [bit-rot-scrub.c:244:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0:
>>>> CORRUPTION DETECTED: Object /file-2 {Brick: /media/disk13/brick13 | GFID:
>>>> a50012b0-a632-477c-9923-2313928d239a}
>>>> [2017-09-02 05:18:14.006629] A [MSGID: 118024]
>>>> [bit-rot-scrub.c:264:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0:
>>>> Marking /file-2 [GFID: a50012b0-a632-477c-9923-2313928d239a | Brick:
>>>> /media/disk13/brick13] as corrupted..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> file-3 output from
>>>>
>>>> "sha256sum" = "a590735b3c8936cc7ca9835128a19
>>>> c38a3f79c8fd53fddc031a9349b7e273f27"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "getfattr -m. -e hex -d "
>>>> # file: file-3
>>>> trusted.bit-rot.signature=0x010200000000000000a590735b3c8936
>>>> cc7ca9835128a19c38a3f79c8fd53fddc031a9349b7e273f27
>>>> trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000058e4f3b400019bb2
>>>> trusted.ec.config=0x0000080a02000200
>>>> trusted.ec.dirty=0x00000000000000000000000000000000
>>>> trusted.ec.size=0x000000003530fc96
>>>> trusted.ec.version=0x0000000000001a980000000000001a99
>>>> trusted.gfid=0x10d8920e42cd42cf9448b8bf3941c192
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> most of the bitrot bad files are in the set of new nodes and data were
>>>> uploaded using gluster 3.10.1. no drive issues are any kind of error msgs
>>>> in logs.
>>>>
>>>> what could be gone wrong?
>>>>
>>>> regards
>>>> Amudhan
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Amudhan P <amudhan83 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a file in my brick which was signed by bitrot and latter when
>>>>> running scrub it was marked as bad.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, I want to verify file again manually. just to clarify my doubt
>>>>>
>>>>> how can I do this?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> regards
>>>>> Amudhan
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks and Regards,
>> Kotresh H R
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20171013/f5d6fd32/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list