[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] gfid and volume-id extended attributes lost

Ankireddypalle Reddy areddy at commvault.com
Fri Jul 7 21:28:36 UTC 2017


We lost the attributes on all the bricks on servers glusterfs2 and glusterfs3 again.

[root at glusterfs2 Log_Files]# gluster volume info

Volume Name: StoragePool
Type: Distributed-Disperse
Volume ID: 149e976f-4e21-451c-bf0f-f5691208531f
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 20 x (2 + 1) = 60
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: glusterfs1sds:/ws/disk1/ws_brick
Brick2: glusterfs2sds:/ws/disk1/ws_brick
Brick3: glusterfs3sds:/ws/disk1/ws_brick
Brick4: glusterfs1sds:/ws/disk2/ws_brick
Brick5: glusterfs2sds:/ws/disk2/ws_brick
Brick6: glusterfs3sds:/ws/disk2/ws_brick
Brick7: glusterfs1sds:/ws/disk3/ws_brick
Brick8: glusterfs2sds:/ws/disk3/ws_brick
Brick9: glusterfs3sds:/ws/disk3/ws_brick
Brick10: glusterfs1sds:/ws/disk4/ws_brick
Brick11: glusterfs2sds:/ws/disk4/ws_brick
Brick12: glusterfs3sds:/ws/disk4/ws_brick
Brick13: glusterfs1sds:/ws/disk5/ws_brick
Brick14: glusterfs2sds:/ws/disk5/ws_brick
Brick15: glusterfs3sds:/ws/disk5/ws_brick
Brick16: glusterfs1sds:/ws/disk6/ws_brick
Brick17: glusterfs2sds:/ws/disk6/ws_brick
Brick18: glusterfs3sds:/ws/disk6/ws_brick
Brick19: glusterfs1sds:/ws/disk7/ws_brick
Brick20: glusterfs2sds:/ws/disk7/ws_brick
Brick21: glusterfs3sds:/ws/disk7/ws_brick
Brick22: glusterfs1sds:/ws/disk8/ws_brick
Brick23: glusterfs2sds:/ws/disk8/ws_brick
Brick24: glusterfs3sds:/ws/disk8/ws_brick
Brick25: glusterfs4sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk1/ws_brick
Brick26: glusterfs5sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk1/ws_brick
Brick27: glusterfs6sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk1/ws_brick
Brick28: glusterfs4sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk10/ws_brick
Brick29: glusterfs5sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk10/ws_brick
Brick30: glusterfs6sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk10/ws_brick
Brick31: glusterfs4sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk11/ws_brick
Brick32: glusterfs5sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk11/ws_brick
Brick33: glusterfs6sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk11/ws_brick
Brick34: glusterfs4sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk12/ws_brick
Brick35: glusterfs5sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk12/ws_brick
Brick36: glusterfs6sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk12/ws_brick
Brick37: glusterfs4sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk2/ws_brick
Brick38: glusterfs5sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk2/ws_brick
Brick39: glusterfs6sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk2/ws_brick
Brick40: glusterfs4sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk3/ws_brick
Brick41: glusterfs5sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk3/ws_brick
Brick42: glusterfs6sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk3/ws_brick
Brick43: glusterfs4sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk4/ws_brick
Brick44: glusterfs5sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk4/ws_brick
Brick45: glusterfs6sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk4/ws_brick
Brick46: glusterfs4sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk5/ws_brick
Brick47: glusterfs5sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk5/ws_brick
Brick48: glusterfs6sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk5/ws_brick
Brick49: glusterfs4sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk6/ws_brick
Brick50: glusterfs5sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk6/ws_brick
Brick51: glusterfs6sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk6/ws_brick
Brick52: glusterfs4sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk7/ws_brick
Brick53: glusterfs5sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk7/ws_brick
Brick54: glusterfs6sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk7/ws_brick
Brick55: glusterfs4sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk8/ws_brick
Brick56: glusterfs5sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk8/ws_brick
Brick57: glusterfs6sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk8/ws_brick
Brick58: glusterfs4sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk9/ws_brick
Brick59: glusterfs5sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk9/ws_brick
Brick60: glusterfs6sds.commvault.com:/ws/disk9/ws_brick
Options Reconfigured:
performance.readdir-ahead: on
diagnostics.client-log-level: INFO
auth.allow: glusterfs1sds,glusterfs2sds,glusterfs3sds,glusterfs4sds.commvault.com,glusterfs5sds.commvault.com,glusterfs6sds.commvault.com

Thanks and Regards,
Ram
From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:15 PM
To: Ankireddypalle Reddy
Cc: Gluster Devel (gluster-devel at gluster.org); gluster-users at gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] gfid and volume-id extended attributes lost



On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Ankireddypalle Reddy <areddy at commvault.com<mailto:areddy at commvault.com>> wrote:
3.7.19

These are the only callers for removexattr and only _posix_remove_xattr has the potential to do removexattr as posix_removexattr already makes sure that it is not gfid/volume-id. And surprise surprise _posix_remove_xattr happens only from healing code of afr/ec. And this can only happen if the source brick doesn't have gfid, which doesn't seem to match with the situation you explained.

