[Gluster-users] supermicro 60/90 bay servers

[Ingard Mevåg]

Our use case is archive storage so we are mainly after high capacity setups
with some sort of resilliency. We do have 10gig nics on these boxes, but
thats mainly for resync etc. For our end user traffic we dont need more
than 1gig per server.

Is it possible to change the EC setup when/if we double the number of nodes
in the cluster?

kind regards
ingard

2017-04-20 20:03 GMT+02:00 Serkan Çoban <cobanserkan at gmail.com>:

> What is your use case? Disperse is good for archive workloads, big files.
> I suggest you to buy 10 servers and use 8+2 EC configuration. This way you
> can
> handle two node failures. We are using 28 disk servers but our next
> cluster will use 68 disk servers.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Ingard Mevåg <ingard at jotta.no> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > We've been looking at supermicro 60 and 90 bay servers. Are anyone else
> > using these models (or similar density) for gluster?
> > Specifically I'd like to setup a distributed disperse volume with 8 of
> these
> > servers.
> >
> > Any insight, does and donts or best practice guidelines would be
> appreciated
> > :)
> >
> > kind regards
> > Ingard
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170421/3dc390f9/attachment.html>