[Gluster-users] gluster volume + lvm : recommendation or neccessity ?

[Alastair Neil]

LVM is also good if you want to add ssd cache.  It is more flexible and
easier to manage and expand than bcache.

On 11 October 2017 at 04:00, Mohammed Rafi K C <rkavunga at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> Volumes are aggregation of bricks, so I would consider bricks as a
> unique entity here rather than volumes. Taking the constraints from the
> blog [1].
>
> * All bricks should be carved out from an independent thinly provisioned
> logical volume (LV). In other words, no two brick should share a common
> LV. More details about thin provisioning and thin provisioned snapshot
> can be found here.
> * This thinly provisioned LV should only be used for forming a brick.
> * Thin pool from which the thin LVs are created should have sufficient
> space and also it should have sufficient space for pool metadata.
>
> You can refer the blog post here [1].
>
> [1] : http://rajesh-joseph.blogspot.in/p/gluster-volume-snapshot-
> howto.html
>
> Regards
> Rafi KC
>
>
> On 10/11/2017 01:23 PM, ML wrote:
> > Thanks Rafi, that's understood now :)
> >
> > I'm considering to deploy gluster on a 4 x 40 TB  bricks, do you think
> > it would better to make 1 LVM partition for each Volume I need or to
> > make one Big LVM partition and start multiple volumes on it ?
> >
> > We'll store mostly big files (videos) on this environement.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Le 11/10/2017 à 09:34, Mohammed Rafi K C a écrit :
> >>
> >> On 10/11/2017 12:20 PM, ML wrote:
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> I've read on the gluster & redhat documentation, that it seems
> >>> recommended to use XFS over LVM before creating & using gluster
> >>> volumes.
> >>>
> >>> Sources :
> >>> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_
> Storage/3/html/Administration_Guide/Formatting_and_Mounting_Bricks.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> http://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%
> 20Guide/Setting%20Up%20Volumes/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> My point is : do we really need LVM ?
> >> This recommendations was added after gluster-snapshot. Gluster snapshot
> >> relays on LVM snapshot. So if you start with out lvm, in future if you
> >> want to use snapshot then it would be difficult, hence the
> >> recommendation to use xfs on top of lvm.
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Rafi KC
> >>
> >>> For example , on a dedicated server with disks & partitions that will
> >>> not change of size, it doesn't seems necessary to use LVM.
> >>>
> >>> I can't understand clearly wich partitioning strategy would be the
> >>> best for "static size" hard drives :
> >>>
> >>> 1 LVM+XFS partition = multiple gluster volumes
> >>> or 1 LVM+XFS partition = 1 gluster volume per LVM+XFS partition
> >>> or 1 XFS partition = multiple gluster volumes
> >>> or 1 XFS partition = 1 gluster volume per XFS partition
> >>>
> >>> What do you use on your servers ?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your help! :)
> >>>
> >>> Quentin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Gluster-users mailing list
> >>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> >>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20171011/86690bcc/attachment.html>