[Gluster-users] Elasticsearch facing CorruptIndexException exception with GlusterFs 3.10.1
Abhijit Paul
er.abhijitpaul at gmail.com
Fri May 5 12:06:28 UTC 2017
So should i start using gluster-block with elasticsearch in kubernetes
environment?
My expectation from gluster-block is, it should not CorruptIndex
of elasticsearch...and issue facing in previous mails.
Please let me know whether should i processed with above mentioned
combination.
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu at redhat.com
> wrote:
> Abhijit we just started making the efforts to get all of this stable.
>
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Abhijit Paul <er.abhijitpaul at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I yet to try gluster-block with elasticsearch...but carious to know does
>> this combination plays well in kubernetes environment?
>>
>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Abhijit Paul <er.abhijitpaul at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> thanks Krutika for the alternative.
>>>
>>> @*Prasanna @**Pranith*
>>> I was going thorough the mentioned blog post and saw that used tested
>>> environment was Fedora ,
>>> but i am using RHEL based Oracle linux so does gluster-block compatible
>>> with RHEL as well?
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah, there are a couple of cache consistency issues with performance
>>>> translators that are causing these exceptions.
>>>> Some of them were fixed by 3.10.1. Some still remain.
>>>>
>>>> Alternatively you can give gluster-block + elasticsearch a try, which
>>>> doesn't require solving all these caching issues.
>>>> Here's a blog post on the same - https://pkalever.wordpress.com
>>>> /2017/03/14/elasticsearch-with-gluster-block/
>>>>
>>>> Adding Prasanna and Pranith who worked on this, in case you need more
>>>> info on this.
>>>>
>>>> -Krutika
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Abhijit Paul <er.abhijitpaul at gmail.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the reply, i will try it out but i am also facing one more
>>>>> issue "i.e. replicated volumes returning different timestamps"
>>>>> so is this because of Bug 1426548 - Openshift Logging ElasticSearch
>>>>> FSLocks when using GlusterFS storage backend
>>>>> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426548> ?
>>>>>
>>>>> *FYI i am using glusterfs 3.10.1 tar.gz*
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Abhijit
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Abhijit Paul <
>>>>>> er.abhijitpaul at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since i am new to gluster, can please provide how to turn off/disable
>>>>>>> "perf xlator options"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ gluster volume set <volname> performance.stat-prefetch off
>>>>>> $ gluster volume set <volname> performance.read-ahead off
>>>>>> $ gluster volume set <volname> performance.write-behind off
>>>>>> $ gluster volume set <volname> performance.io-cache off
>>>>>> $ gluster volume set <volname> performance.quick-read off
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Amar
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com
>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think there is still some pending stuffs in some of the gluster
>>>>>>>>> perf xlators to make that work complete. Cced the relevant folks for more
>>>>>>>>> information. Can you please turn off all the perf xlator options as a work
>>>>>>>>> around to move forward?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Abhijit Paul <
>>>>>>>>> er.abhijitpaul at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dear folks,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I setup Glusterfs(3.10.1) NFS type as persistence volume for
>>>>>>>>>> Elasticsearch(5.1.2) but currently facing issue with *"CorruptIndexException"
>>>>>>>>>> *with Elasticseach logs and due to that index health trued RED
>>>>>>>>>> in Elasticsearch.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Later found that there was an issue with gluster < 3.10 (
>>>>>>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390050) but even
>>>>>>>>>> after *upgrading to 3.10.1 issue is still there.*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *So curios to know what would be the root cause to fix this
>>>>>>>>>> issue.*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Abhijit
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Amar Tumballi (amarts)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Pranith
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170505/fef58fc0/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list