[Gluster-users] High load on glusterfsd process

ABHISHEK PALIWAL abhishpaliwal at gmail.com
Fri Apr 21 06:51:29 UTC 2017


If the patch provided in that case will resolve my bug as well then please
provide the patch so that I will backport it on 3.7.6

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:30 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Team,
>
> I have noticed that there are so many glusterfsd threads are running in my
> system and we observed some of those thread consuming more cpu. I did
> “strace” on two such threads (before the problem disappeared by itself) and
> found that there is a continuous activity like below:
>
> lstat("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92f8-
> 4dfe-9a7f-246e901cbdf1/002700/firewall_-J208482-4000025_20170126T113552+0000.log.gz",
> {st_mode=S_IFREG|0670, st_size=1995, ...}) = 0
> lgetxattr("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92f8-4dfe-9a7f-
> 246e901cbdf1/002700/firewall_-J208482-4000025_20170126T113552+0000.log.gz",
> "trusted.bit-rot.bad-file", 0x3fff81f58550, 255) = -1 ENODATA (No data
> available)
> lgetxattr("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92f8-4dfe-9a7f-
> 246e901cbdf1/002700/firewall_-J208482-4000025_20170126T113552+0000.log.gz",
> "trusted.bit-rot.signature", 0x3fff81f58550, 255) = -1 ENODATA (No data
> available)
> lstat("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92f8-
> 4dfe-9a7f-246e901cbdf1/002700/tcli_-J208482-4000025_20170123T180550+0000.log.gz",
> {st_mode=S_IFREG|0670, st_size=169, ...}) = 0
> lgetxattr("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92f8-4dfe-9a7f-
> 246e901cbdf1/002700/tcli_-J208482-4000025_20170123T180550+0000.log.gz",
> "trusted.bit-rot.bad-file", 0x3fff81f58550, 255) = -1 ENODATA (No data
> available)
> lgetxattr("/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick/.glusterfs/e7/7d/e77d12b3-92f8-4dfe-9a7f-
> 246e901cbdf1/002700/tcli_-J208482-4000025_20170123T180550+0000.log.gz",
> "trusted.bit-rot.signature", 0x3fff81f58550, 255) = -1 ENODATA (No data
> available)
>
> I have found the below existing issue which is very similar to my scenario.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298258
>
> We are using the gluster-3.7.6 and it seems that the issue is fixed in
> 3.8.4 version.
>
> Could you please let me know why it showing the number of above logs and
> reason behind it as it is not explained in the above bug.
>
> Regards,
> Abhishek
>
> --
>
>
>
>
> Regards
> Abhishek Paliwal
>



-- 




Regards
Abhishek Paliwal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170421/1e237ddd/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list