[Gluster-users] peer rejected but connected

lejeczek peljasz at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Aug 30 10:32:44 UTC 2017



On 30/08/17 07:18, Gaurav Yadav wrote:
>
> Could you please send me "info" file which is placed in 
> "/var/lib/glusterd/vols/<vol-name>" directory from all the 
> nodes along with
> glusterd.logs and command-history.
>
I've send you some logs, thanks.

One more possibly interesting fact - now when 
fourth(rejected) peer was detached I still see in 
"/var/lib/glusterd/vols/<vol-name>"

vol-name.client.10.5.6.17..... (which is IP of the rejected 
peer)
and the same with .rpmsave
Only on two out of three peers which constitute a healthy 
cluster. One peer does not have these files.

I wonder - was it upgrade from 3.8 to 3.10 that caused this 
problem.
Can these file be deleted? And if yes would this be enough?


> Thanks
> Gaurav
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 7:13 PM, lejeczek 
> <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk <mailto:peljasz at yahoo.co.uk>> wrote:
>
>     hi fellas,
>     same old same
>     in log of the probing peer I see:
>     ...
>     2017-08-29 13:36:16.882196] I [MSGID: 106493]
>     [glusterd-handler.c:3020:__glusterd_handle_probe_query]
>     0-glusterd: Responded to priv.xx.xx.priv.xx.xx.x,
>     op_ret: 0, op_errno: 0, ret: 0
>     [2017-08-29 13:36:16.904961] I [MSGID: 106490]
>     [glusterd-handler.c:2606:__glusterd_handle_incoming_friend_req]
>     0-glusterd: Received probe from uuid:
>     2a17edb4-ae68-4b67-916e-e38a2087ca28
>     [2017-08-29 13:36:16.906477] E [MSGID: 106010]
>     [glusterd-utils.c:3034:glusterd_compare_friend_volume]
>     0-management: Version of Cksums CO-DATA differ. local
>     cksum = 4088157353, remote cksum = 2870780063 on peer
>     10.5.6.17
>     [2017-08-29 13:36:16.907187] I [MSGID: 106493]
>     [glusterd-handler.c:3866:glusterd_xfer_friend_add_resp]
>     0-glusterd: Responded to 10.5.6.17 (0), ret: 0, op_ret: -1
>     ...
>
>     Why would adding a new peer make cluster jump to check
>     checksums on a vol on that newly added peer? Is it why
>     the peer gets rejected?
>     That peer I'm hoping to add, was a member of the
>     cluster in the past but I did "usual" wipe of
>     /var/lib/gluster on candidate peer.
>
>     a hint, solution would be great to hear.
>     L.
>     _______________________________________________
>     Gluster-users mailing list
>     Gluster-users at gluster.org
>     <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>
>     http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>     <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>
>
>



More information about the Gluster-users mailing list