   #   line  filename / context / line
   1   1234  xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-quota.c <<glusterd_remove_quota_limit>>
             ret = sys_lremovexattr (abspath, QUOTA_LIMIT_KEY);
   2   1243  xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-quota.c <<glusterd_remove_quota_limit>>
             ret = sys_lremovexattr (abspath, QUOTA_LIMIT_OBJECTS_KEY);
   3   6102  xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-utils.c <<glusterd_check_and_set_brick_xattr>>
             sys_lremovexattr (path, "trusted.glusterfs.test");
   4     80  xlators/storage/posix/src/posix-handle.h <<REMOVE_PGFID_XATTR>>
             op_ret = sys_lremovexattr (path, key); \
   5   5026  xlators/storage/posix/src/posix.c <<_posix_remove_xattr>>
             op_ret = sys_lremovexattr (filler->real_path, key);
   6   5101  xlators/storage/posix/src/posix.c <<posix_removexattr>>
             op_ret = sys_lremovexattr (real_path, name);
   7   6811  xlators/storage/posix/src/posix.c <<init>>
             sys_lremovexattr (dir_data->data, "trusted.glusterfs.test");
So there are only two possibilities:
1) Source directory in ec/afr doesn't have gfid
2) Something else removed these xattrs.
What is your volume info? May be that will give more clues.

 PS: sys_fremovexattr is called only from posix_fremovexattr(), so that doesn't seem to be the culprit as it also have checks to guard against gfid/volume-id removal.

Thanks and Regards,
Ram
From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com<mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com>]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 11:54 AM

To: Ankireddypalle Reddy
Cc: Gluster Devel (gluster-devel at gluster.org<mailto:gluster-devel at gluster.org>); gluster-users at gluster.org<mailto:gluster-users at gluster.org>
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] gfid and volume-id extended attributes lost



On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Ankireddypalle Reddy <areddy at commvault.com<mailto:areddy at commvault.com>> wrote:
Pranith,
                 Thanks for looking in to the issue. The bricks were mounted after the reboot. One more thing that I noticed was when the attributes were manually set when glusterd was up then on starting the volume the attributes were again lost. Had to stop glusterd set attributes and then start glusterd. After that the volume start succeeded.

Which version is this?


Thanks and Regards,
Ram

From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com<mailto:pkarampu at redhat.com>]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 11:46 AM
To: Ankireddypalle Reddy
Cc: Gluster Devel (gluster-devel at gluster.org<mailto:gluster-devel at gluster.org>); gluster-users at gluster.org<mailto:gluster-users at gluster.org>
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] gfid and volume-id extended attributes lost

Did anything special happen on these two bricks? It can't happen in the I/O path:
posix_removexattr() has:
  0         if (!strcmp (GFID_XATTR_KEY, name)) {
  1                 gf_msg (this->name, GF_LOG_WARNING, 0, P_MSG_XATTR_NOT_REMOVED,
  2                         "Remove xattr called on gfid for file %s", real_path);
  3                 op_ret = -1;
  4                 goto out;
  5         }
  6         if (!strcmp (GF_XATTR_VOL_ID_KEY, name)) {
  7                 gf_msg (this->name, GF_LOG_WARNING, 0, P_MSG_XATTR_NOT_REMOVED,
  8                         "Remove xattr called on volume-id for file %s",
  9                         real_path);
 10                 op_ret = -1;
 11                 goto out;
 12         }
I just found that op_errno is not set correctly, but it can't happen in the I/O path, so self-heal/rebalance are off the hook.
I also grepped for any removexattr of trusted.gfid from glusterd and didn't find any.
So one thing that used to happen was that sometimes when machines reboot, the brick mounts wouldn't happen and this would lead to absence of both trusted.gfid and volume-id. So at the moment this is my wild guess.


On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Ankireddypalle Reddy <areddy at commvault.com<mailto:areddy at commvault.com>> wrote:
Hi,
       We faced an issue in the production today. We had to stop the volume and reboot all the servers in the cluster.  Once the servers rebooted starting of the volume failed because the following extended attributes were not present on all the bricks on 2 servers.

1)      trusted.gfid

2)      trusted.glusterfs.volume-id

We had to manually set these extended attributes to start the volume.  Are there any such known issues.

Thanks and Regards,
Ram
***************************Legal Disclaimer***************************
"This communication may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the message by mistake,
please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you."
**********************************************************************

_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel at gluster.org<mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



--
Pranith
***************************Legal Disclaimer***************************
"This communication may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the message by mistake,
please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you."
**********************************************************************



--
Pranith
***************************Legal Disclaimer***************************
"This communication may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the message by mistake,
please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you."
**********************************************************************



--
Pranith
***************************Legal Disclaimer***************************
"This communication may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the message by mistake,
please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you."
**********************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170707/16cc4d2f/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list