[Gluster-users] gluster volume + lvm : recommendation or neccessity ?
lists at websiteburo.com
Wed Oct 11 07:09:16 UTC 2017
just had an answer here for those interrested :
Le 11/10/2017 à 08:50, ML a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
> I've read on the gluster & redhat documentation, that it seems
> recommended to use XFS over LVM before creating & using gluster volumes.
> Sources :
> My point is : do we really need LVM ?
> For example , on a dedicated server with disks & partitions that will
> not change of size, it doesn't seems necessary to use LVM.
> I can't understand clearly wich partitioning strategy would be the
> best for "static size" hard drives :
> 1 LVM+XFS partition = multiple gluster volumes
> or 1 LVM+XFS partition = 1 gluster volume per LVM+XFS partition
> or 1 XFS partition = multiple gluster volumes
> or 1 XFS partition = 1 gluster volume per XFS partition
> What do you use on your servers ?
> Thanks for your help! :)
More information about the Gluster-users