[Gluster-users] 90 Brick/Server suggestions?
cobanserkan at gmail.com
Fri Feb 17 15:24:38 UTC 2017
>Any particular reason for this, other than maximising space by avoiding two layers of RAID/redundancy?
Yes that's right we can get 720TB net usable space per server with
90*10TB disks. Any RAID layer will cost too much..
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Gambit15 <dougti+gluster at gmail.com> wrote:
>> RAID is not an option, JBOD with EC will be used.
> Any particular reason for this, other than maximising space by avoiding two
> layers of RAID/redundancy?
> Local RAID would be far simpler & quicker for replacing failed drives, and
> it would greatly reduce the number of bricks & load on Gluster.
> We use RAID volumes for our bricks, and the benefits of simplified
> management far outweigh the costs of a little lost capacity.
More information about the Gluster-users